Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom entity deserialization #16346

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

seankane-msft
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@seankane-msft seankane-msft added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Tables labels Jan 26, 2021
@seankane-msft seankane-msft self-assigned this Jan 26, 2021
sdk/tables/azure-data-tables/azure/data/tables/_models.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/tables/azure-data-tables/azure/data/tables/_models.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
entity = {
u"PartitionKey": u"pk",
u"RowKey": u"rk",
u"Birthday": u"2020-01-01T12:59:59.0123456Z",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we also try (maybe in a separate test) doing this with an edmtype?
IIRC - it would be something like:
u"Birthday": EdmType(EdmTypes.Datetime, u"2020-01-01T12:59:59.0123456Z")

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will raise a failure because the EntityProperty will force it to be a datetime.datetime object and this will fail on the seven decimal places.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's have EntityProperty default to passing through strings rather than attempt to manipulate them into datetime.

@Azure Azure deleted a comment from check-enforcer bot Feb 11, 2021
@check-enforcer
Copy link

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run python - [service] - ci

@annatisch
Copy link
Member

Putting this on ice for now :)

@annatisch annatisch closed this Mar 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Tables
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants