Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make required field changes #20128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2022

Conversation

HarshAulakhh
Copy link
Contributor

@HarshAulakhh HarshAulakhh commented Aug 5, 2022

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @HarshAulakhh Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 5, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 12 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.6)] new version base version
    elasticsan.json 2021-11-20-preview(f71f471) 2021-11-20-preview(main)
    Rule Message
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'name' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1342:11
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1339:11
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'name' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1203:9
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1200:9
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'sku' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1177:9
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1174:9
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'properties' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1159:11
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1159:11
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'properties' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L247:13
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L247:13
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'properties' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L259:13
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L259:13
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'properties' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L265:13
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L265:13
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'properties' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L321:13
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L321:13
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'properties' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L421:13
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L421:13
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'properties' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1170:5
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1170:5
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'sku' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1194:5
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1191:5
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'name' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1495:5
    Old: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1492:5
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) new version base version
    package-2021-11-20-preview package-2021-11-20-preview(f71f471) package-2021-11-20-preview(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'Volumes' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L964
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction
    Location: Microsoft.ElasticSan/preview/2021-11-20-preview/elasticsan.json#L1114
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️⚠️SDK Track2 Validation: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    • The following tags are being changed in this PR
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/f71f471ade38b4eb27698d543a3d7d7c9480934b/specification/elasticsan/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2021-11-20-preview">elasticsan/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2021-11-20-preview
    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ UnkownSecurityScheme "readme":"elasticsan/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-11-20-preview",
    "details":"Security scheme azure_auth is unknown and will not be processed. Only supported types are AADToken,
    AzureKey,
    Anonymous"
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 5, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - armelasticsans - 0.1.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-elasticsan - first release
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 8006549. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.ElasticSan [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 8006549. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]  WARN config global `--global`, `--local` are deprecated. Use `--location=global` instead.
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-elasticsan [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]   - Initial Release
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 8006549. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️armelasticsans [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] This is a new package
      info	[Changelog]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 8006549. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-elasticsan [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
      error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 5, 2022

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Python track2_azure-mgmt-elasticsan Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Java azure-resourcemanager-elasticsan Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    JavaScript @azure/arm-elasticsan Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.ElasticSan Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @HarshAulakhh, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants