-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Microsoft.StorageSync] Update 2020-03-01 and 2020-09-01 API versions to fix swagger correctness issues. #17159
Conversation
…ing defaults in put server endpoint properties, add missing property supportedAggregationTypes
Hi, @anpint Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L109 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L549 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L109 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L549 |
R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses |
The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.' Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L2235 |
R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses |
The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.' Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L2235 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L3475 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L3482 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L3966 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L4135 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L4256 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L4388 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L4394 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L4426 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L4432 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L3475 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L3482 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L3961 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L4130 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L4234 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L4355 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L4361 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L4393 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L4399 |
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema |
The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.StorageSync/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L22 |
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema |
The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.StorageSync/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-03-01/storagesync.json#L22 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'TriggerChangeDetectionParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L3316 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RecallActionParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L3344 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'StorageSyncServiceCreateParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L3357 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'StorageSyncServiceCreateParametersProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.StorageSync/stable/2020-09-01/storagesync.json#L3418 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
~[Staging] ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
NewApiVersionRequired reason: |
Hi @anpint, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@changlong-liu Please let me know if there's anything remaining to do with this PR or if it's ready to be merged. Looks like the only check that is failing is the breaking change check, and we've already received approval to make the changes. |
Hi @anpint , the approved breaking change is in swagger level, and still need to have SDK breaking review. Adding @ArcturusZhang , @qiaozha , @msyyc for SDK breaking change. Thanks. |
@changlong-liu What is "SDK breaking review"? I don't see it documented anywhere in the breaking change review process. |
Hi @anpint, it's about the breaking change on the released SDKs: https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/pull/17159/checks?check_run_id=4976024637 |
@changlong-liu I already followed the documented breaking change process which included filing an item and it included sections for the necessary SDK changes. I received approval from breaking change office hours to make the changes. This is the first time that I'm hearing of a separate SDK breaking change review process and it's not documented anywhere. |
Hi @anpint , there is SDK breaking approval requirement in the main diagram of below page: |
@changlong-liu thanks for sharing that. I didn't know it existed. The diagram is very helpful. I guess I will wait for the SDK breaking change review. |
Hi, @ArcturusZhang , @qiaozha , @msyyc, would you please review the SDK breaking change on Go/JS/Python. Thanks. |
… 2020-09-01 API versions to fix swagger correctness issues. (#2201) Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#17159 [ReCreate this PR](https://github.com/azure-resource-manager-schemas/compare/main...AzureSDKAutomation:sdkAuto/storagesync?expand=1)
…ing defaults in put server endpoint properties, add missing property supportedAggregationTypes (Azure#17159)
Changes to 2020-09-01:
Changes to 2020-03-01:
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.