Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[AutoRelease] t2-policyinsights-2021-12-04-62312 #22005

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2021
Merged

[AutoRelease] t2-policyinsights-2021-12-04-62312 #22005

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2021

Conversation

azclibot
Copy link
Contributor

@azclibot azclibot commented Dec 4, 2021

SDKAuto and others added 2 commits November 1, 2021 02:35
@ArcturusZhang
CodeGen from PR 16250 in Azure/azure-rest-api-specs
b9eb429 
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.PolicyInsights to add version stable/2021-10-01 (Azure#16250)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.PolicyInsights from version stable/2019-07-01 to version 2021-10-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Microsoft.PolicyInsights/remediations new API version: 2021-10-01

* Add Go tag

* Add Java tag

* Update specification/policyinsights/resource-manager/readme.md

Co-authored-by: Dapeng Zhang <ufo54153@gmail.com>

* Remove Go SDK generation flag

Co-authored-by: Dapeng Zhang <ufo54153@gmail.com>
version,CHANGELOG
895c943
@msyyc
Copy link
Member

msyyc commented Dec 4, 2021

issue link:https://github.com/Azure/sdk-release-request/issues/2281

@ghost ghost added the customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. label Dec 4, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 4, 2021

Thank you for your contribution azclibot! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

@check-enforcer
Copy link

check-enforcer bot commented Dec 4, 2021

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run python - [service] - ci

@RAY-316 RAY-316 changed the title [AutoRelease] t2-policyinsights-2021-12-04-62312(Do not merge) [AutoRelease] t2-policyinsights-2021-12-04-62312 Dec 8, 2021
@msyyc msyyc merged commit beb2976 into Azure:main Dec 8, 2021
@msyyc msyyc deleted the t2-policyinsights-2021-12-04-62312 branch December 8, 2021 01:41
hildurhodd pushed a commit to hildurhodd/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2022
@ArcturusZhang @hildurhodd
[AutoRelease] t2-policyinsights-2021-12-04-62312 (Azure#22005)
b227ea2 
* CodeGen from PR 16250 in Azure/azure-rest-api-specs
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.PolicyInsights to add version stable/2021-10-01 (Azure#16250)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.PolicyInsights from version stable/2019-07-01 to version 2021-10-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Microsoft.PolicyInsights/remediations new API version: 2021-10-01

* Add Go tag

* Add Java tag

* Update specification/policyinsights/resource-manager/readme.md

Co-authored-by: Dapeng Zhang <ufo54153@gmail.com>

* Remove Go SDK generation flag

Co-authored-by: Dapeng Zhang <ufo54153@gmail.com>

* version,CHANGELOG

Co-authored-by: SDKAuto <sdkautomation@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Dapeng Zhang <ufo54153@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: PythonSdkPipelines <PythonSdkPipelines>
azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
@komo23x @namanag16
@ZhidaLiu @libc16
CodeGen from PR 21761 in Azure/azure-rest-api-specs
cb54b44 
Machinelearningservices microsoft.machine learning services 2022 12 01 preview (Azure#21761)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.MachineLearningServices from version preview/2022-10-01-preview to version 2022-12-01-preview

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Add Dec API Registries Swagger (Azure#21419)

* add december registries swagger + examples

* add status code 202 in examples

* fix 202 examples

* fixes

* fixes

* fix

* add 202 back in for put/patch

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com>

* remove location (Azure#21430)

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com>

* remove readonly flag on schedules property for CI (Azure#21653)

Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <naagarw@microsoft.com>

* add missing workspace properties (Azure#21725)

* December preview updating mfe.json specs (Azure#21510)

* December preview updating mfe.json specs

* MFE Dec 2022 Preview API - Adding logbase

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation fix

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation fix, add missing location

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - typo fix

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix api version in automljob example

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix for multiselectenabled error

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix for multiselectenabled error

* Fix  for 1006 - RemovedDefinition (RecurrenceTrigger,CronTrigger) (Azure#21822)

* fix ReadonlyPropertyChanged of MLC (Azure#21814)

Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com>

* fixed custom-words conflict (Azure#21829)

* fix custom-words conflict merge (Azure#21830)

* example fix (INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER) (Azure#21832)

Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local>

* example fix, use correct api preview version  - (INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER) (Azure#21833)

Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local>

* Revert breaking change for MLC swagger 2022-12-01-preview (Azure#21885)

Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com>

* Revert Connection Category back to enum. (Azure#21939)

* revert provisioning state change (Azure#21940)

* remove body (Azure#21978)

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com>

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call (Azure#22005)

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call

* fix examples for patch - remove body

* fixed formatting

* Ivalbert fix patch2 (Azure#22006)

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call

* fix examples for patch - remove body

* fixed formatting

* fixed formatting

* Updated custom words (Azure#22262)

* Fixed prettier errors (Azure#22237)

* fixed examples for LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER check (Azure#22293)

* fixed examples for LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER check (Azure#22294)

* Example fix - OBJECT_MISSING_REQUIRED_PROPERTY - Missing required property: triggerType (Azure#22317)

---------

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <23komal.yadav23@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <namanag16@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <naagarw@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: ZhidaLiu <zhili@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: libc16 <88697960+libc16@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@msyyc msyyc msyyc approved these changes

@RAY-316 RAY-316 Awaiting requested review from RAY-316

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@azclibot @msyyc