Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

June API version for ASR #23991

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

June API version for ASR #23991

merged 19 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023

Conversation

prsadhu-ms-idc
Copy link
Contributor

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[x] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @prsadhu-ms-idc Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels May 15, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 15, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    service.json 2023-06-01(d60e0ff) 2023-04-01(main)
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️🔄LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    ️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @prsadhu-ms-idc your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com).

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 15, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking




    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 7a929a6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] Breaking Changes: /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.ArmRecoveryServicesSiteRecoveryModelFactory.InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails(System.String, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.Nullable<System.Int32>, System.Nullable<System.Int64>, System.Nullable<System.Double>, System.Nullable<System.Double>, System.Net.IPAddress, System.String, System.Nullable<System.DateTimeOffset>, System.String, System.String, System.Nullable<System.DateTimeOffset>, System.Nullable<System.Guid>, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.InMageAzureV2ProtectedDiskDetails>, System.String, System.String, System.Nullable<System.Int32>, System.Nullable<System.Int32>, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.SiteRecoveryVmDiskDetails>, System.String, System.String, System.String, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.VmNicDetails>, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<System.String>, System.String, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.SiteRecoveryHealthError>, System.Nullable<System.DateTimeOffset>, System.Nullable<System.DateTimeOffset>, System.String, System.String, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.InMageAzureV2ManagedDiskDetails>, System.Nullable<System.DateTimeOffset>, System.String, System.String, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, System.Nullable<System.Int64>, System.String, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary<System.String, System.String>, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary<System.String, System.String>, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary<System.String, System.String>, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary<System.String, System.String>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.InMageAzureV2SwitchProviderBlockingErrorDetails>, Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.InMageAzureV2SwitchProviderDetails)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/recoveryservices-siterecovery/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery/src/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.VMwareCbtMigrationDetails Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.ArmRecoveryServicesSiteRecoveryModelFactory.VMwareCbtMigrationDetails(Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.String, System.String, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, System.String, System.String, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.VMwareCbtSecurityProfileProperties, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary<System.String, System.String>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.VMwareCbtProtectedDiskDetails>, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.VMwareCbtNicDetails>, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary<System.String, System.String>, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.Nullable<System.DateTimeOffset>, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.Nullable<System.Int32>, System.Nullable<System.Int32>, System.Nullable<System.Int32>, System.Nullable<System.Int32>, System.Nullable<System.Int64>, System.Nullable<System.Int64>, System.Nullable<System.Int64>, System.String, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.SiteRecoveryResyncState>, System.String, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary<System.String, System.String>, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary<System.String, System.String>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<System.String>)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/recoveryservices-siterecovery/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery/src/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.VMwareCbtProtectedDiskDetails Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.ArmRecoveryServicesSiteRecoveryModelFactory.VMwareCbtProtectedDiskDetails(System.String, System.String, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.Models.SiteRecoveryDiskAccountType>, System.String, System.String, System.Nullable<System.Int64>, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, System.Uri, System.String, System.Uri, System.String)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/recoveryservices-siterecovery/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery/src/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(96,5): error : ApiCompat failed for '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/bin/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery/Debug/netstandard2.0/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.dll' [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/recoveryservices-siterecovery/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery/src/Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 7a929a6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 9.6.7 -> 9.8.1
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.8.1>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.8.1` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-recoveryservicessiterecovery [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model A2AReplicationDetails has a new parameter churn_option_selected
      info	[Changelog]   - Model AzureFabricSpecificDetails has a new parameter location_details
      info	[Changelog]   - Model FabricQueryParameter has a new parameter extended_location_mappings
      info	[Changelog]   - Model FabricQueryParameter has a new parameter location_details
      info	[Changelog]   - Model HyperVReplicaAzurePlannedFailoverProviderInput has a new parameter os_upgrade_version
      info	[Changelog]   - Model HyperVReplicaAzureReplicationDetails has a new parameter all_available_os_upgrade_configurations
      info	[Changelog]   - Model HyperVReplicaAzureTestFailoverInput has a new parameter os_upgrade_version
      info	[Changelog]   - Model InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails has a new parameter all_available_os_upgrade_configurations
      info	[Changelog]   - Model InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails has a new parameter os_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails has a new parameter supported_os_versions
      info	[Changelog]   - Model InMageAzureV2TestFailoverInput has a new parameter os_upgrade_version
      info	[Changelog]   - Model InMageAzureV2UnplannedFailoverInput has a new parameter os_upgrade_version
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtEnableMigrationInput has a new parameter confidential_vm_key_vault_id
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtEnableMigrationInput has a new parameter target_vm_security_profile
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrateInput has a new parameter os_upgrade_version
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter appliance_monitoring_details
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter confidential_vm_key_vault_id
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter delta_sync_progress_percentage
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter delta_sync_retry_count
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter gateway_operation_details
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter is_check_sum_resync_cycle
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter operation_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter os_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter supported_os_versions
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new parameter target_vm_security_profile
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtProtectedDiskDetails has a new parameter gateway_operation_details
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtProtectionContainerMappingDetails has a new parameter excluded_skus
      info	[Changelog]   - Model VMwareCbtTestMigrateInput has a new parameter os_upgrade_version
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 7a929a6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/recoveryservices/armrecoveryservicessiterecovery [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New enum type `ChurnOptionSelected` with values `ChurnOptionSelectedHigh`, `ChurnOptionSelectedNormal`
      info	[Changelog] - New enum type `SecurityType` with values `SecurityTypeConfidentialVM`, `SecurityTypeNone`, `SecurityTypeTrustedLaunch`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `A2AFabricSpecificLocationDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `ApplianceMonitoringDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `ApplianceResourceDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `DataStoreUtilizationDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `GatewayOperationDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `OSUpgradeSupportedVersions`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `VMwareCbtSecurityProfileProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ChurnOptionSelected` in struct `A2AReplicationDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `LocationDetails` in struct `AzureFabricSpecificDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ExtendedLocationMappings`, `LocationDetails` in struct `FabricQueryParameter`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `OSUpgradeVersion` in struct `HyperVReplicaAzurePlannedFailoverProviderInput`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `AllAvailableOSUpgradeConfigurations` in struct `HyperVReplicaAzureReplicationDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `OSUpgradeVersion` in struct `HyperVReplicaAzureTestFailoverInput`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `AllAvailableOSUpgradeConfigurations`, `OSName`, `SupportedOSVersions` in struct `InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `OSUpgradeVersion` in struct `InMageAzureV2TestFailoverInput`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `OSUpgradeVersion` in struct `InMageAzureV2UnplannedFailoverInput`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ConfidentialVMKeyVaultID`, `TargetVMSecurityProfile` in struct `VMwareCbtEnableMigrationInput`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `OSUpgradeVersion` in struct `VMwareCbtMigrateInput`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ApplianceMonitoringDetails`, `ConfidentialVMKeyVaultID`, `DeltaSyncProgressPercentage`, `DeltaSyncRetryCount`, `GatewayOperationDetails`, `IsCheckSumResyncCycle`, `OSName`, `OperationName`, `SupportedOSVersions`, `TargetVMSecurityProfile` in struct `VMwareCbtMigrationDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `GatewayOperationDetails` in struct `VMwareCbtProtectedDiskDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ExcludedSKUs` in struct `VMwareCbtProtectionContainerMappingDetails`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `OSUpgradeVersion` in struct `VMwareCbtTestMigrateInput`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 36 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 7a929a6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-recoveryservices-siterecovery [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface A2AFabricSpecificLocationDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface ApplianceMonitoringDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface ApplianceResourceDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface DataStoreUtilizationDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface GatewayOperationDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface OSUpgradeSupportedVersions
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface VMwareCbtSecurityProfileProperties
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Type Alias ChurnOptionSelected
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Type Alias SecurityType
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface A2AReplicationDetails has a new optional parameter churnOptionSelected
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface AzureFabricSpecificDetails has a new optional parameter locationDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface FabricQueryParameter has a new optional parameter extendedLocationMappings
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface FabricQueryParameter has a new optional parameter locationDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface HyperVReplicaAzurePlannedFailoverProviderInput has a new optional parameter osUpgradeVersion
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface HyperVReplicaAzureReplicationDetails has a new optional parameter allAvailableOSUpgradeConfigurations
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface HyperVReplicaAzureTestFailoverInput has a new optional parameter osUpgradeVersion
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails has a new optional parameter allAvailableOSUpgradeConfigurations
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails has a new optional parameter osName
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface InMageAzureV2ReplicationDetails has a new optional parameter supportedOSVersions
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface InMageAzureV2TestFailoverInput has a new optional parameter osUpgradeVersion
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface InMageAzureV2UnplannedFailoverInput has a new optional parameter osUpgradeVersion
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtEnableMigrationInput has a new optional parameter confidentialVmKeyVaultId
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtEnableMigrationInput has a new optional parameter targetVmSecurityProfile
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrateInput has a new optional parameter osUpgradeVersion
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter applianceMonitoringDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter confidentialVmKeyVaultId
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter deltaSyncProgressPercentage
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter deltaSyncRetryCount
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter gatewayOperationDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter isCheckSumResyncCycle
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter operationName
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter osName
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter supportedOSVersions
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtMigrationDetails has a new optional parameter targetVmSecurityProfile
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtProtectedDiskDetails has a new optional parameter gatewayOperationDetails
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtProtectionContainerMappingDetails has a new optional parameter excludedSkus
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VMwareCbtTestMigrateInput has a new optional parameter osUpgradeVersion
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Enum KnownChurnOptionSelected
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Enum KnownSecurityType
    ️️✔️ azure-resource-manager-schemas succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 7a929a6. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️recoveryservicessiterecovery [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Pipeline Framework Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 7a929a6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
      SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
      Error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
    • ️✔️Az.recoveryservicessiterecovery.DefaultTag [View full logs
      error	Fatal error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
      error	The following packages are still pending:
      error		Az.recoveryservicessiterecovery.DefaultTag
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 15, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/recoveryservices/armrecoveryservicessiterecovery https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/98a8c01e7298481da73f5a8a801da280
    Java azure-resourcemanager-recoveryservicessiterecovery https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/e0f38c271439422ea5779a269fc9de78
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesSiteRecovery https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/8595d03bdfa84559a0ccec7805f4b616
    JavaScript @azure/arm-recoveryservices-siterecovery https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/4835af2f04354af7b7f95e1933f14241

    @rkmanda
    Copy link
    Member

    rkmanda commented May 17, 2023

        "targetBootDiagnosticStorageAccountSAS": {
    

    Is this truly a secret? or just the storage account name? If it is a secret, it doesnt make sense to include it in the response to a get, put, patch operations. You need a separate POST action to provide this information to customers.


    In reply to: 1550662607


    Refers to: specification/recoveryservicessiterecovery/resource-manager/Microsoft.RecoveryServices/stable/2023-06-01/service.json:18920 in a054788. [](commit_id = a054788, deletion_comment = False)

    @rkmanda
    Copy link
    Member

    rkmanda commented May 17, 2023

          "additionalProperties": {
    

    Usage of additionalProperties is not allowed. Can you define this as a concrete type instead? if not can you explain why this needs to be a loose dictionary?


    In reply to: 1550665670


    Refers to: specification/recoveryservicessiterecovery/resource-manager/Microsoft.RecoveryServices/stable/2023-06-01/service.json:12684 in a054788. [](commit_id = a054788, deletion_comment = False)

    @rkmanda rkmanda added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label May 17, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Please ensure to respond feedbacks from the ARM API reviewer. When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove ARMChangesRequested

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label May 17, 2023
    @prsadhu-ms-idc
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

          "additionalProperties": {
    

    Usage of additionalProperties is not allowed. Can you define this as a concrete type instead? if not can you explain why this needs to be a loose dictionary?

    Refers to: specification/recoveryservicessiterecovery/resource-manager/Microsoft.RecoveryServices/stable/2023-06-01/service.json:12684 in a054788. [](commit_id = a054788, deletion_comment = False)

    Resolved.

    @prsadhu-ms-idc
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

        "targetBootDiagnosticStorageAccountSAS": {
    

    Is this truly a secret? or just the storage account name? If it is a secret, it doesnt make sense to include it in the response to a get, put, patch operations. You need a separate POST action to provide this information to customers.

    Refers to: specification/recoveryservicessiterecovery/resource-manager/Microsoft.RecoveryServices/stable/2023-06-01/service.json:18920 in a054788. [](commit_id = a054788, deletion_comment = False)

    Removed.

    @prsadhu-ms-idc prsadhu-ms-idc removed the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label May 17, 2023
    @rkmanda rkmanda removed the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Aug 22, 2023
    @rkmanda rkmanda merged commit 7a929a6 into Azure:main Aug 22, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-MissingBaseCommit DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test Recovery Services Site-Recovery resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    9 participants