Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Watchlists Stable Version 2021-04-01 #14843

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2021
Merged

Added Watchlists Stable Version 2021-04-01 #14843

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2021

Conversation

hassanchawiche
Copy link
Contributor

@hassanchawiche hassanchawiche commented Jun 16, 2021

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Ensure to copy the existing version into new directory structure for first commit (including refactoring) and then push new changes including version updates in separate commits. This is required to review the changes efficiently.
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 16, 2021

Swagger Validation Report

️❌BreakingChange: 4 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule Message
1038 - AddedPath The new version is adding a path that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Watchlists.json#L37:5
1038 - AddedPath The new version is adding a path that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Watchlists.json#L88:5
1038 - AddedPath The new version is adding a path that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Watchlists.json#L240:5
1038 - AddedPath The new version is adding a path that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Watchlists.json#L294:5
️⚠️LintDiff: 4 Warnings warning [Detail]
The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
Rule Message
⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'watchlistItems' with immediate parent 'Watchlist', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Watchlists.json#L621
⚠️ R3017 - GuidUsage Guid used in model definition 'UserInfo' for property 'objectId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Watchlists.json#L703
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDeleted
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Watchlists.json#L550
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDeleted
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Watchlists.json#L652


The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule Message
R4017 - TopLevelResourcesListBySubscription The top-level resource 'Incident' does not have list by subscription operation, please add it.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Incidents.json#L1641
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.SecurityInsights/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/operations.json#L37
R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'CloudError' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Incidents.json#L1039
R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'IncidentAlertList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Incidents.json#L1698
R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'IncidentBookmarkList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Incidents.json#L1713
R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'IncidentCommentList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Incidents.json#L1744
R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'IncidentEntitiesResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Incidents.json#L1795
R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'IncidentList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Incidents.json#L1924
R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RelationList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/stable/2021-04-01/Incidents.json#L3147
R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'Resource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
Location: resource-manager/common/1.0/types.json#L52
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-04-01-only",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-04-01-only",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|


The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-04-01-only",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|

️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @hassanchawiche Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 16, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-go - securityinsight/mgmt/v1.0/securityinsight - v55.3.0
    +	Package was removed
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - securityinsight/mgmt/2020-01-01/securityinsight - v55.3.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/securityinsight/mgmt/2019-01-01-preview/securityinsight - v55.3.0
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 13cf714. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-5.0
      command	autorest --version=V2 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
    • ️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.SecurityInsights [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 13cf714. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️securityinsight/mgmt/v1.0/securityinsight [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] This package was removed
    • ️✔️securityinsight/mgmt/2020-01-01/securityinsight [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/securityinsight/mgmt/2019-01-01-preview/securityinsight [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### New Content
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DomainWhoisClient.Get(context.Context, string, string) (EnrichmentDomainWhois, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `IPGeodataClient.GetPreparer(context.Context, string, string) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DomainWhoisClient.GetPreparer(context.Context, string, string) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DomainWhoisClient.GetSender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DomainWhoisClient.GetResponder(*http.Response) (EnrichmentDomainWhois, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `IPGeodataClient.GetResponder(*http.Response) (EnrichmentIPGeodata, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `IPGeodataClient.Get(context.Context, string, string) (EnrichmentIPGeodata, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewDomainWhoisClient(string) DomainWhoisClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewIPGeodataClientWithBaseURI(string, string) IPGeodataClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewIPGeodataClient(string) IPGeodataClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `IPGeodataClient.GetSender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewDomainWhoisClientWithBaseURI(string, string) DomainWhoisClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `DomainWhoisClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `EnrichmentDomainWhois`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `EnrichmentDomainWhoisContact`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `EnrichmentDomainWhoisContacts`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `EnrichmentDomainWhoisDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `EnrichmentDomainWhoisRegistrarDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `EnrichmentIPGeodata`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `IPGeodataClient`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 28 additive change(s).
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 13cf714. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-securityinsight [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 13cf714. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.7.0 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-securityinsight [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
      cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
      cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
      cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/securityInsights.js → ./dist/arm-securityinsight.js...
      cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-securityinsight.js in 425ms
    ️️✔️ azure-cli-extensions succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 13cf714. Azure CLI Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	npx n 12
      command	python3 -m venv venv
      command	pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel pip
      command	pip install pathlib jinja2 msrestazure
      command	autorest --az --use=@autorest/az@latest --version=3.0.6271 --clear-output-folder=true --azure-cli-extension-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-cli-extensions ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/AllOfWhenYouMeantRef): Schema 'AwsCloudTrailDataConnectorDataTypes-logs' is using an 'allOf' instead of a $ref. This creates a wasteful anonymous type when generating code.
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/AllOfWhenYouMeantRef): Schema 'OfficeDataConnectorDataTypes-exchange' is using an 'allOf' instead of a $ref. This creates a wasteful anonymous type when generating code.
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/AllOfWhenYouMeantRef): Schema 'OfficeDataConnectorDataTypes-sharePoint' is using an 'allOf' instead of a $ref. This creates a wasteful anonymous type when generating code.
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/AllOfWhenYouMeantRef): Schema 'OfficeDataConnectorDataTypes-teams' is using an 'allOf' instead of a $ref. This creates a wasteful anonymous type when generating code.
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/AllOfWhenYouMeantRef): Schema 'TIDataConnectorDataTypes-indicators' is using an 'allOf' instead of a $ref. This creates a wasteful anonymous type when generating code.
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'ActionsList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'AlertRuleTemplatesList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'AlertRulesList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'BookmarkList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'CloudError' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'DataConnectorList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'IncidentCommentList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'IncidentList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'OfficeConsentList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'Operation' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'OperationsList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'Resource' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/SchemaMissingType): The schema 'ResourceWithEtag' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/CheckDuplicateSchemas): Checking for duplicate schemas, this could take a (long) while.  Run with --verbose for more detail.
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (PreCheck/PropertyRedeclarationWarning): Schema 'MCASDataConnectorDataTypes' has a property 'alerts' that is already declared the parent schema 'AlertsDataTypeOfDataConnector' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from MCASDataConnectorDataTypes
      cmdout	[Autorest] WARNING (): cli.auto-parameter-hidden is not true, skip visibility cleaner
      cmderr	[Autorest] BELOW TEST SCENARIO SECTION CAN BE USED IN readme.cli.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] --------------------------------------------------------
      cmderr	[Autorest]   test-scenario:
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Actions/put/Creates or updates an action of alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Actions/get/Get all actions of alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Actions/get/Get an action of alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Actions/delete/Delete an action of alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRules/put/Creates or updates a Fusion alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRules/put/Creates or updates a MicrosoftSecurityIncidentCreation rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRules/put/Creates or updates a Scheduled alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRules/get/Get a Fusion alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRules/get/Get a MicrosoftSecurityIncidentCreation rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRules/get/Get a Scheduled alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRules/get/Get all alert rules.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRules/delete/Delete an alert rule.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRuleTemplates/get/Get alert rule template by Id.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /AlertRuleTemplates/get/Get all alert rule templates.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Bookmarks/put/Creates or updates a bookmark.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Bookmarks/get/Get a bookmark.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Bookmarks/get/Get all bookmarks.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Bookmarks/delete/Delete a bookmark.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/put/Creates or updates an Office365 data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/put/Creates or updates an Threat Intelligence Platform data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get a ASC data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get a MCAS data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get a MDATP data connector
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get a TI data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get all data connectors.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get an AAD data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get an AATP data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get an AwsCloudTrail data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/get/Get an Office365 data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /DataConnectors/delete/Delete an Office365 data connector.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /IncidentComments/put/Creates an incident comment.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /IncidentComments/get/Get all incident comments.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /IncidentComments/get/Get an incident comment.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Incidents/put/Creates or updates an incident.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Incidents/get/Get all incidents.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Incidents/get/Get an incident.
      cmderr	[Autorest]     - name: /Incidents/delete/Delete an incident.
      cmderr	[Autorest] --------------------------------------------------------
    • ️✔️securityinsight [View full logs]  [Release Azure CLI Changes]
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 13cf714. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️securityinsights [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @hassanchawiche hassanchawiche changed the title [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.SecurityInsights to add version stable/2021-04-01 Added Watchlists Stable Version 2021-04-01 Jun 16, 2021
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    NewApiVersionRequired reason:

    A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support.

    EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @hassanchawiche your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com).

    @hassanchawiche
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @allenjzhang / @chiragg4u :
    I created this new PR to make the review easier. As you can see, it has 2 commits.

    • The 1st commit is the copy-paste of existing watchlist spec version 2021-03-01-preview.
    • The 2d commit has the changes for the stable version.

    @hassanchawiche hassanchawiche requested a review from chiragg4u June 16, 2021 14:52
    @chiragg4u
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Thank you for copying the existing version into new folder for first commit. It helps in reviewing the change. Changes looks good from ARM perspective, signedoff, please follow the process given @ https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_wiki/wikis/internal.wiki/212/Swagger-PR-Review to continue

    @chiragg4u chiragg4u added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jun 16, 2021
    @hassanchawiche hassanchawiche added the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Jun 16, 2021
    @ruowan ruowan assigned leni-msft and unassigned ruowan Jun 18, 2021
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @hassanchawiche, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-BreakingChange-Go
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    6 participants