Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

databricks: fixing the Swagger Tags to be consistent #16437

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2021

Conversation

tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @tombuildsstuff Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 18, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for LintDiff.
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️~[Staging] ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 18, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⌛SDK Breaking Change Tracking pending [Detail]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from cfe9bfd. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
      Resource not accessible by integration
      HttpError: Resource not accessible by integration
          at /home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/@octokit+request@5.6.0/node_modules/@octokit/request/dist-node/index.js:86:21
          at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:95:5)
          at async workflowPkgUpdatePR (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflowPackage.js:346:21)
          at async Object.exports.workflowPkgMain (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflowPackage.js:41:5)
          at async workflowHandleReadmeMd (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflow.js:172:9)
          at async Object.exports.workflowMain (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflow.js:83:9)
          at async Object.exports.sdkAutoMain (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/entrypoint.js:152:13)
          at async /home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/cli/cli.js:20:18
    • ️✔️Az.Databricks [View full logs
      error	Fatal error: Resource not accessible by integration
      error	The following packages are still pending:
      error		Az.Databricks
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from cfe9bfd. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 8.1.2 -> 8.3.0
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v8.3.0>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@8.3.0` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-databricks [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsOperations
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from cfe9bfd. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️databricks/mgmt/2018-04-01/databricks [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New function `WorkspaceCustomParameters.MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `StorageAccountName` in struct `WorkspaceCustomParameters`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `VnetAddressPrefix` in struct `WorkspaceCustomParameters`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ResourceTags` in struct `WorkspaceCustomParameters`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `StorageAccountSkuName` in struct `WorkspaceCustomParameters`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `NatGatewayName` in struct `WorkspaceCustomParameters`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `PublicIPName` in struct `WorkspaceCustomParameters`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `LoadBalancerBackendPoolName` in struct `WorkspaceCustomParameters`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `LoadBalancerID` in struct `WorkspaceCustomParameters`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 2 additive change(s).
    • ️✔️preview/databricks/mgmt/2021-04-01-preview/databricks [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New function `OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClient.ListResponder(*http.Response) (ListOutboundEnvironmentEndpoint, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClient.ListPreparer(context.Context, string, string) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClient.List(context.Context, string, string) (ListOutboundEnvironmentEndpoint, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClient.ListSender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewOutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClient(string) OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewOutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClientWithBaseURI(string, string) OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `EndpointDependency`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `EndpointDetail`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `ListOutboundEnvironmentEndpoint`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `OutboundEnvironmentEndpoint`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `OutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpointsClient`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 16 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from cfe9bfd. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️armdatabricks [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from cfe9bfd. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]  WARN deprecated uuid@3.4.0: Please upgrade  to version 7 or higher.  Older versions may use Math.random() in certain circumstances, which is known to be problematic.  See https://v8.dev/blog/math-random for details.
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm WARN deprecated @opentelemetry/types@0.2.0: Package renamed to @opentelemetry/api, see https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]  created a lockfile as package-lock.json. You should commit this file.
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]  @octokit/plugin-request-log@1.0.4 requires a peer of @octokit/core@>=3 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️track2_@azure/arm-databricks [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
      error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from cfe9bfd. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️databricks [View full logs
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @ghost ghost added the customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. label Oct 18, 2021
    @ghost
    Copy link

    ghost commented Oct 18, 2021

    Thank you for your contribution tombuildsstuff! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

    @tombuildsstuff
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    ping @ruowan

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @msaranga msaranga left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Thanks for making changes, actually we are making these changes in our private repo.

    @tombuildsstuff
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @ruowan is there anything else needed to merge this one?

    @msyyc
    Copy link
    Member

    msyyc commented Jan 5, 2022

    /azp run

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization.
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants