Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[servicebus]Update readme.python.md #16114

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 22, 2021
Merged

[servicebus]Update readme.python.md #16114

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 22, 2021

Conversation

msyyc
Copy link
Member

@msyyc msyyc commented Sep 22, 2021

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @msyyc Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 22, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for LintDiff.
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 22, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⌛[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking pending [Detail]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 1ebd7cb. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-5.0
      command	autorest --version=V2 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/servicebus/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
    • Microsoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBus [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/servicebus/Microsoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBus/tests/Tests/ScenarioTests.StandardToPremiumMigrationTests_withentities.CRUD.cs(29,67): error CS1061: 'ServiceBusManagementClient' does not contain a definition for 'PremiumMessagingRegions' and no accessible extension method 'PremiumMessagingRegions' accepting a first argument of type 'ServiceBusManagementClient' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/servicebus/Microsoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBus/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBus.Tests.csproj]
      cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/servicebus/Microsoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBus/tests/Tests/ScenarioTests.StandardToPremiumMigrationTests_withentities.CRUD.cs(29,67): error CS1061: 'ServiceBusManagementClient' does not contain a definition for 'PremiumMessagingRegions' and no accessible extension method 'PremiumMessagingRegions' accepting a first argument of type 'ServiceBusManagementClient' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/servicebus/Microsoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBus/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBus.Tests.csproj]
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-net]: dotnet
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 1ebd7cb. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-servicebus [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model NetworkRuleSet has a new parameter trusted_service_access_enabled
      info	[Changelog]   - Model NetworkRuleSet has a new parameter public_network_access
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SBQueue has a new parameter max_message_size_in_kilobytes
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SBNamespace has a new parameter disable_local_auth
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SBNamespace has a new parameter status
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SBSubscription has a new parameter client_affine_properties
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SBSubscription has a new parameter is_client_affine
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SBTopic has a new parameter max_message_size_in_kilobytes
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SBNamespaceUpdateParameters has a new parameter disable_local_auth
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SBNamespaceUpdateParameters has a new parameter status
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 1ebd7cb. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:50:31 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find version for "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:50:31 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.1"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:50:31 INFO autorest --version=3.6.0 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.37 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/servicebus/azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.servicebus.generated   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL  ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/servicebus/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:51:07 INFO [CI][Success] Write to ci.yml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:51:07 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:51:07 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:51:07 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:51:07 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module sdk/servicebus
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-23 02:51:07 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-23 02:53:25 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-23 02:53:25 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-23 02:53:25 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-23 02:53:25 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-23 02:53:25 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/16114/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated/azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated-1.0.0-beta.1.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
      ```"}
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 1ebd7cb. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️servicebus/mgmt/2017-04-01/servicebus [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️servicebus/mgmt/2015-08-01/servicebus [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/servicebus/mgmt/2018-01-01-preview/servicebus [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### New Content
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkRuleSetListResultIterator.Response() NetworkRuleSetListResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NamespacesClient.ListNetworkRuleSets(context.Context, string, string) (NetworkRuleSetListResultPage, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewNetworkRuleSetListResultPage(NetworkRuleSetListResult, func(context.Context, NetworkRuleSetListResult) (NetworkRuleSetListResult, error)) NetworkRuleSetListResultPage`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkRuleSetListResultIterator.NotDone() bool`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkRuleSetListResultPage.Response() NetworkRuleSetListResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*NetworkRuleSetListResultIterator.Next() error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewNetworkRuleSetListResultIterator(NetworkRuleSetListResultPage) NetworkRuleSetListResultIterator`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*NetworkRuleSetListResultIterator.NextWithContext(context.Context) error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkRuleSetListResultPage.NotDone() bool`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NamespacesClient.ListNetworkRuleSetsResponder(*http.Response) (NetworkRuleSetListResult, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*NetworkRuleSetListResultPage.Next() error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NamespacesClient.ListNetworkRuleSetsSender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkRuleSetListResultPage.Values() []NetworkRuleSet`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkRuleSetListResultIterator.Value() NetworkRuleSet`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkRuleSetListResult.IsEmpty() bool`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*NetworkRuleSetListResultPage.NextWithContext(context.Context) error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NamespacesClient.ListNetworkRuleSetsPreparer(context.Context, string, string) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NamespacesClient.ListNetworkRuleSetsComplete(context.Context, string, string) (NetworkRuleSetListResultIterator, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `NetworkRuleSetListResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `NetworkRuleSetListResultIterator`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `NetworkRuleSetListResultPage`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Status` in struct `SBNamespaceProperties`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 25 additive change(s).
      info	[Changelog]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-go-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 1ebd7cb. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generator automation-v2] [ERROR] total 1 error(s):
      cmderr	[generator automation-v2] [ERROR] package 'armservicebus' doesn't contain any exports
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-go/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go]: generator automation-v2
      warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 1ebd7cb. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.7.0 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/servicebus/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-servicebus [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
      cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
      cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
      cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/serviceBusManagementClient.js → ./dist/arm-servicebus.js...
      cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-servicebus.js in 580ms
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 1ebd7cb. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️servicebus [View full logs
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @msyyc
    Copy link
    Member Author

    msyyc commented Sep 22, 2021

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @RAY-316
    Copy link
    Contributor

    RAY-316 commented Sep 22, 2021

    /azp run

    1 similar comment
    @BigCat20196
    Copy link
    Contributor

    /azp run

    @Azure Azure deleted a comment from openapi-pipeline-app bot Sep 23, 2021
    @msyyc
    Copy link
    Member Author

    msyyc commented Sep 23, 2021

    /azp run

    Hardell pushed a commit to Hardell/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2021
    * Update readme.python.md
    
    * Update readme.python.md
    LeiWang3 pushed a commit to LeiWang3/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
    * Update readme.python.md
    
    * Update readme.python.md
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants