Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DataFactory] - Add CosmosDbSqlApi dataset #7242

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 24, 2019
Merged

Conversation

shawnxzq
Copy link
Member

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 18, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from 8188f2e, Iteration 4)

Succeeded .NET: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-net [Logs] [Diff]
Succeeded Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
Failed Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
  • Failed datafactory/resource-manager/v2017_09_01_preview [Logs] [Generation PR]
  • Failed datafactory/resource-manager/v2018_06_01 [Logs]
In-Progress Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
  • In-Progress datafactory/mgmt/2018-06-01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress preview/datafactory/mgmt/2017-09-01-preview [Logs]
Failed JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.

@shawnxzq shawnxzq changed the title [DataFactory] - Add CosmosDbSqlApi dataset [DataFactory] - Add CosmosDbSqlApi dataset [Don't merge] Sep 18, 2019
@azuresdkci azuresdkci requested a review from Juliehzl September 18, 2019 06:53
@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 18, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#7315

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 18, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5865

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

},
"encryptedCredential": {
"type": "object",
"description": "The encrypted credential used for authentication. Credentials are encrypted using the integration runtime credential manager. Type: string (or Expression with resultType string)."
}
},
"required": [
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you make connection not required here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We added dedicated properties to include information which must be in connectionString before. So its's not required any more and it is still backward compatible.

@Juliehzl Juliehzl added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 21, 2019
@Juliehzl
Copy link
Contributor

Remove [WaitForARMFeedback] label because "For Azure Data Factory team(ADF), Per their agreement with ARM team, no breaking change".

@Juliehzl
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Approved.

@Juliehzl Juliehzl removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 24, 2019
@Juliehzl Juliehzl merged commit 291251f into Azure:master Sep 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants