Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add terminate profile and scheduled events profile to Microsoft.Compute #6683

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 1, 2019

Conversation

szimmer-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@szimmer-dev szimmer-dev commented Jul 20, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 20, 2019

SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 84963d0, Iteration 12)

Failed Python: Azure/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
Failed Java: Azure/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
Failed JavaScript: Azure/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
Failed Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
Succeeded Ruby: Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#6461

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5409

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Copy link
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like there was a character encoding issue

…e/2019-03-01/compute.json

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
@hyonholee hyonholee added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 24, 2019
szimmer-dev and others added 2 commits July 24, 2019 15:21
…e/2019-03-01/compute.json

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…nstance

view expansion to get VM Scale Set VM.
Copy link
Contributor

@amarzavery amarzavery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please provide new examples or update existing examples with the new properties/models being added in this PR.

@szimmer-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

update

Example was added as requested.

@hyonholee
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@majastrz majastrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added some questions to the PR. Can you take a look?

@majastrz majastrz added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMReviewInProgress WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Aug 1, 2019
Copy link
Member

@majastrz majastrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Signed off from ARM side.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants