New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 #15956

sirireddy12 · 2021-09-08T07:21:48Z

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

What's the purpose of the update?
- new API version - 2021-10-01
When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month. - October
When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month. - September 9th
If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
- SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
- SDK of Python
- SDK of Java
- SDK of Js
- SDK of Go
- PowerShell
- CLI
- Terraform
- No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

Change to data plane APIs

Adding new properties

All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
- Adding a new service
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version
  -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

Removing API(s) in a stable version
Removing properties in a stable version
Removing API version(s) in a stable version
Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-09-08T07:21:50Z

Hi, @sirireddy12 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-09-08T07:21:51Z

[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

openapi-pipeline-app · 2021-09-08T07:21:53Z

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.0)
- current:preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json compared with base:preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json

️⚠️LintDiff: 4 Warnings warning [Detail]

Linted configuring files (Based on source branch, openapi-validator v1.10.1 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.10 )
- hybridkubernetes/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-2021-10-01
- hybridkubernetes/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-2021-04-01-preview
Linted configuring files (Based on target branch, openapi-validator v1.10.1 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.10 )
- hybridkubernetes/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-2021-04-01-preview

The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

Rule	Message
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L241
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: clientProxy Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L746
⚠️ R4020 - DescriptiveDescriptionRequired	The value provided for description is not descriptive enough. Accurate and descriptive description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L751
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'ListClusterUserCredentialProperties' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L727

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
`❌` R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat	The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L563
`❌` R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat	The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L576
`❌` R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema	The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Kubernetes/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L382
`❌` R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema	The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Kubernetes/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L395
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'OperationList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L420
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'display' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L446
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'CredentialResults' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L626
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'HybridConnectionConfig' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L701
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'OperationList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L433
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'display' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L459
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'CredentialResults' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L656
`❌` R4037 - MissingTypeObject	The schema 'HybridConnectionConfig' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L748
⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName	Since operation 'Operations_Get' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L385
⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName	Since operation 'Operations_Get' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L398
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L34
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L97
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L150
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L191
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L302
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L345
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L34
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L100
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L163
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L204
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L254
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L315
⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ConnectedClusterModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'ConnectedCluster' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L358
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: clientProxy Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L846
⚠️ R4020 - DescriptiveDescriptionRequired	The value provided for description is not descriptive enough. Accurate and descriptive description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L851
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'ListClusterUserCredentialsProperties' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L827

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ModelValidation.

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️⚠️Cross-Version Breaking Changes: 7 Warnings warning [Detail]

Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.0)
- current:stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json compared with base:stable/2021-03-01/connectedClusters.json
- current:stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json compared with base:preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with latest preview version:

Rule	Message
⚠️ 1005 - RemovedPath	The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourcegroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Kubernetes/connectedClusters/{clusterName}/listClusterUserCredentials' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L251:5
⚠️ 1006 - RemovedDefinition	The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'ListClusterUserCredentialsProperties' removed or renamed? New: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L419:3 Old: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L426:3
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'privateLinkState' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L553:7 Old: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L560:7
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'privateLinkScopeResourceId' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L553:7 Old: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L560:7
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'privateLinkState' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L698:7 Old: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L722:7
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'privateLinkScopeResourceId' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L698:7 Old: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L722:7
⚠️ 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged	The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/connectedClusters.json#L95:7 Old: Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/connectedClusters.json#L98:7

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️️✔️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

The following tags are being changed in this PR

️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2021-09-08T07:21:53Z

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.

️️✔️[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - hybridkubernetes/mgmt/2021-03-01/hybridkubernetes - v57.2.0
️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/hybridkubernetes/mgmt/2021-04-01-preview/hybridkubernetes - v57.2.0
️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/hybridkubernetes/mgmt/2020-01-01-preview/hybridkubernetes - v57.2.0
️✔️azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-hybridkubernetes - Approved - 1.0.0

-	Model ConnectedClusterPatch has a new signature
-	Removed operation ConnectedClusterOperations.update

️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - hybridkubernetes/mgmt/2021-10-01/hybridkubernetes - v57.2.0

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 9a19506. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-hybridkubernetes [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- azure_mgmt_hybridkubernetes-1.0.0b1-py2.py3-none-any.whl
- azure-mgmt-hybridkubernetes-1.0.0b1.zip
```
info	[Changelog] **Features**
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Added operation ConnectedClusterOperations.list_cluster_user_credential
```

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 9a19506. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:10 INFO [VERSION][Found] current version "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes;1.0.0-beta.1;1.0.0-beta.2"
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:10 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.2"
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:10 INFO autorest --version=3.6.0 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.37 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/hybridkubernetes/azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.hybridkubernetes   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL  ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/hybridkubernetes/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:41 INFO [CI][Skip] ci.yml already has module azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:41 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:41 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:41 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:41 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:41 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module sdk/hybridkubernetes
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-11 05:35:41 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom

️✔️azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-11 05:37:16 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-11 05:37:16 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-11 05:37:16 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes-1.0.0-beta.2-sources.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-11 05:37:16 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-11 05:37:16 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-11 05:37:16 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/15956/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes/azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes-1.0.0-beta.2.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
```"}

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 9a19506. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️hybridkubernetes/mgmt/2021-10-01/hybridkubernetes [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
```
info	[Changelog] This is a new package
```
️✔️hybridkubernetes/mgmt/2021-03-01/hybridkubernetes [View full logs]
```
info	[Changelog] No exported changes
```
️✔️preview/hybridkubernetes/mgmt/2021-04-01-preview/hybridkubernetes [View full logs]
```
info	[Changelog] No exported changes
```
️✔️preview/hybridkubernetes/mgmt/2020-01-01-preview/hybridkubernetes [View full logs]
```
info	[Changelog] No exported changes
```

️🔄 azure-sdk-for-net inProgress [Detail]

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 9a19506. Schema Automation 14.0.0

command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[generateScript.sh] (node:2381) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input
cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at JSON.parse (<anonymous>)
cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Object.readJsonFile (/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/generator/utils.ts:174:17)
cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at getCurrentTemplateRefs (/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/generator/generate.ts:290:21)
cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/generator/generate.ts:297:29
cmderr	[generateScript.sh] (Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)
cmderr	[generateScript.sh] (node:2381) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection. This error originated either by throwing inside of an async function without a catch block, or by rejecting a promise which was not handled with .catch(). To terminate the node process on unhandled promise rejection, use the CLI flag `--unhandled-rejections=strict` (see https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#cli_unhandled_rejections_mode). (rejection id: 1)
cmderr	[generateScript.sh] (node:2381) [DEP0018] DeprecationWarning: Unhandled promise rejections are deprecated. In the future, promise rejections that are not handled will terminate the Node.js process with a non-zero exit code.

️✔️hybridkubernetes [View full logs] [Release Schema Changes]

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-09-08T07:23:34Z

Hi @sirireddy12, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

Task	How to fix	Priority	Support (Microsoft alias)
Avocado	Fix-Avocado	High	ruowan
Semantic validation	Fix-SemanticValidation-Error	High	raychen, jianyxi
Model validation	Fix-ModelValidation-Error	High	raychen,jianyxi
LintDiff	Fix-LintDiff	high	jianyxi, ruoxuan

If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

…into newga

...soft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/examples/ConnectedClustersListClusterCredentialResult.json

...ubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/examples/ConnectedClustersListClusterCredentialResultNonAad.json

krdhruva

🕐

rapatchi · 2021-09-09T13:17:24Z

  "clientProxy": true

this should be false

Refers to: specification/hybridkubernetes/resource-manager/Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/examples/ConnectedClustersListClusterCredentialsResult.json:9 in 3c5ef91. [](commit_id = 3c5ef91, deletion_comment = True)

rapatchi · 2021-09-09T13:19:38Z

{

The file names are little confusing.
Could you rename them to some consistent format?.

....CSPAAD.json
....CSPToken.json
.....HPAAD.json
.....HPToken.json ?.

Refers to: specification/hybridkubernetes/resource-manager/Microsoft.Kubernetes/preview/2021-04-01-preview/examples/ConnectedClustersListClusterCredentialsResult.json:1 in 3c5ef91. [](commit_id = 3c5ef91, deletion_comment = True)

...soft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/examples/ConnectedClustersListClusterCredentialResult.json

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-09-10T03:21:42Z

Hi, @sirireddy12 your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com).

majastrz · 2021-09-10T21:24:54Z

It doesn't look like you structured your history to make it easy to review the delta for us. These were the instructions in the PR title:

Can you also link to the previously approved API so I can review the delta?

rapatchi · 2021-09-11T02:18:00Z

It doesn't look like you structured your history to make it easy to review the delta for us. These were the instructions in the PR title:

Can you also link to the previously approved API so I can review the delta?

We have taken the current GA api-version as base with no change from here.
And as we want to take “listClusterUserCredentials” defined here to GA.
The only change which we did while taking this API to GA is rename it from “listClusterUserCredentials” to “listClusterUserCredential”. As it should have been that in the first place.

Hope this helps.

majastrz

Signed off from ARM side.

majastrz · 2021-09-11T02:46:01Z

Hope this helps.

Yes, it does. Thanks!

Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#15956 [ReCreate this PR](https://github.com/azure-resource-manager-schemas/compare/main...AzureSDKAutomation:sdkAuto/hybridkubernetes?expand=1)

sikasire added 2 commits September 8, 2021 12:38

New GA api-version changes- 2021-01-01

124e453

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

099cfa1

openapi-assignment-bot bot assigned leni-msft Sep 8, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the CI-FixRequiredOnFailure label Sep 8, 2021

openapi-sdkautomation bot mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2021

[AutoPR track2_azure-mgmt-hybridkubernetes] New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-python#7249

Closed

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the CI-BreakingChange-Python-Track2 label Sep 8, 2021

openapi-sdkautomation bot mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2021

[AutoPR azure-resourcemanager-hybridkubernetes] New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-java#10615

Closed

readme changes

18c9440

sirireddy12 requested a review from ArcturusZhang as a code owner September 8, 2021 07:29

openapi-sdkautomation bot mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2021

[AutoPR hybridkubernetes/resource-manager] New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 AzureSDKAutomation/azure-resource-manager-schemas#4656

Draft

sikasire added 4 commits September 8, 2021 13:09

readme changes

cbcf22b

add systemdata definition

a6b7c30

system data ref fix

0b8a36a

system data ref fix

589f50d

openapi-sdkautomation bot mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2021

[AutoPR hybridkubernetes] New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 AzureSDKAutomation/azure-resource-manager-schemas#4660

Closed

sikasire added 4 commits September 8, 2021 14:46

fix

3bc2a30

fix

2069fd6

fix

2957a20

Merge branch 'newga' of https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs …

9634cfd

…into newga

openapi-pipeline-app bot added CI-FixRequiredOnFailure and removed CI-FixRequiredOnFailure labels Sep 8, 2021

sikasire added 4 commits September 8, 2021 15:58

fix

ab3e135

remove empty patch section

0ca5404

Merge branch 'newga' of https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs …

0c91344

…into newga

revert patch section

96c6537

rapatchi approved these changes Sep 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'newga' of https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs …

ae4f8d2

…into newga

krdhruva reviewed Sep 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

...soft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/examples/ConnectedClustersListClusterCredentialResult.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

krdhruva reviewed Sep 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

...ubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/examples/ConnectedClustersListClusterCredentialResultNonAad.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

krdhruva suggested changes Sep 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

sikasire added 2 commits September 9, 2021 17:21

Fixing listClusterUserCreds examples

d6c987b

hide creds

3c5ef91

rapatchi reviewed Sep 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

...soft.Kubernetes/stable/2021-10-01/examples/ConnectedClustersListClusterCredentialResult.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

example file naming changes and clientProxy flag correction

410da54

rapatchi approved these changes Sep 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

krdhruva approved these changes Sep 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

openapi-workflow-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 10, 2021

majastrz added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Sep 11, 2021

majastrz approved these changes Sep 11, 2021

View reviewed changes

leni-msft merged commit 9a19506 into main Sep 11, 2021

leni-msft deleted the newga branch September 11, 2021 05:29

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 #15956

New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 #15956

sirireddy12 commented Sep 8, 2021 •

edited by leni-msft

Loading

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 8, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 8, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2021

krdhruva left a comment

rapatchi commented Sep 9, 2021

rapatchi commented Sep 9, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2021

majastrz commented Sep 10, 2021

rapatchi commented Sep 11, 2021 •

edited

Loading

majastrz left a comment

majastrz commented Sep 11, 2021

New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 #15956

New GA version changes - 2021-10-01 #15956

Conversation

sirireddy12 commented Sep 8, 2021 • edited by leni-msft Loading

Changelog

Contribution checklist:

ARM API Review Checklist

Breaking Change Review Checklist

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 8, 2021 • edited Loading

Swagger Validation Report

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 8, 2021 • edited Loading

Swagger Generation Artifacts

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2021

krdhruva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rapatchi commented Sep 9, 2021

rapatchi commented Sep 9, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2021

majastrz commented Sep 10, 2021

rapatchi commented Sep 11, 2021 • edited Loading

majastrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

majastrz commented Sep 11, 2021

sirireddy12 commented Sep 8, 2021 •

edited by leni-msft

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 8, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 8, 2021 •

edited

Loading

rapatchi commented Sep 11, 2021 •

edited

Loading