-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Various API Renames #15593
Various API Renames #15593
Conversation
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ internal class AmqpClient : TransportClient | |||
ServiceEndpoint, | |||
credential, | |||
options.TransportType, | |||
options.Proxy); | |||
options.WebProxy); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure where this came from, but I question the drift from the naming for the same concept in Event Hubs across the languages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was based on a comment from Clemens in the Api View.
{ | ||
entry[ManagementConstants.Properties.ViaPartitionKey] = message.ViaPartitionKey; | ||
entry[ManagementConstants.Properties.ViaPartitionKey] = message.TransactionPartitionKey; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Should the constant member also be renamed to match?
Make MaxReceiveTime internal within the ProcessorOptions.
Update entity name exception message.
Fixes #14986, #14975, #10646