-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding patch operation in 2019-03-01 API #12190
Conversation
Hi, @napolish Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
1039 - AddedOperation |
The new version is adding an operation that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/SmartDetectorAlertRulesApi.json#L217:7 |
️❌
LintDiff: 1 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
- Linted configuring files (Based on source branch, openapi-validator v1.6.0 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.5 )
- Linted configuring files (Based on target branch, openapi-validator v1.6.0 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.5 )
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema |
the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. New: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/SmartDetectorAlertRulesApi.json#L247 |
'PATCH' operation 'SmartDetectorAlertRules_Patch' should use method name 'Update'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. New: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/SmartDetectorAlertRulesApi.json#L221 |
️⚠️
Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2019-06-preview |
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
NewApiVersionRequired reason: |
"default": { | ||
"description": "Error response describing why the operation failed.", | ||
"schema": { | ||
"$ref": "#/definitions/SmartDetectorErrorResponse" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This error response is different from ARM's guideline. so that is why cause Linter error R4007,
But if your service already implement error response like what your define in SmartDetectorErrorResponse. to keep consistent, we can suppress it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to keep the error response consistent , can you please suppress this error? @akning-ms
Hi, @napolish your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). cc @lirenhe |
@ArcturusZhang to take a look the GO sdk breaking change |
The breaking changes in go SDK are fine and expected |
Hi @napolish, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
Approved from ARM side. |
Hi, @napolish. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
* Adding patch operation in 2019-03-01 API * Adding missing example file * Fixing api version in the example * Fixing parameter name * Removing properties that don't exist in AzureResource
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.