Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

network: add https probe which was missing in the spec #3230

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2018

Conversation

yugangw-msft
Copy link
Contributor

@yugangw-msft yugangw-msft commented Jun 13, 2018

//CC: @christiankuhtz

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 13, 2018

Automation for azure-libraries-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-libraries-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 13, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#2610

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 13, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#2376

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 13, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#1373

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 13, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#2040

@gmainar
Copy link
Contributor

gmainar commented Jun 13, 2018

Looks good. Thanks Yugang for doing this. @DeepakRajendranMsft , can you approve?

Copy link
Contributor

@MikhailTryakhov MikhailTryakhov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Copy link
Contributor

@sergey-shandar sergey-shandar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants