Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DigitalTwins to add version stable/2023-01-31 #21643

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 17, 2023

Conversation

sjiherzig
Copy link
Member

@sjiherzig sjiherzig commented Nov 24, 2022

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @sjiherzig Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Nov 24, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    digitaltwins.json 2023-01-31(0f20935) 2022-10-31(main)
    digitaltwins.json 2023-01-31(0f20935) 2021-06-30-preview(main)
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    package-2023-01 package-2023-01(0f20935) default(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L84
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L194
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L208
    DeleteResponseBodyEmpty The delete response body must be empty.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L240
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L244
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L357
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L422
    DeleteResponseBodyEmpty The delete response body must be empty.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L457
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L461
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'privateEndpointConnectionName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L773
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L817
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L850
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L864
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must return 201.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L902
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation Only 201 is the supported response code for PUT async response.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L903
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L903
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1013
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1075
    DeleteResponseBodyEmpty The delete response body must be empty.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1105
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1109
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DigitalTwinsResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1260
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DigitalTwinsIdentity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1311
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1389
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorDefinition' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1398
    XmsIdentifierValidation Missing identifier id in array item property
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1411
    XmsIdentifierValidation Missing identifier id in array item property
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1449
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DigitalTwinsEndpointResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1661
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DigitalTwinsEndpointResourceProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L1678
    ProvisioningStateValidation ProvisioningState must have terminal states: Succeeded, Failed and Canceled.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L2007
    XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'subscriptionId' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2023-01-31/digitaltwins.json#L2244
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️❌~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 7 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

    Tag package-2023-01; Prod region: Deployed

    Test run on region: westcentralus; Operation coverage: total: 22, untested: 0, failed: 7, passed: 15

    Service API Readiness Test failed. Check pipeline artifact for detail report.

    Rule Message
    CLIENT_ERROR statusCode: 409,
    errorCode: Conflict,
    errorMessage: Can't update instance SubscriptionId: db5eb68e-73e2-4fa8-b18a-46cd1be4cce5, ResourceGroup: apiTest-LKQMDW-21643, ResourceName : resourcednrz8t state from Activating to Updating
    Source: runtime
    OperationId: DigitalTwins_Update
    CLIENT_ERROR statusCode: 400,
    errorCode: BadRequest,
    errorMessage: Cannot perform action while Digital Twins instance is in 'Activating' state. Instance must be in state 'Active'.
    Source: runtime
    OperationId: TimeSeriesDatabaseConnections_CreateOrUpdate
    CLIENT_ERROR statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The time series database connection was not found.
    Source: runtime
    OperationId: TimeSeriesDatabaseConnections_Get
    CLIENT_ERROR statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The resource was not found.
    Source: runtime
    OperationId: PrivateEndpointConnections_CreateOrUpdate
    CLIENT_ERROR statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The resource was not found.
    Source: runtime
    OperationId: PrivateEndpointConnections_Get
    CLIENT_ERROR statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The resource was not found.
    Source: runtime
    OperationId: PrivateLinkResources_Get
    CLIENT_ERROR statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The resource was not found.
    Source: runtime
    OperationId: PrivateEndpointConnections_Delete
    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Nov 24, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking




    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 71e8a75. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]  notice
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.3 -> 9.5.0
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.5.0>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.5.0` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-digitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 71e8a75. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip available: 22.3.1 -> 23.0
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip available: 22.3.1 -> 23.0
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] [ForkJoinPool-1-worker-3] INFO com.azure.core.test.implementation.TestingHelpers - Environment variable 'AZURE_TEST_MODE' has not been set yet. Using 'Playback' mode.
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-digitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 71e8a75. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/digitaltwins/armdigitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New value `DigitalTwinsIdentityTypeSystemAssignedUserAssigned`, `DigitalTwinsIdentityTypeUserAssigned` added to type alias `DigitalTwinsIdentityType`
      info	[Changelog] - New type alias `CleanupConnectionArtifacts` with values `CleanupConnectionArtifactsFalse`, `CleanupConnectionArtifactsTrue`
      info	[Changelog] - New type alias `IdentityType` with values `IdentityTypeSystemAssigned`, `IdentityTypeUserAssigned`
      info	[Changelog] - New type alias `RecordPropertyAndItemRemovals` with values `RecordPropertyAndItemRemovalsFalse`, `RecordPropertyAndItemRemovalsTrue`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `ManagedIdentityReference`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `UserAssignedIdentity`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `AdxRelationshipLifecycleEventsTableName` in struct `AzureDataExplorerConnectionProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `AdxTwinLifecycleEventsTableName` in struct `AzureDataExplorerConnectionProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `AzureDataExplorerConnectionProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `RecordPropertyAndItemRemovals` in struct `AzureDataExplorerConnectionProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `EndpointResourceProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `EventGrid`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `EventHub`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `UserAssignedIdentities` in struct `Identity`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `ServiceBus`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `TimeSeriesDatabaseConnectionProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `CleanupConnectionArtifacts` in struct `TimeSeriesDatabaseConnectionsClientBeginDeleteOptions`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 23 additive change(s).
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-js failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 71e8a75. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] ERROR: The following environment variables were found with the "RUSH_" prefix,
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Error:
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] An error occurred while run build for readme file: "specification/digitaltwins/resource-manager/readme.md":
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Err: Error: Command failed: rush update
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Stderr: "null"
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Stdout: "null"
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] ErrorStack: "Error: Command failed: rush update
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at checkExecSyncError (node:child_process:861:11)
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at Object.execSync (node:child_process:932:15)
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/hostedtoolcache/node/16.19.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/dist/hlc/generateMgmt.js:85:33)
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at fulfilled (/opt/hostedtoolcache/node/16.19.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/node_modules/tslib/tslib.js:112:62)
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)"
    • @azure/arm-digitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
      error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 71e8a75. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️digitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 71e8a75. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Az.DigitalTwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Nov 24, 2022

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/digitaltwins/armdigitaltwins https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/960894d5764d4a3a8f0af2fcf0e9a912
    Java azure-resourcemanager-digitaltwins https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/60e6216cd8204ee4bdb8b0b25597b21e

    * Added lifecycle event tables and deletion option
    
    * Add examples, add deletion option
    
    * Add default value for recordPropertyAndItemRemovals
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Dec 19, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @sjiherzig your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com).

    @sjiherzig
    Copy link
    Member Author

    API will be made available by early next year.

    @raosuhas raosuhas added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Dec 20, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Dec 20, 2022
    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label Jan 6, 2023
    @zzvswxy
    Copy link
    Member

    zzvswxy commented Jan 9, 2023

    Hi @sjiherzig as the new api version is '2023-01-31', if it's OK to merge this PR at 2023-01-31? Do you have another plan?

    @sjiherzig
    Copy link
    Member Author

    @zzvswxy It's fine to merge - we still need to update the ARM manifest to make the version public, but I think the danger is low. You can go ahead and merge.

    @sjiherzig sjiherzig removed the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Feb 15, 2023
    @sjiherzig
    Copy link
    Member Author

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot added the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Feb 15, 2023
    @zzvswxy zzvswxy removed the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Feb 16, 2023
    @zzvswxy
    Copy link
    Member

    zzvswxy commented Feb 16, 2023

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot added DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval and removed DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval labels Feb 16, 2023
    @zzvswxy
    Copy link
    Member

    zzvswxy commented Feb 16, 2023

    Hi @tadelesh , can you help me to check the GO SDK breaking change? Thanks

    @tadelesh
    Copy link
    Member

    Hi @tadelesh , can you help me to check the GO SDK breaking change? Thanks

    There is no Go breaking change. It is a false auto-added label. I've removed it.

    @leni-msft
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @zzvswxy The API version is now available, but it looks like something has changed with the validation checks again, and a new check was introduced. It appears that a scenario is compiled from the examples, but it fails to properly poll on PUT (it sees the operationResults in the Location header returning 201, thinks that the async op is finished, and proceeds with the next step. Technically, this is not correct on our side, but the check should prefer the Azure-AsyncOperation header that we send).

    When both location & Azure-AsyncOperation headers are present, location is used first in API Test, as it's required header while the other is optional. The problem is when we poll with location header, if the operation is not completed, the location response should be 202, but the service returned 201.

    @zzvswxy
    Copy link
    Member

    zzvswxy commented Feb 16, 2023

    Hi @sjiherzig , do you think we can merge the PR? Or you want to merge it later when the ServiceAPIReadinessTest is passed.

    @sjiherzig
    Copy link
    Member Author

    @zzvswxy The API version is now available, but it looks like something has changed with the validation checks again, and a new check was introduced. It appears that a scenario is compiled from the examples, but it fails to properly poll on PUT (it sees the operationResults in the Location header returning 201, thinks that the async op is finished, and proceeds with the next step. Technically, this is not correct on our side, but the check should prefer the Azure-AsyncOperation header that we send).

    When both location & Azure-AsyncOperation headers are present, location is used first in API Test, as it's required header while the other is optional. The problem is when we poll with location header, if the operation is not completed, the location response should be 202, but the service returned 201.

    Interesting... my understanding of the ARM RPC is that Location is required only for PATCH, DELETE and POST, but not for PUT. For PUT, "Location" is only used if the service returns 202 on the initial request (and does not make the resource available immediately - i.e., a GET would still return 404). But if 200 or 201 is returned, it follows the "new" Azure-AsyncOp pattern. Is that not the correct interpretation @leni-msft ?

    We're sending the location header as a backup method, but maybe we should remove it entirely from PUT... it currently does not break CLI, SDK or Portal.

    @sjiherzig
    Copy link
    Member Author

    sjiherzig commented Feb 16, 2023

    Hi @sjiherzig , do you think we can merge the PR? Or you want to merge it later when the ServiceAPIReadinessTest is passed.

    Yes @zzvswxy, please merge it now, since we want to release the API version soon.

    @leni-msft
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @sjiherzig You're right, for PUT operation, location header is not required. We can optimize the logic (maybe by distinguishing PUT and non-PUT operations) cc. @jianyexi for awareness.
    Again, when sending location header, the response code should be 202 if operation is not completed. Also if no breaking changes, it sounds good to remove the location header from PUT response.

    @lirenhe lirenhe merged commit 71e8a75 into main Feb 17, 2023
    @lirenhe lirenhe deleted the dev-digitaltwins-Microsoft.DigitalTwins-2023-01-31 branch February 17, 2023 02:57
    aviyerMSFT pushed a commit to aviyerMSFT/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
    …ion stable/2023-01-31 (Azure#21643)
    
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.DigitalTwins from version stable/2022-10-31 to version 2023-01-31
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Added lifecycle event tables and deletion option (Azure#21644)
    
    * Added lifecycle event tables and deletion option
    
    * Add examples, add deletion option
    
    * Add default value for recordPropertyAndItemRemovals
    
    * Convert boolean into enum (Azure#22083)
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-BreakingChange-Go new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    7 participants