Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A bit of clean up in graph #1081

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2016
Merged

A bit of clean up in graph #1081

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2016

Conversation

jianghaolu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jianghaolu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Creation doesnt work yet. Just a bit of clean up before the C# conversion.

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Runtime changes detected. pull request created. CI running: Build Status

Copy link
Contributor

@anudeepsharma anudeepsharma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved with a minor change.

@@ -31,11 +31,14 @@ public void canCRUDUser() throws Exception {
//LIST
List<User> userList = graphRbacManager.users().list();
Assert.assertNotNull(userList);
User user = graphRbacManager.users().define("jeffrolfnlu@hotmail.com")
User user = graphRbacManager.users().define("azuresdk@outlook.com")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we delete this user after test is done? not sure if we can do so. But this test is not doing much once it run for first time as this user will always be there for ever.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test is not functional. For now it's just a placeholder.

}

@Override
public Observable<ServicePrincipal> createResourceAsync() {
return null;
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Will be implemented in a next release");

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

instead of promising when it will be implemented, which we probably shouldn't do, we could just say "Not yet implemented".

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It will be done in a few days. So I'm lying anyways.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, ok. Well, but if a bus runs you over in the meantime (which I hope it doesn't!) there is a chance we'll ship it as is, so...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix it, not sure why the new Github doesn't hide this

@martinsawicki martinsawicki merged commit 90fbf90 into Azure:master Sep 16, 2016
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2017
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants