Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.AlertsManagement to add version stable/2019-03-01 #20680

Conversation

khaledaboasbe
Copy link
Contributor

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @khaledaboasbe Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 12, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️⚠️BreakingChange: 2 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.7)] new version base version
    AlertsManagement.json 2019-05-05-preview(227939f) 2019-05-05-preview(main)
    AlertsManagement.json 2019-03-01(227939f) 2019-03-01(main)
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one 'string'.
    New: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L236:9
    Old: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L236:9
    ⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one 'string'.
    New: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L230:9
    Old: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L230:9
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 5 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) new version base version
    package-2021-04-only package-2021-04-only(227939f) package-2021-04-only(main)
    package-2019-03 package-2019-03(227939f) package-2019-03(main)
    package-2021-08 package-2021-08(227939f) package-2021-08(main)
    package-preview-2021-08 package-preview-2021-08(227939f) package-preview-2021-08(main)
    package-2019-06-preview package-2019-06-preview(227939f) package-2019-06-preview(main)

    [must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

    Rule Message Related RPC [For API reviewers]
    ⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing 'comments' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L859
    ⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing 'comments' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L859
    ⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing 'comments' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L859
    ⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing 'comments' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L897
    ⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing 'comments' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L897


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    R2018 - XmsEnumValidation The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L707
    R2018 - XmsEnumValidation The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L707
    R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.'
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L42
    R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.'
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L42
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L636
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L636
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1242
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1242
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1246
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1246
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1271
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1271
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1350
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1350
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1464
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L1464
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L30
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L30
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L30
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L30
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/AlertsManagement.json#L30
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'operation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L702
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'operation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L702
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'operation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L702
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'operationsList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L737
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'operationsList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L737
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'operationsList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L737
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'errorResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L756
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'errorResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L756
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'errorResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/preview/2019-05-05-preview/AlertsManagement.json#L756
    ️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ MULTIPLE_API_VERSION The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers.
    readme: specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md
    tag: specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2021-08
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️❌~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 22 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

    Tag package-2021-08; Prod region: Deployed

    Test run on region: westcentralus; Operation coverage: total: 17, untested: 0, failed: 11, passed: 6

    Service API Readiness Test failed. Check pipeline artifact for detail report.

    Rule Message
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 400,
    errorCode: LocationNotAvailableForResourceType,
    errorMessage: The provided location 'westcentralus' is not available for resource type 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. List of available regions for the resource type is 'global'."
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 400"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: ResourceNotFound,
    errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/alertprocedyg9nc' under resource group 'apiTest-UCEfcj-20680' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix"
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 404"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: ResourceNotFound,
    errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/alertprocedyg9nc' under resource group 'apiTest-UCEfcj-20680' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix"
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 404"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 400,
    errorCode: ApiVersionNotRegistered,
    errorMessage: The ApiVersion '2019-05-05-preview' is not registered for ResourceType 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/alertsMetaData'. Valid Api Versions are: '2019-03-01-preview'."
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 400"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: Unable to find the input alert"
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 404"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: Unable to find the input alert"
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 404"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: Unable to find the input alert"
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 404"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 429,
    errorCode: 429,
    errorMessage: Too many requests."
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 429"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: Unable to find the input smart group"
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 404"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: Unable to find the input smart group"
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 404"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: Unable to find the input smart group"
    ASSERTION_ERROR "expected response code to be 2XX but found 404"
    ️❌~[Staging] TrafficValidation: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️❌SDK Track2 Validation: 8 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    • The following tags are being changed in this PR
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/227939f9c5c6ec8f0a71f154dba41bd927441323/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2021-08">alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2021-08
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/227939f9c5c6ec8f0a71f154dba41bd927441323/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-preview-2021-08">alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#package-preview-2021-08
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/227939f9c5c6ec8f0a71f154dba41bd927441323/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2021-04-only">alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2021-04-only
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/227939f9c5c6ec8f0a71f154dba41bd927441323/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2019-06-preview">alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2019-06-preview
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/227939f9c5c6ec8f0a71f154dba41bd927441323/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2019-03">alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2019-03
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/227939f9c5c6ec8f0a71f154dba41bd927441323/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-preview-2019-05">alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#package-preview-2019-05
    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
    Rule Message
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-08",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponse' (1 differences):\n - properties.error.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:3" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:186"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-08",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponseBody' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:7" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:190"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-08",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponse' (1 differences):\n - properties.error.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:3" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:186"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-08",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponseBody' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:7" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:190"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2019-06-preview",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponse' (1 differences):\n - properties.error.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:13" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:192"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2019-06-preview",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponseBody' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:17" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:196"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2019-05",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponse' (1 differences):\n - properties.error.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:13" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:192"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2019-05",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponseBody' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:17" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:196"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-08",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponse' (1 differences):\n - properties.error.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:3" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:101"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-08",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponseBody' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:7" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:105"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-08",
    "details":"Error: 4 errors occured -- cannot continue."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-08",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponse' (1 differences):\n - properties.error.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:3" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:101"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-08",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponseBody' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:7" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:105"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-08",
    "details":"Error: 4 errors occured -- cannot continue."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2019-06-preview",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponse' (1 differences):\n - properties.error.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:13" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:107"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2019-06-preview",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponseBody' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:17" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:111"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2019-06-preview",
    "details":"Error: 4 errors occured -- cannot continue."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2019-05",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponse' (1 differences):\n - properties.error.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:13" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:107"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2019-05",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'errorResponseBody' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:17" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:111"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2019-05",
    "details":"Error: 4 errors occured -- cannot continue."
    ⚠️ PreCheck/EmptyParentSchemaWarning "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-08",
    "details":"Schema 'MonitorServiceList' has an allOf list with an empty object schema as a parent,
    removing it."
    ⚠️ PreCheck/EmptyParentSchemaWarning "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-08",
    "details":"Schema 'MonitorServiceList' has an allOf list with an empty object schema as a parent,
    removing it."
    ⚠️ PreCheck/EmptyParentSchemaWarning "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-04-only",
    "details":"Schema 'MonitorServiceList' has an allOf list with an empty object schema as a parent,
    removing it."
    ⚠️ UnkownSecurityScheme "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-04-only",
    "details":"Security scheme azure_auth is unknown and will not be processed. Only supported types are AADToken,
    AzureKey,
    Anonymous"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/EmptyParentSchemaWarning "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2019-06-preview",
    "details":"Schema 'MonitorServiceList' has an allOf list with an empty object schema as a parent,
    removing it."
    ⚠️ PreCheck/EmptyParentSchemaWarning "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2019-03",
    "details":"Schema 'MonitorServiceList' has an allOf list with an empty object schema as a parent,
    removing it."
    ⚠️ UnkownSecurityScheme "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2019-03",
    "details":"Security scheme azure_auth is unknown and will not be processed. Only supported types are AADToken,
    AzureKey,
    Anonymous"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/EmptyParentSchemaWarning "readme":"alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2019-05",
    "details":"Schema 'MonitorServiceList' has an allOf list with an empty object schema as a parent,
    removing it."
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 12, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/alertsmanagement/armalertsmanagement - Approved - 0.8.0
    +	Type of `AlertsClientChangeStateOptions.Comment` has been changed from `*string` to `*Comments`

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 280a506. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-6.0
      command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] No usable version of the libssl was found
      cmderr	[Autorest] FATAL: csharp/simplifier - FAILED
      cmderr	[Autorest] FATAL: Error: [Exception] AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp' terminated.
      cmderr	[Autorest] Process() cancelled due to exception : [Exception] AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp' terminated.
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-net]: autorest
      warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 280a506. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added model Comments
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 280a506. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/alertsmanagement/armalertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - Type of `AlertsClientChangeStateOptions.Comment` has been changed from `*string` to `*Comments`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `Comments`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 1 breaking change(s), 2 additive change(s).
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 280a506. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️alertsmanagement [View full logs
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 280a506. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • Az.alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 12, 2022

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/alertsmanagement/armalertsmanagement Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Python track2_azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

    @ghost ghost added the Alerts Management label Sep 12, 2022
    @khaledaboasbe khaledaboasbe marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2022 13:57
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @khaledaboasbe, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @khaledaboasbe, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    Khaled Abo Asbe added 2 commits September 20, 2022 11:41
    Copy link
    Member

    @mikekistler mikekistler left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Need to revert the unnecessary changes.

    @@ -3696,4 +3696,4 @@
    "dev": true
    }
    }
    }
    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Please revert this change.

    @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
    "$ref": "#/parameters/newState"
    },
    {
    "$ref": "#/parameters/comment"
    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    This change is not necessary -- please revert.

    Comment on lines 507 to 509
    "comment": {
    "comments": {
    "description": "reason of change alert state",
    "name": "comment",
    "name": "comments",
    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    These changes are not needed -- please revert.

    @changlong-liu
    Copy link
    Member

    Hi @khaledaboasbe , would you please fix R2024 Lint issues following https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/pull/20680/checks?check_run_id=8459441206 .

    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label Sep 21, 2022
    @changlong-liu
    Copy link
    Member

    Hi @tadelesh , would you take a look whether the reported GoLang breaking change blocks this PR?

    @mikekistler
    Copy link
    Member

    @khaledaboasbe As discussed in the breaking changes office hours, I will sign off on this change with the understanding that this matches the actual behavior of the service. Please test to make sure this is correct before merging.

    @mikekistler mikekistler added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Sep 21, 2022
    @tadelesh tadelesh added the Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go label Sep 22, 2022
    @tadelesh
    Copy link
    Member

    Hi @tadelesh , would you take a look whether the reported GoLang breaking change blocks this PR?

    Approved.

    @changlong-liu
    Copy link
    Member

    Hi @khaledaboasbe , the PR looks good as swagger now.
    Ping me please if you want this merge and this change does be the service behaviour.

    @khaledaboasbe
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    merge request

    @khaledaboasbe
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @khaledaboasbe As discussed in the breaking changes office hours, I will sign off on this change with the understanding that this matches the actual behavior of the service. Please test to make sure this is correct before merging.

    approved

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Alerts Management Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-FixRequiredOnFailure ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants