-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NetworkWatcher: Added new parameters to QueryConnectionMonitorResult and ConnectivityCheckRequest #2763
Conversation
…and ConnectivityCheckRequest
Automation for azure-libraries-for-javaThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-nodeA PR has been created for you based on this PR content. Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR: |
Hi @irrogozh @MikhailTryakhov we neel to Ack on CHanges for Networking that are against master, please follow up with him =Thanks, Samer |
"ProtocolConfiguration": { | ||
"description": "Configuration of the protocol.", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"hTTPConfiguration": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is hTTP case expected?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed
LGTM |
@@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@ | |||
"UDP" | |||
], | |||
"x-ms-enum": { | |||
"name": "Protocol", | |||
"name": "IpFlowProtocol", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
breaking change 1
@@ -2890,6 +2958,19 @@ | |||
}, | |||
"ConnectionMonitorQueryResult": { | |||
"properties": { | |||
"sourceStatus": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
breaking change 2 (constructor signature)
@MikhailTryakhov @salameer FYI, there are SDK breaking changes (see my comments) but indeed no API breakage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@olydis I meant no API breakage. I needed Anu because have no rights to approve :) now it can be merged |
@MikhailTryakhov well, all reviewers (like me) have the power to merge, so whoever is assigned to a PR will be the POC 🙂 |
This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.
PR information
api-version
in the path should match theapi-version
in the spec).Quality of Swagger