Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Healthbot - update preview api #11981

Closed

Conversation

guy-microsoft
Copy link
Contributor

@guy-microsoft guy-microsoft commented Dec 7, 2020

  1. Add support for async operations for DELETE and PATCH.

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet. December 2020
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet. December 2020
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

2. Add support for async operations for DELETE and PATCH.
@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Dec 7, 2020

Swagger Validation Report

️❌BreakingChange: 2 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule Message
1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '201'.
New: Microsoft.HealthBot/preview/2020-10-20-preview/healthbot.json#L214:11
1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
New: Microsoft.HealthBot/preview/2020-10-20-preview/healthbot.json#L254:11
️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Dec 7, 2020

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
️❌ azure-sdk-for-java failed [Detail]
  • Failed [Logs] Generate from 26f5fca29ed6ef0b36f460ec62f70c99d6d23f4d. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
    cmderr	[generate.py] 2020-12-07 12:45:02 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find version for "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-healthbot"
    cmderr	[generate.py] 2020-12-07 12:45:02 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.1"
    cmderr	[generate.py] 2020-12-07 12:45:02 INFO autorest --version=3.0.6327 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.5 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/w/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/w/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/healthbot/azure-resourcemanager-healthbot --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.healthbot  --package-version=1.0.0-beta.1 --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --pipeline.modelerfour.flatten-payloads=false --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/healthbot/resource-manager/readme.md
    cmderr	[generate.py] 2020-12-07 12:45:36 INFO [CI][Success] Write to ci.yml
    cmderr	[generate.py] 2020-12-07 12:45:36 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
    cmderr	[generate.py] 2020-12-07 12:45:36 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
    cmderr	[generate.py] 2020-12-07 12:45:36 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
    cmderr	[generate.py] 2020-12-07 12:45:36 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
    cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
    cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.ReflectionUtils (file:/home/vsts/.m2/repository/org/codehaus/groovy/groovy/3.0.0-beta-2/groovy-3.0.0-beta-2-indy.jar) to method java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.toString()
    cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.ReflectionUtils
    cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
    cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
    ENOTDIR: not a directory, scandir 'azure-sdk-for-java/pom.xml'
    Error: ENOTDIR: not a directory, scandir 'azure-sdk-for-java/pom.xml'
  • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-healthbot [View full logs
    error	Fatal error: ENOTDIR: not a directory, scandir 'azure-sdk-for-java/pom.xml'
    error	The following packages are still pending:
    error		azure-resourcemanager-healthbot
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-python succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 26f5fca29ed6ef0b36f460ec62f70c99d6d23f4d. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
    command	npx n 12
    command	python3 -m venv venv
    command	pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel pip
    command	pip install pathlib jinja2 msrestazure
    command	autorest --version=V2 --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.python@~4.0.71 --python --python-mode=update --multiapi --keep-version-file --no-async --python-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/w/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/healthbot/resource-manager/readme.md
    warn	No package detected after generation
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]
  • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 26f5fca29ed6ef0b36f460ec62f70c99d6d23f4d. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
    command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.4.4 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/w/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/healthbot/resource-manager/readme.md
    warn	No file changes detected after generation
    warn	No package detected after generation
️️✔️[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi @guy-microsoft, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ma/swaggerfeedback.

@guy-microsoft guy-microsoft added the NotReadyForReview <valid label in PR review process>It is in draft for swagger or not swagger PR label Dec 7, 2020
@guy-microsoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

guy-microsoft commented Dec 7, 2020

The resource type is not yet used in Prod, so no external customers use it.

Business justification for breaking change:
The PR consists of 2 changes:

  1. Support async DELETE and PATCH (in order to meet the KPI requirements).
  2. Added a new tier, "C0", per product team request.

@guy-microsoft guy-microsoft removed the NotReadyForReview <valid label in PR review process>It is in draft for swagger or not swagger PR label Dec 7, 2020
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @guy-microsoft Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @raych1
    Copy link
    Member

    raych1 commented Dec 8, 2020

    Hi @guy-microsoft, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ma/swaggerfeedback.

    @guy-microsoft , again please follow the action in above comment for the breaking change review process.

    @guy-microsoft
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    guy-microsoft commented Dec 8, 2020

    @raych1 In case my breaking change is not due to compliance/security, would it be better (and faster to review) to create a new api-version instead?
    I created a PR with a new api version: #12006 that can replace this breaking change PR.

    @raych1
    Copy link
    Member

    raych1 commented Dec 9, 2020

    @raych1 In case my breaking change is not due to compliance/security, would it be better (and faster to review) to create a new api-version instead?
    I created a PR with a new api version: #12006 that can replace this breaking change PR.

    @guy-microsoft , for the change of adding response code, it is still breaking change even in new api version. So, the breaking change review process is the same.

    @guy-microsoft
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Closing, replaced by this PR:
    #12006

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @guy-microsoft, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants