Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Compute] Modeling ASG association with VMSS (Service support this hence updati… #3371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2018
Merged

[Compute] Modeling ASG association with VMSS (Service support this hence updati… #3371

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2018

Conversation

anuchandy
Copy link
Member

@anuchandy anuchandy commented Jul 9, 2018

…ng swagger)

  • Compute supports associating ASG with VMSS. Today customer has to use ARM template for this. This PR update the compute spec 2018-06-01 with this (that way swagger represents the service).

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 9, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Encountered a Subprocess error: (azure-sdk-for-go)

Command: ['/usr/local/bin/autorest', '/tmp/tmpo3ft9oc0/rest/specification/compute/resource-manager/readme.md', '--go', '--go-sdk-folder=/tmp/tmpo3ft9oc0/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go', '--multiapi', '--use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.go@~2.1.105', '--use-onever', '--verbose']
Finished with return code 1
and output:

AutoRest code generation utility [version: 2.0.4280; node: v8.11.3]
(C) 2018 Microsoft Corporation.
https://aka.ms/autorest
   Loading AutoRest core      '/root/.autorest/@microsoft.azure_autorest-core@2.0.4280/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core/dist' (2.0.4280)
   Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.go' (~2.1.105->2.1.105)
   Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.modeler' (2.3.38->2.3.38)
Processing batch task - {"tag":"package-2018-04"} .
FATAL: System.InvalidOperationException: Swagger document contains two or more x-ms-enum extensions with the same name 'StorageAccountTypes' and different values: Standard_LRS,Premium_LRS vs. Standard_LRS,Premium_LRS,StandardSSD_LRS
   at AutoRest.Modeler.ObjectBuilder.BuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISH8kiit\38_20171116T010915\autorest.modeler\src\ObjectBuilder.cs:line 147
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SchemaBuilder.ParentBuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISH8kiit\38_20171116T010915\autorest.modeler\src\SchemaBuilder.cs:line 204
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SchemaBuilder.BuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISH8kiit\38_20171116T010915\autorest.modeler\src\SchemaBuilder.cs:line 46
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SchemaBuilder.BuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISH8kiit\38_20171116T010915\autorest.modeler\src\SchemaBuilder.cs:line 131
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SchemaBuilder.BuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISH8kiit\38_20171116T010915\autorest.modeler\src\SchemaBuilder.cs:line 131
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SwaggerModeler.BuildCompositeTypes() in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISH8kiit\38_20171116T010915\autorest.modeler\src\SwaggerModeler.cs:line 271
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SwaggerModeler.Build(ServiceDefinition serviceDefinition) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISH8kiit\38_20171116T010915\autorest.modeler\src\SwaggerModeler.cs:line 66
   at AutoRest.Modeler.Program.<ProcessInternal>d__2.MoveNext() in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISH8kiit\38_20171116T010915\autorest.modeler\src\Program.cs:line 60
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw()
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at NewPlugin.<Process>d__15.MoveNext()
FATAL: go/imodeler1 - FAILED
FATAL: Error: Plugin imodeler1 reported failure.
Process() cancelled due to exception : Plugin imodeler1 reported failure.
Failure during batch task - {"tag":"package-2018-04"} -- Error: Plugin imodeler1 reported failure..
  Error: Plugin imodeler1 reported failure.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 9, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#2487

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 9, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-node

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 9, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#1422

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 9, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

Copy link
Contributor

@dsgouda dsgouda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine apart from the comment

"items": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/SubResource"
},
"description": "Specifies an array of references to application security group."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is "application security group" definition the same as SubResource?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes they are same, it's a reference using id. This is consistent with other references (e.g. applicationGatewayBackendAddressPools, loadBalancerBackendAddressPools ) in the same model

Copy link
Contributor

@dsgouda dsgouda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants