Add v4 sub-folder so this module could run with AzureRM provider both v3 and v4.

[lonegunmanb]

Describe your changes

This pr added v4 sub-folder and referenced all .tf files via symbolic link, and patch resources by adding Terraform override files, so the users who'd like to use AzureRM v4 could do it by setting module's source to Azure/aks/azurerm//v4.

Issue number

#000

Checklist before requesting a review

• The pr title can be used to describe what this pr did in CHANGELOG.md file
• I have executed pre-commit on my machine
• I have passed pr-check on my machine

Thanks for your cooperation!

[Glaaj]

Is this one on the radar? I'm waiting for this module to be ready for V4 so that I can leverage the options V4 has to offer like service endpoints on a vnet..

[johnknutsonhc]

Anything we can do to help move this along? We'd like to update our azurerm provider to 4.x

[philippeckelintive]

The failed action clearly states the problem:

end to end / acc-tests
The job running on runner GitHub Actions 784 has exceeded the maximum execution time of 360 minutes.

6 hours is GitHub's usage limit.

I'd guess splitting up the test into smaller chunks should solve this.

[zioproto]

Hello all,

if you have a urgent need to move to azurerm v4,
my suggestion is to look into this new Microsoft AKS resource module, that is part of the AVM initiative:

https://github.com/Azure/terraform-azurerm-avm-res-containerservice-managedcluster/

This module is guaranteed to be V4 by the end of January 2025.

For the current terraform-azurerm-aks module, we don't have a clear plan for the upgrade.
We might come up with some instructions to migrate to the AVM module, but there is nothing decided yet.

Cc: @ibersanoMS @nellyk @lonegunmanb

[lonegunmanb]

The failed action clearly states the problem:

end to end / acc-tests
The job running on runner GitHub Actions 784 has exceeded the maximum execution time of 360 minutes.

6 hours is GitHub's usage limit.

I'd guess splitting up the test into smaller chunks should solve this.

Thanks a lot @philippeckelintive for this comment. I'll try to solve this issue.

Copilot reviewed 64 out of 82 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 suggestion.

Files not reviewed (18)

• deprecated_variables.tf: Language not supported
• examples/application_gateway_ingress_v4/data.tf: Language not supported
• examples/application_gateway_ingress_v4/k8s_workload.tf: Language not supported
• examples/application_gateway_ingress_v4/main.tf: Language not supported
• examples/application_gateway_ingress_v4/main_override.tf: Language not supported
• examples/application_gateway_ingress_v4/outputs.tf: Language not supported
• examples/application_gateway_ingress_v4/providers.tf: Language not supported
• examples/application_gateway_ingress_v4/providers_override.tf: Language not supported
• examples/application_gateway_ingress_v4/variables.tf: Language not supported
• examples/multiple_node_pools/main.tf: Language not supported
• examples/multiple_node_pools/main_override.tf: Language not supported
• examples/multiple_node_pools_v4/main.tf: Language not supported
• examples/multiple_node_pools_v4/main_override.tf: Language not supported
• examples/multiple_node_pools_v4/outputs.tf: Language not supported
• examples/multiple_node_pools_v4/providers.tf: Language not supported
• examples/multiple_node_pools_v4/providers_override.tf: Language not supported
• examples/multiple_node_pools_v4/variables.tf: Language not supported
• examples/named_cluster/main.tf: Language not supported