add missing property to fix swagger issue in databox-v2022-02-01 #20779

ashoknailwal · 2022-09-20T04:38:56Z

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

What's the purpose of the update?
- new service onboarding
- new API version
- update existing version for new feature
- update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
- Other, please clarify
When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

Change to data plane APIs

Adding new properties

All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
- Adding a new service
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version
  -[x] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2022-09-20T04:38:59Z

Hi, @ashoknailwal Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

openapi-pipeline-app · 2022-09-20T04:39:00Z

Swagger Validation Report

️❌BreakingChange: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.7)]	new version	base version
databox.json	2022-02-01(768472b)	2022-02-01(main)

Rule	Message
`❌` 1045 - AddedOptionalProperty	The new version has a new optional property 'granularCopyLogDetails' that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2789:7 Old: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2789:7

️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0)	new version	base version
package-2022-02	package-2022-02(768472b)	package-2022-02(main)

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
`❌` R4039 - ParametersOrder	The parameters:jobName,resourceGroupName should be kept in the same order as they present in the path. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L113
`❌` R4039 - ParametersOrder	The parameters:jobName,resourceGroupName should be kept in the same order as they present in the path. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L167
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L1072
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L1148
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L1287
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L1371
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L1383
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L1434
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2123
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2157
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2798
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2849
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2919
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2943
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2968
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L2981
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3004
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3028
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3067
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3080
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3197
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3204
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3420
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3565
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3591
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3598
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L3641
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L4850
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L5670
`❌` R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation	Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.DataBox/stable/2022-02-01/databox.json#L5683

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️️✔️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ServiceAPIReadinessTest.

️️✔️~[Staging] TrafficValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ModelValidation.

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passed for PoliCheck.

️⚠️SDK Track2 Validation: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

The following tags are being changed in this PR

"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/768472b52ec477ce9434fe5ff0f6b9e7bd9ce1c5/specification/databox/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2022-02">databox/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2022-02

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Rule	Message
⚠️ UnkownSecurityScheme	"readme":"databox/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2022-02", "details":"Security scheme azure_auth is unknown and will not be processed. Only supported types are AADToken, AzureKey, Anonymous"

️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for CadlValidation.

️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Summary.

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2022-09-20T04:39:01Z

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.

️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

Breaking Changes Tracking

❌azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-databox - Approved - 1.0.0

+	Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes
+	Model DataBoxHeavyJobDetails no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes
+	Model DataBoxJobDetails no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes
+	Model DiskScheduleAvailabilityRequest has a new required parameter expected_data_size_in_tera_bytes
+	Model DiskScheduleAvailabilityRequest no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes
+	Model JobDetails no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes

️❌ azure-sdk-for-net failed [Detail]

❌Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 065b070. SDK Automation 14.0.0

warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-6.0
command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/databox/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] No usable version of the libssl was found
cmderr	[Autorest] FATAL: csharp/simplifier - FAILED
cmderr	[Autorest] FATAL: Error: [Exception] AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp' terminated.
cmderr	[Autorest] Process() cancelled due to exception : [Exception] AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp' terminated.
error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-net]: autorest
warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 065b070. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-databox [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected

info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Added operation JobsOperations.mark_devices_shipped
info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group DataBoxManagementClientOperationsMixin
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails has a new parameter actions
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails has a new parameter data_center_code
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails has a new parameter datacenter_address
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails has a new parameter device_erasure_details
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails has a new parameter expected_data_size_in_tera_bytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails has a new parameter granular_copy_log_details
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails has a new parameter granular_copy_progress
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails has a new parameter last_mitigation_action_on_job
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxHeavyJobDetails has a new parameter actions
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxHeavyJobDetails has a new parameter data_center_code
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxHeavyJobDetails has a new parameter datacenter_address
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxHeavyJobDetails has a new parameter device_erasure_details
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxHeavyJobDetails has a new parameter expected_data_size_in_tera_bytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxHeavyJobDetails has a new parameter last_mitigation_action_on_job
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxJobDetails has a new parameter actions
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxJobDetails has a new parameter data_center_code
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxJobDetails has a new parameter datacenter_address
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxJobDetails has a new parameter device_erasure_details
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxJobDetails has a new parameter expected_data_size_in_tera_bytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxJobDetails has a new parameter last_mitigation_action_on_job
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataImportDetails has a new parameter log_collection_level
info	[Changelog]   - Model JobDetails has a new parameter actions
info	[Changelog]   - Model JobDetails has a new parameter data_center_code
info	[Changelog]   - Model JobDetails has a new parameter datacenter_address
info	[Changelog]   - Model JobDetails has a new parameter device_erasure_details
info	[Changelog]   - Model JobDetails has a new parameter expected_data_size_in_tera_bytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model JobDetails has a new parameter last_mitigation_action_on_job
info	[Changelog]   - Model JobResource has a new parameter system_data
info	[Changelog]   - Model Preferences has a new parameter storage_account_access_tier_preferences
info	[Changelog]   - Model RegionConfigurationRequest has a new parameter datacenter_address_request
info	[Changelog]   - Model RegionConfigurationResponse has a new parameter datacenter_address_response
info	[Changelog]   - Model UpdateJobDetails has a new parameter return_to_customer_package_details
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxDiskJobDetails no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxHeavyJobDetails no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model DataBoxJobDetails no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model DiskScheduleAvailabilityRequest has a new required parameter expected_data_size_in_tera_bytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model DiskScheduleAvailabilityRequest no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes
info	[Changelog]   - Model JobDetails no longer has parameter expected_data_size_in_terabytes

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 065b070. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️@azure/arm-databox [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

azure-arm-databox-5.0.0.tgz

info	[Changelog]
error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 065b070. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/databox/armdatabox [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - New field `GranularCopyLogDetails` in struct `DiskJobDetails`
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 1 additive change(s).

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 065b070. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️azure-resourcemanager-databox [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 065b070. Schema Automation 14.0.0

command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
warn	No file changes detected after generation

️✔️databox [View full logs]

️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 065b070. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️Az.DataBox [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- Az.DataBox.0.1.0.nupkg

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2022-09-20T04:39:02Z

Generated ApiView

Language	Package Name	ApiView Link
Go	sdk/resourcemanager/databox/armdatabox	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
Python	track2_azure-mgmt-databox	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
JavaScript	@azure/arm-databox	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
Java	azure-resourcemanager-databox	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2022-09-20T04:41:56Z

NewApiVersionRequired reason:

A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support.

EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

live1206 · 2022-09-28T01:44:37Z

@msyyc Could you help check the breaking change for Python? Thanks!

msyyc · 2022-09-28T02:49:11Z

the breaking of python is not caused by this PR. Approved.

add missing property to fix swagger issue in databox-v2022-02-01

768472b

openapi-assignment-bot bot assigned live1206 Sep 20, 2022

openapi-workflow-bot bot added the FixS360 label Sep 20, 2022

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the NewApiVersionRequired label Sep 20, 2022

AzureRestAPISpecReview added ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager labels Sep 20, 2022

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the CI-BreakingChange-Python-Track2 label Sep 20, 2022

msyyc added the Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Python label Sep 28, 2022

AzureRestAPISpecReview removed the NewApiVersionRequired label Sep 28, 2022

live1206 approved these changes Sep 29, 2022

View reviewed changes

live1206 added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Sep 29, 2022

live1206 merged commit 065b070 into Azure:main Sep 29, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

add missing property to fix swagger issue in databox-v2022-02-01 #20779

add missing property to fix swagger issue in databox-v2022-02-01 #20779

ashoknailwal commented Sep 20, 2022

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 20, 2022

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 20, 2022

live1206 commented Sep 28, 2022

msyyc commented Sep 28, 2022 •

edited

Loading

add missing property to fix swagger issue in databox-v2022-02-01 #20779

add missing property to fix swagger issue in databox-v2022-02-01 #20779

Conversation

ashoknailwal commented Sep 20, 2022

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Changelog

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

ARM API Review Checklist

Breaking Change Review Checklist

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 20, 2022

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 • edited Loading

Swagger Validation Report

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 • edited Loading

Swagger Generation Artifacts

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 • edited Loading

Generated ApiView

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Sep 20, 2022

live1206 commented Sep 28, 2022

msyyc commented Sep 28, 2022 • edited Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

msyyc commented Sep 28, 2022 •

edited

Loading