[Microsoft.IoTCentral/iotApps] Removal of legacy S1 SKU, S360 Fixes, newer RP API version 2021-06-01 #14311

poanchen · 2021-05-07T18:39:13Z

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

What's the purpose of the update?
- new service onboarding
- new API version
- update existing version for new feature
- update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
- Other, please clarify
When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
- SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
- SDK of Python
- SDK of Java
- SDK of Js
- SDK of Go
- PowerShell
- CLI
- Terraform
- No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version
- Ensure to copy the existing version into new directory structure for first commit (including refactoring) and then push new changes including version updates in separate commits. This is required to review the changes efficiently.
- Adding a new service
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

Removing API(s) in stable version
Removing properties in stable version
Removing API version(s) in stable version
Updating API in stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

…09-01 to version 2021-06-01

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-05-07T18:39:15Z

Hi, @poanchen Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-05-07T18:39:16Z

[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

openapi-pipeline-app · 2021-05-07T18:39:16Z

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

Linted configuring files (Based on source branch, openapi-validator v1.10.0 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.8 )
- iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-2021-06
Linted configuring files (Based on target branch, openapi-validator v1.10.0 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.8 )
- iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md tag:default

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Rule	Message
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'Resource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L603
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'CloudError' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L644
⚠️ R2066 - PostOperationIdContainsUrlVerb	OperationId should contain the verb: 'apptemplates' in:'Apps_ListTemplates'. Consider updating the operationId Location: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L419

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ModelValidation.

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️❌Cross-Version Breaking Changes: 11 Errors, 2 Warnings failed [Detail]

Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.8.11)
- current:stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json compared with base:stable/2018-09-01/iotcentral.json
- current:stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json compared with base:preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:

Rule	Message
`❌` 1019 - RemovedEnumValue	The new version is removing enum value(s) 'F1, S1' from the old version. New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L540:9 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2018-09-01/iotcentral.json#L523:9

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with latest preview version:

Rule	Message
`❌` 1005 - RemovedPath	The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.IoTCentral/IoTApps/{resourceName}' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L37:5
`❌` 1005 - RemovedPath	The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.IoTCentral/IoTApps' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L238:5
`❌` 1005 - RemovedPath	The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.IoTCentral/IoTApps' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L278:5
`❌` 1019 - RemovedEnumValue	The new version is removing enum value(s) 'F1, S1' from the old version. New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L540:9 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L439:9
`❌` 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged	The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'. New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L802:9 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L670:9
`❌` 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'code' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L647:7 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L541:7
`❌` 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'message' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L647:7 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L541:7
`❌` 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'target' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L647:7 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L541:7
`❌` 1036 - ConstraintChanged	The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L501:9 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L415:9
`❌` 1036 - ConstraintChanged	The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L505:9 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L420:9
⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged	The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'. New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L359:13 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L359:13
⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged	The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'. New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L482:13 Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/preview/2017-07-01-privatepreview/iotcentral.json#L396:13

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️️✔️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

The following tags are being changed in this PR

iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2021-06

The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-06",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-06",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-06",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|

️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2021-05-07T18:39:17Z

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.

️️✔️[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - iotcentral/mgmt/2018-09-01/iotcentral - v55.5.0
️✔️azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-iotcentral - 9.0.0b1

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0d3b1a8. SDK Automation 14.0.0

warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-5.0
command	autorest --version=V2 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied

️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.IotCentral [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- Microsoft.Azure.Management.IotCentral.3.1.0.nupkg
- Microsoft.Azure.Management.IotCentral.3.1.0.symbols.nupkg

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0d3b1a8. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-iotcentral [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- azure_mgmt_iotcentral-1.0.0b1-py2.py3-none-any.whl
- azure-mgmt-iotcentral-1.0.0b1.zip
```
info	[Changelog] **Features**
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Model App has a new parameter state
info	[Changelog]   - Model AppPatch has a new parameter state
```

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0d3b1a8. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:30 INFO [VERSION][Found] current version "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral;1.0.0-beta.1;1.0.0-beta.2"
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:30 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.2"
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:30 INFO autorest --version=3.6.0 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.37 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/iotcentral/azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.iotcentral   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL  ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:59 INFO [CI][Skip] ci.yml already has module azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:59 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:59 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:59 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:59 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:59 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module sdk/iotcentral
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-14 02:55:59 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom

️✔️azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-14 02:57:49 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-14 02:57:49 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-14 02:57:49 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-14 02:57:49 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-14 02:57:49 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/14311/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral/azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral-1.0.0-beta.2.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
```"}

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0d3b1a8. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️iotcentral/mgmt/2018-09-01/iotcentral [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
```
info	[Changelog] No exported changes
```

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0d3b1a8. SDK Automation 14.0.0

warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.7.0 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/iotcentral/resource-manager/readme.md

️✔️@azure/arm-iotcentral [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

azure-arm-iotcentral-4.2.1.tgz

cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/iotCentralClient.js → ./dist/arm-iotcentral.js...
cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-iotcentral.js in 228ms

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0d3b1a8. Schema Automation 14.0.0

command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️iotcentral [View full logs] [Release Schema Changes]

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-05-07T18:42:32Z

Hi @poanchen, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

Task	How to fix	Priority	Support (Microsoft alias)
Avocado	Fix-Avocado	High	ruowan
Semantic validation	Fix-SemanticValidation-Error	High	raychen, jianyxi
Model validation	Fix-ModelValidation-Error	High	raychen,jianyxi
LintDiff	Fix-LintDiff	high	jianyxi, ruoxuan

If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

poanchen · 2021-08-03T23:32:08Z

@erich-wang please let us know if you have any feedback to this PR. Our code changes + arm manifest is already in prod. We have also tested the newly generated SDK against both canary + prod. So we should be good to merge this swagger changes to add a new RP api version 2021-06-01. As we will have other changes coming later on, we will not trigger an update to SDK until down the road. Thanks.

poanchen · 2021-08-09T03:33:18Z

@akning-ms please let us know how we can move forward and close this PR thanks

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-08-09T05:44:52Z

Hi @poanchen, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

akning-ms · 2021-08-09T05:46:39Z

@akning-ms please let us know how we can move forward and close this PR thanks

Hi @poanchen, Your PR is not ready for merge on below point:

ARM sign off refer to: ARM API Review Checklist in first comment
Breaking change review board approval, refer to: [Microsoft.IoTCentral/iotApps] Removal of legacy S1 SKU, S360 Fixes, newer RP API version 2021-06-01 #14311 (comment)
due to below:

❌ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue | The new version is removing enum value(s) 'F1, S1' from the old version.
New: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2021-06-01/iotcentral.json#L540:9
Old: Microsoft.IoTCentral/stable/2018-09-01/iotcentral.json#L523:9

jorgecotillo · 2021-08-23T21:09:06Z

Let us know if this PR still needs some feedback, it's been open for quite some time

poanchen · 2021-08-23T23:34:00Z

@jorgecotillo We are in the process of getting our breaking changes approved by the ARM team. Will reach out once that is approved and we should be able to merge this.

poanchen · 2021-08-30T17:37:21Z

@jorgecotillo @akning-ms

Breaking changes already got approved. Please merge this PR whenever you guys see this. Thanks tons!

poanchen · 2021-09-02T17:48:19Z

ping again here
@jorgecotillo @akning-ms

let me us know what else we need to do thanks!

akning-ms · 2021-09-03T08:31:38Z

Hi @poanchen, you may need ping ARM on call person to review if urgent as below guideline:
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

And can we know whether this version for your service end will be deployed on PROD

poanchen · 2021-09-07T21:03:45Z

@jorgecotillo @akning-ms

We don't have urgency to merge this PR but we do want to get this PR moving forward. Please take a look when you guys have time. Thanks!

j5lim

Approved from ARM side.

poanchen · 2021-09-13T20:40:11Z

@jorgecotillo @akning-ms

Now that we also got the ARM team approval. Can we move this forward? and merge this PR thanks!

…cy S1 SKU, S360 Fixes, newer RP API version 2021-06-01 (#1899) Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#14311 [ReCreate this PR](https://github.com/azure-resource-manager-schemas/compare/main...AzureSDKAutomation:sdkAuto/iotcentral?expand=1)

…newer RP API version 2021-06-01 (Azure#14311) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.IoTCentral from version stable/2018-09-01 to version 2021-06-01 * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * remove legacy sku S1 * update template in example to use M3 template name * add suppress for R4009 and R3018 * add state * update * should be read only * update example * Update iotcentral.json temporary changing this for further testing in canary. * removal of f1 and deleted state

poanchen added 3 commits May 7, 2021 11:33

Adds base for updating Microsoft.IoTCentral from version stable/2018-…

3d0473f

…09-01 to version 2021-06-01

Updates readme

3008928

Updates API version in new specs and examples

ab1be54

poanchen added the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label May 7, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the CI-FixRequiredOnFailure label May 7, 2021

poanchen added 2 commits May 7, 2021 14:27

remove legacy sku S1

df9dc3b

update template in example to use M3 template name

9e657c0

openapi-pipeline-app bot added CI-FixRequiredOnFailure and removed CI-FixRequiredOnFailure labels May 7, 2021

add suppress for R4009 and R3018

41ce775

openapi-pipeline-app bot added CI-FixRequiredOnFailure and removed CI-FixRequiredOnFailure labels May 7, 2021

poanchen force-pushed the dev-iotcentral-Microsoft.IoTCentral-2021-06-01 branch from 696e1b3 to 41ce775 Compare May 8, 2021 04:16

poanchen added 3 commits May 7, 2021 21:19

add state

ecde128

update

8d207d1

should be read only

0b016cc

poanchen changed the title ~~Dev iotcentral microsoft.io t central 2021 06 01~~ [Azure IoT Central] Removal of legacy S1 SKU, S360 Fixes, newer RP API version 2021-06-01 May 13, 2021

erich-wang assigned akning-ms Aug 6, 2021

akning-ms added the BreakingChangeReviewRequired label Aug 9, 2021

akning-ms unassigned erich-wang Aug 11, 2021

JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Aug 25, 2021

j5lim approved these changes Sep 13, 2021

View reviewed changes

j5lim added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Sep 13, 2021

akning-ms merged commit 0d3b1a8 into Azure:main Sep 14, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot removed the CI-BreakingChange-Python-Track2 label Sep 14, 2021

This was referenced Sep 14, 2021

[ReleasePR Microsoft.Azure.Management.IotCentral] [Go] Add batch tag 03/31/2022 Azure/azure-sdk-for-net#23975

Closed

[ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-iotcentral] [Go] Add batch tag 03/31/2022 Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#24113

Closed

gansvv mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2021

Updated IoT Central Java SDK examples for 2021-06-01 release Azure-Samples/azure-iot-central-arm-sdk-samples#18

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[Microsoft.IoTCentral/iotApps] Removal of legacy S1 SKU, S360 Fixes, newer RP API version 2021-06-01 #14311

[Microsoft.IoTCentral/iotApps] Removal of legacy S1 SKU, S360 Fixes, newer RP API version 2021-06-01 #14311

poanchen commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented May 7, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented May 7, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented May 7, 2021

poanchen commented Aug 3, 2021

poanchen commented Aug 9, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Aug 9, 2021

akning-ms commented Aug 9, 2021

jorgecotillo commented Aug 23, 2021

poanchen commented Aug 23, 2021

poanchen commented Aug 30, 2021

poanchen commented Sep 2, 2021

akning-ms commented Sep 3, 2021 •

edited

Loading

poanchen commented Sep 7, 2021

j5lim left a comment

poanchen commented Sep 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading

[Microsoft.IoTCentral/iotApps] Removal of legacy S1 SKU, S360 Fixes, newer RP API version 2021-06-01 #14311

[Microsoft.IoTCentral/iotApps] Removal of legacy S1 SKU, S360 Fixes, newer RP API version 2021-06-01 #14311

Conversation

poanchen commented May 7, 2021 • edited Loading

Changelog

Contribution checklist:

ARM API Review Checklist

Breaking Change Review Checklist

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented May 7, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented May 7, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 7, 2021 • edited Loading

Swagger Validation Report

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 7, 2021 • edited Loading

Swagger Generation Artifacts

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented May 7, 2021

poanchen commented Aug 3, 2021

poanchen commented Aug 9, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Aug 9, 2021

akning-ms commented Aug 9, 2021

jorgecotillo commented Aug 23, 2021

poanchen commented Aug 23, 2021

poanchen commented Aug 30, 2021

poanchen commented Sep 2, 2021

akning-ms commented Sep 3, 2021 • edited Loading

poanchen commented Sep 7, 2021

j5lim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

poanchen commented Sep 13, 2021 • edited Loading

poanchen commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

akning-ms commented Sep 3, 2021 •

edited

Loading

poanchen commented Sep 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading