-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages to add version 2019-02-01-preview #5289
Conversation
Automation for azure-sdk-for-rubyNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-jsA PR has been created for you based on this PR content. Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-nodeA PR has been created for you: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-javaThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goA PR has been created for you based on this PR content. Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see comments
.../Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/examples/CreateImageTemplate.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
796ebc9
to
9ebd633
Compare
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@paulmey can we use the plural form for operation group, VirtualMachineImageTemplate_xx -> VirtualMachineImageTemplates_xx ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see the comment on using plural form for operation group.
operation_id: plural forms
This is done. Can we merge this so that we can start reviewing the next API version? |
@dsgouda should I wait for https://github.com/Azure/AzNetSdkTools/issues/133 to close before merging this? |
We'll start a review for our 2019-05-01-preview version immediately after this one gets merged... so if we can carry that issue over... 😉 |
@anuchandy We are not supporting new RPs for Automation for Net Sdk today, you can proceed with the review. |
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Please merge |
@AutorestCI regenerate azure-sdk-for-go |
If you are a MSFT employee you can view your work branch via this link.
Contribution checklist:
Changes with 2018-02-01-preview: