Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add a large map sample to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/l… #17726

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 2, 2022
Merged

add a large map sample to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/l… #17726

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 2, 2022

Conversation

xuehongg
Copy link
Contributor

@xuehongg xuehongg commented Feb 9, 2022

…ogic/maps/create-or-update

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.

  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @xuehongg Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

    • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 9, 2022 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There are no breaking changes.

    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ❌ R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.'
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6294
    ❌ R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L7775
    ❌ R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L8061
    ❌ R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L8065
    ❌ R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Logic/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6370
    ❌ R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'Resource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6408
    ❌ R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'SubResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6440
    ❌ R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'OperationListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L12240
    ⚠️ R1006 - PutInOperationName 'PUT' operation 'IntegrationServiceEnvironmentManagedApis_Put' should use method name 'Create'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6186
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L8180
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L8611
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L8845
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L12836
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L12937
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L13025
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'WorkflowTriggers_Run' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L1096
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'WorkflowTriggerHistories_Resubmit' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L1543
    ⚠️ R2057 - InvalidSkuModel Sku Model definition 'Sku' is not valid. A Sku model must have 'name' property. It can also have 'tier', 'size', 'family', 'capacity' as optional properties.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L7311
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'IntegrationServiceEnvironmentNetworkHealthModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'IntegrationServiceEnvironmentNetworkHealth' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6028
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'versions' with immediate parent 'Workflow', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6590
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'triggers' with immediate parent 'Workflow', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6689
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'histories' with immediate parent 'WorkflowTrigger', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6860
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'runs' with immediate parent 'Workflow', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6981
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'operations' with immediate parent 'WorkflowRun', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L6981
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'actions' with immediate parent 'WorkflowRun', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L7106
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'schemas' with immediate parent 'IntegrationAccount', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L9448
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'maps' with immediate parent 'IntegrationAccount', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L9565
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'partners' with immediate parent 'IntegrationAccount', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L9726
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'agreements' with immediate parent 'IntegrationAccount', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L9866
    ⚠️ R3010 - TrackedResourceListByImmediateParent The child tracked resource, 'certificates' with immediate parent 'IntegrationAccount', must have a list by immediate parent operation.
    Location: Microsoft.Logic/stable/2019-05-01/logic.json#L12039
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️~[Staging] ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There is no credential detected.
    ️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 9, 2022 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ❌azure-sdk-for-go-track2 - armlogic - 0.4.0
    ❌azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-logic - 9.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - logic/mgmt/2019-05-01/logic - v62.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - logic/mgmt/2016-06-01/logic - v62.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/logic/mgmt/2018-07-01-preview/logic - v62.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/logic/mgmt/2015-08-01-preview/logic - v62.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/logic/mgmt/2015-02-01-preview/logic - v62.0.0
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net failed [Detail]   
  
    • ❌Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 0cbbd66. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-6.0
command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/logic/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
    • ❌Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic        [View full logs]         [Release SDK Changes]      
      cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/ScenarioTests/Workflows.ScenarioTests.cs(120,39): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/ScenarioTests/Workflows.ScenarioTests.cs(160,39): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/ScenarioTests/ScenarioTestsBase.cs(69,17): error CS1739: The best overload for 'IntegrationAccount' does not have a parameter named 'properties' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(484,54): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(485,54): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(486,54): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(487,57): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]      3>/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(507,24): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/ScenarioTests/Workflows.ScenarioTests.cs(120,39): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/ScenarioTests/Workflows.ScenarioTests.cs(160,39): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/ScenarioTests/ScenarioTestsBase.cs(69,17): error CS1739: The best overload for 'IntegrationAccount' does not have a parameter named 'properties' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(484,54): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(485,54): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(486,54): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(487,57): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
cmdout	[msbuild]          /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/InMemoryTests/Workflows.InMemoryTests.cs(507,24): error CS1929: 'IWorkflowsOperations' does not contain a definition for 'Update' and the best extension method overload 'IntegrationAccountsOperationsExtensions.Update(IIntegrationAccountsOperations, string, string, IntegrationAccount)' requires a receiver of type 'IIntegrationAccountsOperations' [/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/logic/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Logic.Tests.csproj]
error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-net]: dotnet
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]   
  
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0cbbd66. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 8.3.1 -> 8.5.2
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v8.5.2>
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@8.5.2` to update!
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-logic        [View full logs]         [Release SDK Changes]        Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Model IntegrationServiceEnvironment has a new parameter identity
info	[Changelog]   - Model Workflow has a new parameter identity
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] **Breaking changes**
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Operation IntegrationServiceEnvironmentManagedApisOperations.begin_put has a new signature
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]   
  
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0cbbd66. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:07 INFO [VERSION][Found] current version "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-logic;1.0.0-beta.1;1.0.0-beta.2"
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:07 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.2"
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:07 INFO autorest --version=3.6.6 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.50 --java --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/logic/azure-resourcemanager-logic --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.logic   --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --generate-samples --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL  ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/logic/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:52 INFO [CI][Skip] ci.yml already has module azure-resourcemanager-logic
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:52 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:52 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-logic
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:52 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:52 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:52 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module sdk/logic
cmderr	[generate.py] 2022-03-02 08:34:52 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-logic        [View full logs]         [Release SDK Changes]      
      cmderr	[Inst] 2022-03-02 08:36:43 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-logic
cmderr	[Inst] 2022-03-02 08:36:43 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
cmderr	[Inst] 2022-03-02 08:36:43 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-logic-1.0.0-beta.2-sources.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2022-03-02 08:36:43 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-logic-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2022-03-02 08:36:43 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-logic-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2022-03-02 08:36:43 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/17726/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-logic/azure-resourcemanager-logic-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-logic-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-logic -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-logic-1.0.0-beta.2.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
```"}
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]  
  
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0cbbd66. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh ./eng/initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️logic/mgmt/2019-05-01/logic        [View full logs]         [Release SDK Changes]      
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    • ️✔️logic/mgmt/2016-06-01/logic        [View full logs]       
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    • ️✔️preview/logic/mgmt/2018-07-01-preview/logic        [View full logs]       
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    • ️✔️preview/logic/mgmt/2015-08-01-preview/logic        [View full logs]       
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    • ️✔️preview/logic/mgmt/2015-02-01-preview/logic        [View full logs]       
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]  
  
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0cbbd66. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️armlogic        [View full logs]         [Release SDK Changes]        Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - Type of `IntegrationAccountSchemaProperties.Metadata` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowVersionProperties.Definition` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `Response.Headers` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `Operation.Properties` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunActionProperties.Error` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunActionProperties.TrackedProperties` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `SwaggerExternalDocumentation.Extensions` has been changed from `map[string]map[string]interface{}` to `map[string]interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `ExtendedErrorInfo.InnerError` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `OperationResult.Inputs` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `OperationResult.Outputs` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `OperationResult.TrackedProperties` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `IntegrationAccountAgreementProperties.Metadata` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `APIResourceProperties.ConnectionParameters` has been changed from `map[string]map[string]interface{}` to `map[string]interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunProperties.Error` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `ContentLink.Metadata` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowProperties.Definition` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `IntegrationAccountPartnerProperties.Metadata` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `IntegrationServiceEnvironmentManagedAPIProperties.ConnectionParameters` has been changed from `map[string]map[string]interface{}` to `map[string]interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `IntegrationAccountCertificateProperties.Metadata` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `TrackingEvent.Record` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `SwaggerXML.Extensions` has been changed from `map[string]map[string]interface{}` to `map[string]interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `SwaggerCustomDynamicSchema.Parameters` has been changed from `map[string]map[string]interface{}` to `map[string]interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `IntegrationAccountMapProperties.Metadata` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunActionRepetitionProperties.Inputs` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunActionRepetitionProperties.Outputs` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunActionRepetitionProperties.TrackedProperties` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowParameter.Value` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowParameter.Metadata` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunTrigger.Inputs` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunTrigger.Outputs` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunTrigger.Error` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowRunTrigger.TrackedProperties` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `IntegrationAccountSessionProperties.Content` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `Request.Headers` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `SwaggerSchema.Example` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `SwaggerSchema.AdditionalProperties` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowTriggerHistoryProperties.Error` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowOutputParameter.Error` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowOutputParameter.Metadata` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `WorkflowOutputParameter.Value` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `SwaggerCustomDynamicTreeParameter.Value` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `APIReference.Swagger` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `interface{}`
info	[Changelog] - Function `IntegrationAccountSessionFilter.MarshalJSON` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Function `*IntegrationAccountSessionFilter.UnmarshalJSON` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Function `ManagedAPIListResult.MarshalJSON` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `IntegrationAccountAgreementFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `IntegrationAccountMapFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `IntegrationAccountPartnerFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `IntegrationAccountSchemaFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `IntegrationAccountSessionFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `ManagedAPIListResult` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `WorkflowFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `WorkflowRunActionFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `WorkflowRunFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `WorkflowTriggerFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Struct `WorkflowTriggerHistoryFilter` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Field `Object` of struct `WorkflowsClientGenerateUpgradedDefinitionResult` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Field `Object` of struct `WorkflowsClientListSwaggerResult` has been removed
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - New field `Interface` in struct `WorkflowsClientGenerateUpgradedDefinitionResult`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Interface` in struct `WorkflowsClientListSwaggerResult`
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 57 breaking change(s), 2 additive change(s).
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]   
  
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0cbbd66. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm WARN deprecated read-package-tree@5.1.6: The functionality that this package provided is now in @npmcli/arborist
cmderr	[automation_init.sh]  uuid@3.4.0: Please upgrade  to version 7 or higher.  Older versions may use Math.random() in certain circumstances, which is known to be problematic.  See https://v8.dev/blog/math-random for details.
cmderr	[automation_init.sh]  @opentelemetry/types@0.2.0: Package renamed to @opentelemetry/api, see https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] notice created a lockfile as package-lock.json. You should commit this file.
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm WARN @octokit/plugin-request-log@1.0.4 requires a peer of @octokit/core@>=3 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-logic        [View full logs]         [Release SDK Changes]      
      info	[Changelog]
error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]   
  
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0cbbd66. Schema Automation 14.0.0 
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
warn	No file changes detected after generation
warn	Skip detect changed packages
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?
          		
    
    
      

    
    


        
    

            

            
    
              
            
    
        
    
      
    

      
    
            
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


        
    

    


    



    


      
    
  
            





    

      
    
  
      

    

  
    
  @openapi-workflow-bot


    


  
    

    
    
      
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      



      

  
    

  
    
    

  
    

    


      
    

        

    
  
    
    
      
          
    Hi @xuehongg, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.  
    TaskHow to fixPriority
     
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
     
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
     
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
     
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
      If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.
    
          		
    
    
      

    
    


        
    

            

            
    
              
            
    
        
    
      
    

      
    
            
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


        
    

    


    



    


      
    
  
            


  
    
  
    
    
  
    

  
    
      
    
    @openapi-sdkautomation
openapi-sdkautomation
bot


    mentioned this pull request
    
      Feb 9, 2022
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    




  
    

    

    


  
    
  
    
    
  
    

  
    
      
    
  This was referenced Feb 9, 2022

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    



      
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Draft

  
    

    



  
    

    

    





    

      
    
  
        



    

      
    
  
        



    

      
    
  
        



    

      
    
  
        



    

      
    
  
        



    

      
    
  
        



    

      
    
  
        



    

      
    
  
        
    
  
    
      
    
  ecfan
  
    
  
              
    
            
                  ecfan
  

            

            suggested changes


            
                
                  Feb 16, 2022
                
            
            
          
    

          
    


              
    View reviewed changes
  


          
    

    

    
          
    
  
  
  
                  
    
                        
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      

  
  Member


      

  
    

  
    
    
    
      @ecfan

      
            ecfan
  

      

      

      left a comment




      
    
    

  
    

    
                    

                        
    
  
    
  
 
    
  
    

    
    Choose a reason for hiding this comment
    

    
    
      The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
    
    

    
    
      
      

    

  

    

  
    
    
      
    Provided feedback, thanks!
    
    
    
      
  

    


                      
    
                    
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


    
                        
    
                      
                    
    


    

    

    
      
    
  
  
  
    

    

      
    

    



    

      
    
  
          
    
  
    
    
  
    

  
    
      
    
    @openapi-sdkautomation
openapi-sdkautomation
bot


    mentioned this pull request
    
      Feb 17, 2022
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    




  
    

    




    

      
    
  
        
    
  
    
      
    
  ecfan
  
    
  
              
    
            
                  ecfan
  

            

            suggested changes


            
                
                  Feb 24, 2022
                
            
            
          
    

          
    


              
    View reviewed changes
  


          
    

    

    
          
    
  
  
  
                  
    
                        
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      

  
  Member


      

  
    

  
    
    
    
      @ecfan

      
            ecfan
  

      

      

      left a comment




      
    
    

  
    

    
                    

                        
    
  
    
  
 
    
  
    

    
    Choose a reason for hiding this comment
    

    
    
      The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
    
    

    
    
      
      

    

  

    

  
    
    
      
    Updated feedback per clarification
    
    
    
      
  

    


                      
    
                    
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


    
                        
    
                      
                    
    


    

    

    
      
    
  
  
  
    

    

      
    

    



    

      
    
  
      

    

  
    
  @xuehongg


    


  
    

    
    
      
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      

  
    Contributor


      

  Author


  
    

  
    
    

  
    

    


      
    

        

    
  
    
    
      
          
    @ecfan Is there anything I need to do now on this PR?
    
          		
    
    
      

    
    


        
    

            

            
    
              
            
    
        
    
      
    

      
    
            
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


        
    

    


    



    


      
    
  
        



    

      
    
  
      

    

  
    
  @ArcturusZhang


    


  
    

    
    
      
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      

  
  Member


      

  
    

  
    
    

  
    

    


      
    

        

    
  
    
    
      
          
    

    @ecfan Is there anything I need to do now on this PR?
    

    

    Could you please follow the guidance here to fix the PrettierCheck failure?
    
          		
    
    
      

    
    


        
    

            

            
    
              
            
    
        
    
      
    

      
    
            
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


        
    

    


    



    


      
    
  
      

    

  
    
  @ecfan


    


  
    

    
    
      
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      

  
  Member


      

  
    

  
    
    
    
      

      
            ecfan
  

      

      

      commented


        Mar 1, 2022


      
    
    

  
    

    


      
    

        

    
  
    
    
      
          
    @xuehongg, I think this comment was for you?
    

    

    Could you please follow the guidance here to fix the PrettierCheck failure?
    

    
          		
    
    
      

    
    


        
    

            

            
    
              
            
    
        
    
      
    

      
    
            
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


        
    

    


    



    


      
    
  
        



    



        
    
  
        



    

        
    
  
          
  
    
  
    
    
  
    

  
    
      
    
    @openapi-sdkautomation
openapi-sdkautomation
bot


    mentioned this pull request
    
      Mar 1, 2022
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    




  
    

    




    

        
    
  
      

    

  
    
  @xuehongg


    


  
    

    
    
      
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      

  
    Contributor


      

  Author


  
    

  
    
    
    
      

      
            xuehongg
  

      

      

      commented


        Mar 2, 2022


      
    
    

  
    

    


      
    

        

    
  
    
    
      
          
    @ecfan @ArcturusZhang
    

    I have run the PrettierCheck today. Can we publish this article now?  Thanks.
    
          		
    
    
      

    
    


        
    

            

            
    
              
            
    
        
    
      
    

      
    
            
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


        
    

    


    



    


        
    
  
      

    

  
    
  @ecfan


    


  
    

    
    
      
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      

  
  Member


      

  
    

  
    
    
    
      

      
            ecfan
  

      

      

      commented


        Mar 2, 2022


      
  •

  
    
    
      
    
        
          edited
          
        
        
      
    
        
    
      
        
      Loading

      
    
  
    
    

    
    

  
    

    


      
    

        

    
  
    
    
      
          
    @ArcturusZhang, do you know how to get this update published? Looks like something still isn't building correctly.
    
          		
    
    
      

    
    


        
    

            

            
    
              
            
    
        
    
      
    

      
    
            
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


        
    

    


    



    


        
    
  
          
    
  
    
    
  
    
  
    


        @ArcturusZhang
  ArcturusZhang



        merged commit 0cbbd66
      into

      
  
    Azure:main
  


    Mar 2, 2022

  
    

    


    

  
    
  
    
    
  
    

  
    
      
    
  This was referenced Mar 2, 2022

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    



      
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    



      
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    



      
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    



      
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    



      
    

    


    
  


  
    
      
   Closed

  
    

    



  
    

    




    

        
    
  
      

    

  
    
  @ecfan


    


  
    

    
    
      
    
  
    
    
    
        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  
    
              
    
    
  
    

  
    
      

  
  Member


      

  
    

  
    
    
    
      

      
            ecfan
  

      

      

      commented


        Mar 2, 2022


      
    
    

  
    

    


      
    

        

    
  
    
    
      
          
    @ArcturusZhang, do you know what's the publishing schedule for when this update is published?
    
          		
    
    
      

    
    


        
    

            

            
    
              
            
    
        
    
      
    

      
    
            
  
    
    
  
    
    

  
    
  
    


        
    

    


    



    


        
    
  
          

    
  
    
  
  
    
    
  FredericHeem 

      pushed a commit
        to grucloud/azure-rest-api-specs
      that referenced
      this pull request

    
      Mar 7, 2022
    
    
    
      

    
  
    
    
    
      

    
  
    
      
        @xuehongg
      
        @FredericHeem
  
    

    


      
    
        
          add a large map sample to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/l… (
        

          
            
          

      
    

      
    
          

    
    
    

  

      
    

      
    
      
    

      
      
    
        
          213f25a
        
      
    
    
    
  
    
    
    
      
    Azure#17726)

* add a large map sample to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/logic/maps/create-or-update

* add a large map sample to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/logic/maps/create-or-update

* add a large map sample to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/logic/maps/create-or-update

* commit after running prettier
    
    
    

    

    
    
  
    

    

  
  
  



    



  
  
    
    
    
      

      
    



    
    

    
    
      
    
              
    
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment


  

    

      
    
    
    
  
    


    
  
              

    


      
    
  
    
    
    
    
  
    
    Reviewers
  
    

    


        
    
          

  
      @ecfan
  
    ecfan



          
            
              
            
          
          ecfan requested changes

        
    
        
    
          

  
      @ArcturusZhang
  
    ArcturusZhang



          
            
              
            
          
          ArcturusZhang approved these changes

        
    

      
    


    


    
    
  
    

      
  
    
    Assignees
  
    


        

      
    
        

  
      @ArcturusZhang
  
    ArcturusZhang
    

      
    
    



    


      

    
  


  
    
    Labels
  
    


    
    
      

    CI-BreakingChange-Go-V2



    


    


      

  
    
    
    
        
    
    Projects
  
    

        
    

    

    None yet




      
    


      

    
  
    
    
  
    
    Milestone
  
    

      No milestone


    


    
      
          

    
  
    
    
      
    
        
    
    
    Development
  
    


          


    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
    


  


            
  
    

    

        
          

    

  
      
    
  
    
    
    
      3 participants
    
    
    
    
        
          @xuehongg 
        
          @ArcturusZhang 
        
          @ecfan