Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

StoragePool RP New Preview API #13970

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
May 6, 2021
Merged

Conversation

harshitha-akkaraju
Copy link
Contributor

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Ensure to copy the existing version into new directory structure for first commit (including refactoring) and then push new changes including version updates in separate commits. This is required to review the changes efficiently.
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @harshitha-akkaraju Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 15, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isAccessible
    Location: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1045


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'iscsiTargets' with immediate parent 'DiskPool', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L889
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction
    Location: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L933
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️❌Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version): 40 Errors, 2 Warnings failed [Detail]

    Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1697:9
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L1496:9
    1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1720:9
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L1508:9
    1024 - ConstraintIsStronger The new version has a more constraining 'enum' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1683:9
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L1492:9
    1024 - ConstraintIsStronger The new version has a more constraining 'enum' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1706:9
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L1504:9
    1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1131:9
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L836:9
    1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1674:5
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L1484:5
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'tier' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1239:7
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L939:7
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'tier' renamed or removed?
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L174:9
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'tpgs' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool.json#L1442:7
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L1151:7
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'tpgs' renamed or removed?
    Old: Microsoft.StoragePool/preview/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool.json#L414:9
    ️️✔️Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

    |:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"storagepool/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-04-01-preview",
    "details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
    |:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"storagepool/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-04-01-preview",
    "details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
    |:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"storagepool/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-04-01-preview",
    "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|

    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 15, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 3ae1665. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	go run ./tools/generator/main.go ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️preview/storagepool/mgmt/2021-04-01-preview/storagepool [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] This is a new package
    • ️✔️preview/storagepool/mgmt/2020-03-15-preview/storagepool [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] This package was removed
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 3ae1665. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:04 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find version for "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-storagepool"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:04 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.1"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:04 INFO autorest --version=3.1.3 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.25 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/storagepool/azure-resourcemanager-storagepool --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.storagepool   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/storagepool/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:33 INFO [CI][Success] Write to ci.yml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:33 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:33 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-storagepool
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:33 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:33 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-05-06 01:54:33 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-storagepool [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-05-06 01:57:16 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-storagepool
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-05-06 01:57:16 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-05-06 01:57:16 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-storagepool-1.0.0-beta.1-javadoc.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-05-06 01:57:16 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-storagepool-1.0.0-beta.1-sources.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-05-06 01:57:16 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-storagepool-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-05-06 01:57:16 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-storagepool-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-05-06 01:57:16 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/13970/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-storagepool/azure-resourcemanager-storagepool-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-storagepool-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-storagepool -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-storagepool-1.0.0-beta.1.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
      ```"}
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 3ae1665. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.4.4 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/storagepool/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-storagepool [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
      cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
      cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
      cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/storagePoolManagement.js → ./dist/arm-storagepool.js...
      cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-storagepool.js in 352ms
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Apr 15, 2021
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @harshitha-akkaraju your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). cc @

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @harshitha-akkaraju, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

    TaskHow to fixPrioritySupport (Microsoft alias)
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHighruowan
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHighraychen, jianyxi
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHighraychen,jianyxi
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhighjianyxi, ruoxuan
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @harshitha-akkaraju, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

    Harshitha Akkaraju and others added 2 commits April 28, 2021 23:03
    * Update readme.md
    
    * Update readme.python.md
    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Pull request contains merge conflicts.

    @akning-ms
    Copy link
    Contributor

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @ChenTanyi ChenTanyi merged commit 3ae1665 into master May 6, 2021
    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    * No changes -- new version directory with old specs
    
    * New API version Changes
    
    * Validation errors
    
    * revisions
    
    * Fixes
    
    * Revisions
    
    * Revisions
    
    * Revisions
    
    * Updates
    
    * Annotating required property
    
    * Availability zone is not required during Disk Pool Creation
    
    * Fixing swagger route typo
    
    * Fixes Avocado errors due to swagger file not being referenced
    
    * Updated python readme
    
    * [python] Update readme.md (Azure#14184)
    
    * Update readme.md
    
    * Update readme.python.md
    
    * Fix merge conflicts
    
    * Swagger linting errors
    
    Co-authored-by: Harshitha Akkaraju <hakkaraj@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: msyyc <70930885+msyyc@users.noreply.github.com>
    @JackTn JackTn deleted the dev/hakkaraj/storagepoolv2preview branch August 17, 2021 06:06
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-BreakingChange-Go
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    6 participants