Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Microsoft.DataProtection new API Version 2022 05 01 #19083

Conversation

umpatel
Copy link
Contributor

@umpatel umpatel commented May 16, 2022

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @umpatel Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 16, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing 'DppProxyResource' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4959


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'AzureBackupFindRestorableTimeRangesRequestResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L3549
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'AzureBackupFindRestorableTimeRangesResponseResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L3580
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'AzureBackupRecoveryPointResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L3841
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'BackupInstanceResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4172
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'BackupVaultResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4331
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'BaseBackupPolicyResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4391
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'CloudError' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4591
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'Error' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L5090
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorAdditionalInfo' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L5128
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'additionalDetails' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L5350
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'additionalDetails' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L5398
    R4039 - ParametersOrder The parameters:operationId,location should be kept in the same order as they present in the path.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L64
    ⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'BackupInstances' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1375
    ⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'BackupInstances' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1993
    ⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'ResourceGuards' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2774
    ⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'ResourceGuards' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L3089
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'BackupVaults_GetInSubscription' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L27
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'BackupVaults_GetInResourceGroup' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L289
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'ResourceGuards_GetResourcesInSubscription' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2424
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'ResourceGuards_GetResourcesInResourceGroup' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2466
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'ResourceGuards_GetDisableSoftDeleteRequestsObjects' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2722
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'ResourceGuards_GetDeleteResourceGuardProxyRequestsObjects' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2774
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'ResourceGuards_GetBackupSecurityPINRequestsObjects' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2826
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'ResourceGuards_GetDeleteProtectedItemRequestsObjects' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2878
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'ResourceGuards_GetUpdateProtectionPolicyRequestsObjects' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2930
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'ResourceGuards_GetUpdateProtectedItemRequestsObjects' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2982
    ⚠️ R1006 - PutInOperationName 'PUT' operation 'ResourceGuards_Put' should use method name 'Create'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2511
    ⚠️ R1007 - PatchInOperationName 'PATCH' operation 'ResourceGuards_Patch' should use method name 'Update'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L2664
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L3588
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L3761
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️⚠️Cross-Version Breaking Changes: 17 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4197:11
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-04-01/dataprotection.json#L4197:11
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1050:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-04-01/dataprotection.json#L1050:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1101:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-04-01/dataprotection.json#L1101:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1109:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-04-01/dataprotection.json#L1109:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1115:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-04-01/dataprotection.json#L1115:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1408:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-04-01/dataprotection.json#L1408:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4172:5
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-04-01/dataprotection.json#L4172:5


    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with latest preview version:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ 1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/{resourceId}/providers/Microsoft.DataProtection/backupInstances' removed or restructured?
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L1016:5
    ⚠️ 1007 - RemovedClientParameter The new version is missing a client parameter that was found in the old version. Was 'ResourceId' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L6475:3
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L6502:3
    ⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L6412:9
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L6438:9
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4197:11
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L4255:11
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1050:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L1092:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1101:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L1143:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1109:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L1151:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1115:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L1157:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L1408:13
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L1450:13
    ⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2022-05-01/dataprotection.json#L4172:5
    Old: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2022-03-31-preview/dataprotection.json#L4230:5
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 16, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go-track2 - armdataprotection - 1.1.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-dataprotection - 1.0.0b1
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - dataprotection/mgmt/2022-03-01/dataprotection - v64.1.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - dataprotection/mgmt/2021-07-01/dataprotection - v64.1.0
    azure-sdk-for-go - dataprotection/mgmt/2021-01-01/dataprotection - v64.1.0
    +	Function `*BackupInstancesValidateRestoreFuture.UnmarshalJSON` has been removed
    +	Function `*BackupVaultsPatchFuture.UnmarshalJSON` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupInstancesClient.ValidateRestorePreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupInstancesClient.ValidateRestoreResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupInstancesClient.ValidateRestoreSender` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupInstancesClient.ValidateRestore` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInResourceGroupComplete` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInResourceGroupPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInResourceGroupResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInResourceGroupSender` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInResourceGroup` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInSubscriptionComplete` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInSubscriptionPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInSubscriptionResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInSubscriptionSender` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.GetResourcesInSubscription` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.PatchPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.PatchResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.PatchSender` has been removed
    +	Function `BackupVaultsClient.Patch` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.CheckFeatureSupportPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.CheckFeatureSupportResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.CheckFeatureSupportSender` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.CheckFeatureSupport` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.GetOperationResultPatchPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.GetOperationResultPatchResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.GetOperationResultPatchSender` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.GetOperationResultPatch` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.GetOperationStatusPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.GetOperationStatusResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.GetOperationStatusSender` has been removed
    +	Function `BaseClient.GetOperationStatus` has been removed
    +	Function `FindRestorableTimeRangesClient.PostPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `FindRestorableTimeRangesClient.PostResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `FindRestorableTimeRangesClient.PostSender` has been removed
    +	Function `FindRestorableTimeRangesClient.Post` has been removed
    +	Function `JobClient.GetPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `JobClient.GetResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `JobClient.GetSender` has been removed
    +	Function `JobClient.Get` has been removed
    +	Function `NewFindRestorableTimeRangesClientWithBaseURI` has been removed
    +	Function `NewFindRestorableTimeRangesClient` has been removed
    +	Function `NewJobClientWithBaseURI` has been removed
    +	Function `NewJobClient` has been removed
    +	Function `NewRecoveryPointClientWithBaseURI` has been removed
    +	Function `NewRecoveryPointClient` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointClient.GetPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointClient.GetResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointClient.GetSender` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointClient.Get` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointsClient.GetListComplete` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointsClient.GetListPreparer` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointsClient.GetListResponder` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointsClient.GetListSender` has been removed
    +	Function `RecoveryPointsClient.GetList` has been removed
    +	Struct `BackupInstancesValidateRestoreFuture` has been removed
    +	Struct `BackupVaultsPatchFuture` has been removed
    +	Struct `FindRestorableTimeRangesClient` has been removed
    +	Struct `JobClient` has been removed
    +	Struct `RecoveryPointClient` has been removed
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/dataprotection/mgmt/2021-06-01-preview/dataprotection - v64.1.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/dataprotection/mgmt/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection - v64.1.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - armdataprotection - 1.1.0
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from c0d5296. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-6.0
      command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] No usable version of the libssl was found
      cmderr	[Autorest] FATAL: csharp/simplifier - FAILED
      cmderr	[Autorest] FATAL: Error: [Exception] AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp' terminated.
      cmderr	[Autorest] Process() cancelled due to exception : [Exception] AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp' terminated.
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-net]: autorest
      warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from c0d5296. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] config global `--global`, `--local` are deprecated. Use `--location=global` instead.
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-dataprotection [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation BackupInstancesOperations.begin_resume_backups
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation BackupInstancesOperations.begin_resume_protection
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation BackupInstancesOperations.begin_stop_protection
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation BackupInstancesOperations.begin_suspend_backups
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation BackupInstancesOperations.begin_sync_backup_instance
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation BackupInstancesOperations.get_backup_instance_operation_result
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group OperationStatusBackupVaultContextOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group OperationStatusResourceGroupContextOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AzureBackupRecoveryPointBasedRestoreRequest has a new parameter source_resource_id
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AzureBackupRecoveryTimeBasedRestoreRequest has a new parameter source_resource_id
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AzureBackupRestoreRequest has a new parameter source_resource_id
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AzureBackupRestoreWithRehydrationRequest has a new parameter source_resource_id
      info	[Changelog]   - Model BackupInstance has a new parameter validation_type
      info	[Changelog]   - Model BackupInstanceResource has a new parameter tags
      info	[Changelog]   - Model BackupVault has a new parameter monitoring_settings
      info	[Changelog]   - Model PatchResourceRequestInput has a new parameter properties
      info	[Changelog]   - Model SecretStoreResource has a new parameter value
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from c0d5296. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
      cmderr	[generate.py] SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
      cmderr	[generate.py] SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further details.
      cmderr	[generate.py] SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
      cmderr	[generate.py] SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
      cmderr	[generate.py] SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further details.
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from c0d5296. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️armdataprotection [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from c0d5296. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] deprecated read-package-tree@5.1.6: The functionality that this package provided is now in @npmcli/arborist
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]  uuid@3.4.0: Please upgrade  to version 7 or higher.  Older versions may use Math.random() in certain circumstances, which is known to be problematic.  See https://v8.dev/blog/math-random for details.
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]  deprecated @opentelemetry/types@0.2.0: Package renamed to @opentelemetry/api, see https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARN deprecated @azure/storage-blob@10.5.0: This version has been deprecated, please upgrade to the version tagged as latest
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm WARN @octokit/plugin-request-log@1.0.4 requires a peer of @octokit/core@>=3 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-dataprotectionplatform [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
      error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from c0d5296. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • Az.dataprotection [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @umpatel your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com).

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels May 16, 2022
    @umpatel
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    umpatel commented May 19, 2022

    Hi @xiaoxuqi-ms Please review the swagger changes

    @NetRock NetRock added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label May 27, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label May 27, 2022
    @xiaoxuqi-ms
    Copy link
    Member

    @ArcturusZhang could you help to review this pr for go SDK breaking change?

    @ArcturusZhang
    Copy link
    Member

    @ArcturusZhang could you help to review this pr for go SDK breaking change?

    This PR does not contain go track 2 breaking changes, therefore this does not need my review

    @xiaoxuqi-ms
    Copy link
    Member

    @umpatel please register ARM manifest and once the ApiReadness is ready, please let me know.

    @umpatel
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    umpatel commented Jun 15, 2022

    @umpatel please register ARM manifest and once the ApiReadness is ready, please let me know.

    @xiaoxuqi-ms I have started the ARM manifest update on the 13/6 and it will complete by 17/06

    @xiaoxuqi-ms
    Copy link
    Member

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-BreakingChange-Go-V2
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants