-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AKS: Review request for Microsoft.ContainerService to add version stable/2021-05-01 #14147
AKS: Review request for Microsoft.ContainerService to add version stable/2021-05-01 #14147
Conversation
…/2021-03-01 to version 2021-05-01
Hi, @levimm Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableUltraSSD Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L2484 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enablePrivateClusterPublicFQDN Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L3380 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L2504 |
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L2574 |
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L3129 |
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L3319 |
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L3414 |
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L3455 |
R3015 - EnumMustHaveType |
Enum must define its type and 'object' type is not allowed due to Autorest refuse to parse it. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L3489 |
R3015 - EnumMustHaveType |
Enum must define its type and 'object' type is not allowed due to Autorest refuse to parse it. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L3789 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'ManagedClusters_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L418 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'AgentPools_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json#L899 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️❌
Cross-Version Breaking Changes: 32 Errors, 2 Warnings failed [Detail]
- Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.8.9)
- current:stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json compared with base:preview/2018-08-01-preview/managedClusters.json
- current:stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json compared with base:stable/2021-03-01/managedClusters.json
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"containerservice/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-05",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"containerservice/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-05",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"containerservice/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-05",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"containerservice/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-05-01-only",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"containerservice/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-05-01-only",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
…01 (#14149) * add APIServerAccessProfile.enablePrivateClusterPublicFQDN in 2021-05-01 api * ref example Co-authored-by: Li Ma <lima2@microsoft.com>
* Add swagger for OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpoints for AKS * fix * lint * update operationId
Co-authored-by: Li Ma <lima2@microsoft.com>
Hi, @levimm your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). cc @PhoenixHe-msft |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
confirmed sdk breaking change is a bug at go-sdk side. This bug will be fixed today. |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Hi ARM reviewer, the CI-BreakingChange-Go is not caused by this pr. Please help review. The individual commits were approved by ARM before. |
"body": { | ||
"value": [ | ||
{ | ||
"category": "azure-resource-management", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @majastrz ,
This is already answered and signed off in #14332 (comment) when merging the PR to dev branch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given that you're ok with the suboptimal API design, the restrictions it causes (as explained by @pilor in the linked comment), and the fact that it was already approved by API review, I'll let it slide.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also keep in mind that this is a one-off exception and it should not be used to justify similar designs elsewhere in the RP.
You should also add a single GET path for Refers to: specification/containerservice/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2021-05-01/managedClusters.json:1876 in 808938d. [](commit_id = 808938d, deletion_comment = False) |
Hi @majastrz , |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Signed off from ARM side.
Co-authored-by: Li Ma <lima2@microsoft.com>
…ble/2021-05-01 (Azure#14147) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerService from version stable/2021-03-01 to version 2021-05-01 * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * add APIServerAccessProfile.enablePrivateClusterPublicFQDN in 2021-05-01 (Azure#14149) * add APIServerAccessProfile.enablePrivateClusterPublicFQDN in 2021-05-01 api * ref example Co-authored-by: Li Ma <lima2@microsoft.com> * Add swagger for OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpoints for AKS (Azure#14332) * Add swagger for OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpoints for AKS * fix * lint * update operationId * aks: add enableUltraSSD in v20210501 api-version (Azure#14354) * update doc for agentpool max count from 100 to 1000 (Azure#14553) Co-authored-by: Li Ma <lima2@microsoft.com> * add readme for new version (Azure#14611) Co-authored-by: Li Ma <lima2@microsoft.com> * fix conflict (Azure#14614) Co-authored-by: Li Ma <lima2@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Li Ma <lima2@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: gossion <guwe@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Zhang <xiazhang@microsoft.com>
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.