-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New resource: Add InGuest resource type software to Compute #4012
Conversation
Automation for azure-sdk-for-jsA PR has been created for you: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonA PR has been created for you: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-rubyA PR has been created for you based on this PR content. Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goA PR has been created for you: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-javaNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-nodeA PR has been created for you: |
specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/stable/2018-10-01/compute.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/stable/2018-10-01/compute.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/stable/2018-10-01/compute.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
- where: | ||
- $.definitions.InGuestSoftwareItem | ||
suppress: | ||
- TrackedResourcePatchOperation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to get ARM approval for this suppression, will request for ARM review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay
specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/stable/2018-10-01/compute.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@abhinav-gha - Larent @lmazuel noted that we are adding these apis to 2016-04-30-preview and 2018-10-01, but what about other api-versions in the middle 2017-12-01, 2018-06-01? It's weird to see that an operation exist in old API disappears in next couple of api-versions then come back in later one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few notes, Please take a look.
@@ -1892,6 +1892,104 @@ | |||
} | |||
} | |||
}, | |||
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/{vmName}/guestResourceTypes/software/items":{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lets make the values of guestResourceTypes as an enum and add the allowed values there.
}, | ||
"InGuestSoftwareItemProperties": { | ||
"properties": { | ||
"name": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
top level property names should not be repeated inside the properties bag. Lets rename this to softwareName
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/{vmName}/guestResourceTypes/software/items/{itemId}":{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What would GET on /subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/{vmName}/guestResourceTypes/software return? Do you want to support this API?
@abhinav-ghai can you address ARM comments and my question on not having this feature in some api-versions? |
Closing the PR to due to inactivity. |
This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.
PR information
api-version
in the path should match theapi-version
in the spec).Quality of Swagger