Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.CostManagement to add version stable/2022-05-01 #19143

Conversation

absyed
Copy link
Contributor

@absyed absyed commented May 19, 2022

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @absyed Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 19, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.6)] new version base version
    common-types.json 2022-05-01(9c3ff8c) 2021-10-01(main)
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 2 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) new version base version
    package-2022-05 package-2022-05(9c3ff8c) default(main)

    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R2066 - PostOperationIdContainsUrlVerb OperationId should contain the verb: 'generatecostdetailsreport' in:'GenerateCostDetailsReport_CreateOperation'. Consider updating the operationId
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2022-05-01/costmanagement.generatecostdetailsreport.json#L41
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: compressData
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2022-05-01/costmanagement.generatecostdetailsreport.json#L341
    ️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ MULTIPLE_API_VERSION The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers.
    readme: specification/cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md
    tag: specification/cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2022-05
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️⚠️SDK Track2 Validation: 5 Warnings warning [Detail]
    • The following tags are being changed in this PR
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/9c3ff8c573bcf12edcc18854a7aaff6246ad802f/specification/cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2022-05">cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2022-05
    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ UnkownSecurityScheme "readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-05",
    "details":"Security scheme azure_auth is unknown and will not be processed. Only supported types are AADToken,
    AzureKey,
    Anonymous"
    ⚠️ Modeler/MissingType "readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-05",
    "details":"The schema 'AlertProperties-details-resourceGroupFilterItem' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/cost-management/resource-manager/Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#/components/schemas/AlertProperties-details-resourceGroupFilterItem"
    ⚠️ Modeler/MissingType "readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-05",
    "details":"The schema 'AlertProperties-details-resourceFilterItem' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/cost-management/resource-manager/Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#/components/schemas/AlertProperties-details-resourceFilterItem"
    ⚠️ Modeler/MissingType "readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-05",
    "details":"The schema 'AlertProperties-details-meterFilterItem' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/cost-management/resource-manager/Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#/components/schemas/AlertProperties-details-meterFilterItem"
    ⚠️ Modeler/MissingType "readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-05",
    "details":"The schema 'QueryProperties-rows-itemsItem' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/cost-management/resource-manager/Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#/components/schemas/QueryProperties-rows-itemsItem"
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 19, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go-track2 - armcostmanagement - 1.1.0
    azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-costmanagement - Approved - 3.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2021-01-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2020-06-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-11-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-10-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-01-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2018-05-31/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/costmanagement/mgmt/2019-03-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/costmanagement/mgmt/2018-08-01-preview/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - armcostmanagement - 1.1.0
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from fbb4e2c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-6.0
      command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] No usable version of the libssl was found
      cmderr	[Autorest] FATAL: csharp/simplifier - FAILED
      cmderr	[Autorest] FATAL: Error: [Exception] AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp' terminated.
      cmderr	[Autorest] Process() cancelled due to exception : [Exception] AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp' terminated.
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-net]: autorest
      warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from fbb4e2c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️armcostmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New const `CostDetailsMetricTypeAmortizedCostCostDetailsMetricType`
      info	[Changelog] - New const `CostDetailsMetricTypeActualCostCostDetailsMetricType`
      info	[Changelog] - New const `CostDetailsDataFormatCSVCostDetailsDataFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New const `CostDetailsStatusTypeFailedCostDetailsStatusType`
      info	[Changelog] - New const `CostDetailsStatusTypeCompletedCostDetailsStatusType`
      info	[Changelog] - New const `CostDetailsStatusTypeNoDataFoundCostDetailsStatusType`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*GenerateCostDetailsReportClient.BeginGetOperationResults(context.Context, string, string, *GenerateCostDetailsReportClientBeginGetOperationResultsOptions) (*runtime.Poller[GenerateCostDetailsReportClientGetOperationResultsResponse], error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleCostDetailsStatusTypeValues() []CostDetailsStatusType`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleCostDetailsDataFormatValues() []CostDetailsDataFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*GenerateCostDetailsReportClient.BeginCreateOperation(context.Context, string, GenerateCostDetailsReportRequestDefinition, *GenerateCostDetailsReportClientBeginCreateOperationOptions) (*runtime.Poller[GenerateCostDetailsReportClientCreateOperationResponse], error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleCostDetailsMetricTypeValues() []CostDetailsMetricType`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewGenerateCostDetailsReportClient(azcore.TokenCredential, *arm.ClientOptions) (*GenerateCostDetailsReportClient, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `BlobInfo`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `CostDetailsOperationResults`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `CostDetailsTimePeriod`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `GenerateCostDetailsReportClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `GenerateCostDetailsReportClientBeginCreateOperationOptions`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `GenerateCostDetailsReportClientBeginGetOperationResultsOptions`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `GenerateCostDetailsReportClientCreateOperationResponse`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `GenerateCostDetailsReportClientGetOperationResultsResponse`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `GenerateCostDetailsReportErrorResponse`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `GenerateCostDetailsReportRequestDefinition`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `ReportManifest`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `RequestContext`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 36 additive change(s).
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from fbb4e2c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]  config global `--global`, `--local` are deprecated. Use `--location=global` instead.
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-costmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group GenerateCostDetailsReportOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group GenerateDetailedCostReportOperationResultsOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group GenerateDetailedCostReportOperationStatusOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group GenerateDetailedCostReportOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Alert has a new parameter e_tag
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AlertPropertiesDetails has a new parameter company_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AlertPropertiesDetails has a new parameter department_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AlertPropertiesDetails has a new parameter enrollment_end_date
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AlertPropertiesDetails has a new parameter enrollment_number
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AlertPropertiesDetails has a new parameter enrollment_start_date
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AlertPropertiesDetails has a new parameter invoicing_threshold
      info	[Changelog]   - Model CommonExportProperties has a new parameter next_run_time_estimate
      info	[Changelog]   - Model CommonExportProperties has a new parameter partition_data
      info	[Changelog]   - Model CommonExportProperties has a new parameter run_history
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Dimension has a new parameter e_tag
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Dimension has a new parameter location
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Dimension has a new parameter sku
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Export has a new parameter next_run_time_estimate
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Export has a new parameter partition_data
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Export has a new parameter run_history
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportDeliveryDestination has a new parameter sas_token
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportDeliveryDestination has a new parameter storage_account
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportExecution has a new parameter e_tag
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportExecution has a new parameter error
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportProperties has a new parameter next_run_time_estimate
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportProperties has a new parameter partition_data
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportProperties has a new parameter run_history
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Operation has a new parameter id
      info	[Changelog]   - Model OperationDisplay has a new parameter description
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Resource has a new parameter e_tag
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Resource has a new parameter location
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Resource has a new parameter sku
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Alert no longer has parameter tags
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportExecution no longer has parameter tags
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter tag_key
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter tag_value
      info	[Changelog]   - Operation ExportsOperations.get has a new parameter expand
      info	[Changelog]   - Operation ExportsOperations.list has a new parameter expand
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation group SettingsOperations
    ️❌ azure-resource-manager-schemas failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from fbb4e2c. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • cost-management/resource-manager [View full logs
    ️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from fbb4e2c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Az.Cost [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @absyed, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels May 19, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @absyed your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com).

    @zizw123 zizw123 added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Jun 14, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Jun 14, 2022
    @xiaoxuqi-ms
    Copy link
    Member

    Copy link
    Member

    @xiaoxuqi-ms xiaoxuqi-ms left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    @xiaoxuqi-ms
    Copy link
    Member

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @xiaoxuqi-ms
    Copy link
    Member

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Pull request contains merge conflicts.

    @xiaoxuqi-ms
    Copy link
    Member

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Pull request contains merge conflicts.

    @xiaoxuqi-ms xiaoxuqi-ms merged commit fbb4e2c into Azure:main Jul 12, 2022
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go-track2 - armcostmanagement - 1.1.0
    azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-costmanagement - Approved - 3.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2021-01-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2020-06-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-11-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-10-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-01-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2018-05-31/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/costmanagement/mgmt/2019-03-01/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/costmanagement/mgmt/2018-08-01-preview/costmanagement - v65.0.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - armcostmanagement - 1.1.0
    ️⌛ azure-sdk-for-net pending [Detail]
    ️⌛ azure-sdk-for-go pending [Detail]
    ️⌛ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 pending [Detail]
    ️⌛ azure-resource-manager-schemas pending [Detail]
    ️🔄 azure-powershell inProgress [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Python ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    8 participants