Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swagger spec for disk.json + compute.json 2018-06 #3854

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Sep 12, 2018

Conversation

carissasun
Copy link
Contributor

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 10, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 10, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#2982

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 10, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#2685

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 10, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 10, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

Encountered a Subprocess error: (azure-sdk-for-node)

Command: ['/usr/local/bin/autorest', '/tmp/tmp7d7bwkcr/rest/specification/compute/resource-manager/readme.md', '--license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION', '--node-sdks-folder=/tmp/tmp7d7bwkcr/sdk', '--nodejs', '--use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.nodejs@2.1.99']
Finished with return code 1
and output:

AutoRest code generation utility [version: 2.0.4283; node: v8.11.3]
(C) 2018 Microsoft Corporation.
https://aka.ms/autorest
   Loading AutoRest core      '/root/.autorest/@microsoft.azure_autorest-core@2.0.4283/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core/dist' (2.0.4283)
   Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.nodejs' (2.1.99->2.1.99)
   Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.modeler' (2.3.44->2.3.44)
FATAL: System.InvalidOperationException: Swagger document contains two or more x-ms-enum extensions with the same name 'StorageAccountTypes' and different values: Standard_LRS,Premium_LRS,StandardSSD_LRS,UltraSSD_LRS vs. Standard_LRS,Premium_LRS,StandardSSD_LRS
   at AutoRest.Modeler.ObjectBuilder.BuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISHu1dw1\44_20171214T003644\autorest.modeler\src\ObjectBuilder.cs:line 147
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SchemaBuilder.ParentBuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISHu1dw1\44_20171214T003644\autorest.modeler\src\SchemaBuilder.cs:line 217
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SchemaBuilder.BuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISHu1dw1\44_20171214T003644\autorest.modeler\src\SchemaBuilder.cs:line 48
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SchemaBuilder.BuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISHu1dw1\44_20171214T003644\autorest.modeler\src\SchemaBuilder.cs:line 133
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SchemaBuilder.BuildServiceType(String serviceTypeName, Boolean required) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISHu1dw1\44_20171214T003644\autorest.modeler\src\SchemaBuilder.cs:line 133
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SwaggerModeler.BuildCompositeTypes() in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISHu1dw1\44_20171214T003644\autorest.modeler\src\SwaggerModeler.cs:line 310
   at AutoRest.Modeler.SwaggerModeler.Build(ServiceDefinition serviceDefinition) in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISHu1dw1\44_20171214T003644\autorest.modeler\src\SwaggerModeler.cs:line 66
   at AutoRest.Modeler.Program.<ProcessInternal>d__2.MoveNext() in C:\Users\ci\AppData\Local\Temp\PUBLISHu1dw1\44_20171214T003644\autorest.modeler\src\Program.cs:line 60
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw()
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at NewPlugin.<Process>d__15.MoveNext()
FATAL: nodejs/imodeler1 - FAILED
FATAL: Error: Plugin imodeler1 reported failure.
Process() cancelled due to exception : Plugin imodeler1 reported failure.
  Error: Plugin imodeler1 reported failure.

@lmazuel lmazuel added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 10, 2018
@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Sep 10, 2018
Copy link
Member

@lmazuel lmazuel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Double key in JSON that preventing generation and further testing.

@carissasun carissasun changed the title Swagger spec for disk.json 2018-06 Swagger spec for disk.json + compute.json 2018-06 Sep 11, 2018
"properties": {
"ultraSSDEnabled": {
"type": "boolean",
"description": "Enables or disables a capability to have 1 or more managed data disks with UltraSSD_LRS storage account on the VM or VMSS. Managed disks with storage account type UltraSSD_LRS can be added to a virtual machine or virtual machine scale set only if this property is enabled."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you please fix the indent?

@@ -5313,6 +5314,15 @@
},
"description": "Specifies the storage settings for the virtual machine disks."
},
"AdditionalCapabilities": {
"properties": {
"ultraSSDEnabled": {
Copy link
Member

@lmazuel lmazuel Sep 12, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This does not follow ARM guideline naming convention. Even if Gaurav signed-of, I checked with @veronicagg that you should get a suppression rule approved by ARM:
https://github.com/Azure/adx-documentation-pr/wiki/Swagger-Validation-Errors-Suppression

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lmazuel lmazuel merged commit 5fdf492 into Azure:master Sep 12, 2018
mccleanp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
* add "x-ms-secret": true for protectedSettings.

* remove protectedSettings from response models.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants