Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test ticket #1

Closed
romw opened this issue Feb 3, 2015 · 12 comments
Closed

test ticket #1

romw opened this issue Feb 3, 2015 · 12 comments

Comments

@romw
Copy link
Member

romw commented Feb 3, 2015

Reported by romw on 15 Apr 37286050 10:40 UTC
this is a test, this is only a test

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by romw on 14 Apr 37286174 19:06 UTC
(In [4]) fixes#1 - Oh Yeah.

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by romw on 20 Nov 37286174 16:53 UTC
(In [4]) fixes#1 - Oh Yeah.

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by romw on 7 May 37295112 23:33 UTC
Test Trac email again.

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by romw on 18 Sep 37295120 12:53 UTC
Email should still work.

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by Nicolas on 30 Apr 37302358 08:00 UTC
Testing

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by Ageless on 25 Dec 37302441 21:20 UTC
Testing to worksforme.

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by Ageless on 8 Oct 37804511 02:40 UTC
Testing to see if everyone gets the email on this one. Leaving ticket closed. No worry.

Is there any way to delete or edit replies yet, seeing how the above reaction is spam, pointing to porn sites.

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by Nicolas on 21 Jan 37804517 23:33 UTC
Replying to Ageless:

Testing to see if everyone gets the email on this one. Leaving ticket closed. No worry.

I got it, but I had once edited the ticket.

Is there any way to delete or edit replies yet, seeing how the above reaction is spam, pointing to porn sites.

I think it can only be done by manually deleting them from the database...

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by Nicolas on 26 Mar 38020479 19:06 UTC
Removing keyword, to clean up tag list.

Lowering priority just for the hell of it (and to show less Blocker tickets on the list, even if closed).

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by Pepo on 6 Jul 38852747 04:00 UTC
Replying to add:

...installing metal stair rails Interior stair handrail...
I suspect the metal stair rails won't fix the #1 test :-) [[br]]
So better let's kick them off the DB... (sorry for reopening, no idea how to report it, except e-mail).

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by Nicolas on 30 May 38852925 00:26 UTC
I see someone else removed it. Do you remember the spammer's username?

@romw
Copy link
Member Author

romw commented Feb 4, 2015

Commented by Pepo on 31 Dec 38853003 17:20 UTC
Replying to Nicolas:

I see someone else removed it. Do you remember the spammer's username?
It was "add" (as mentioned in "Replying to add:" header of my comment:16).

(I believe the ticket can be closed again :)

AenBleidd referenced this issue in AenBleidd/boinc Jul 20, 2018
Current script_validator implementation contains next statements:

sprintf(cmd, "../bin/%s", init_script[0].c_str());

and

sprintf(cmd, "../bin/%s", compare_script[0].c_str());

It is dangerous to use this arrays
that are filled by parsing command line
without validating whether they contain any elements
and leads to next behavior:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000040f838 in compare_results (r1=..., r2=..., match=match@entry=@0x7ffffffb6c17: false) at script_validator.cpp:154
154	script_validator.cpp: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  0x000000000040f838 in compare_results (r1=..., r2=..., match=match@entry=@0x7ffffffb6c17: false) at script_validator.cpp:154
#1  0x000000000040e85d in check_set (results=std::vector of length 2, capacity 2 = {...}, wu=..., canonicalid=@0x7ffffffb6dd0: 0,
    retry=@0x7ffffffb6dcf: false) at validate_util2.cpp:134
#2  0x000000000040944e in handle_wu (validator=..., items=std::vector of length 3, capacity 4 = {...}) at validator.cpp:411
BOINC#3  0x000000000040a9f2 in do_validate_scan () at validator.cpp:730
BOINC#4  0x000000000040aae4 in main_loop () at validator.cpp:756
BOINC#5  0x00000000004039f6 in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffdd48) at validator.cpp:929

This fix checks whether these arrays contain some elements
and output a readable error of missed inout parameter.

Signed-off-by: Vitalii Koshura <lestat.de.lionkur@gmail.com>
AenBleidd pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 10, 2018
TheAspens pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2019
Update of commits to BOINC/boinc master since I forked.
CharlieFenton pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2020
…ersions that support building both architectures, x86_64-only binaries on Xcode versions that support only x86_64 and arm64-only binaries on Xcode versions that support only arm64.

CAUTION #1: I don't have arm64 macintosh hardware so this has been tested only on an x86_64 system.
CAUTION #2: This was developed on MacOS 11.0 beta 3 and Xcode 12.0 beta 2, not final release builds
CAUTION #3: At this time OpenSSL does not yet provide a way to build for MacOS with arm64 architecture, so I implemented a temporary workaround, which may or may not work properly on arm64 Macs.
CharlieFenton pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2020
…elease/7/7.16

* commit 'b2ca098750879d81f96edbb91eb17a20dc941c99': (120 commits)
  update translation
  Mac: Don't offer to run graphics apps if architecture incompatible with CPU type and OS version  - For example, MacOS 10.15 or later can't run 32-bit apps; Intel macs can't run arm apps, etc.
  Manager: Change "Show graphics" button to "Stop graphics" when gfx is running - provides another GUI to stop graphics apps
  Mac: add x86_64-apple-darwin platform to arm64 Macs, since Apple's Rosetta 2 emulator will run x86_64 apps
  Update translations
  Update translations
  Mac: Enable close button when running "Show Graphics" from BOINC Manager under MacOS 11 Big Sur
  Mac: FIx screensaver coordinator to run properly under Mac OS 11 Big Sur
  Mac: Remove some obsolete code from Xcode project
  Mac: Fix script which creates debug build of wxWidgets library for arm64 architecture
  Mac: fixes to client and Manager to support arm64, remove some obsolete PowerPC support. Caution: we need to add code for arm64 CPU to get_cpu_info_mac() in hostinfo_unix.cpp I have not removed is_native_i386_app() in app_start.cpp so it can be modified to identify arm64 apps
  Mac: Screensaver fixes for arm64 and MacOS 11 Big Sur
  Ensured essential menu items remain enabled when client shuts down
  Mac: Remove obsolete references to PowerPC architecture from BOINC Xcode project
  Mac: Automatically build Universal x86_64 / arm64 binaries on Xcode versions that support building both architectures, x86_64-only binaries on Xcode versions that support only x86_64 and arm64-only binaries on Xcode versions that support only arm64. CAUTION #1: I don't have arm64 macintosh hardware so this has been tested only on an x86_64 system. CAUTION #2: This was developed on MacOS 11.0 beta 3 and Xcode 12.0 beta 2, not final release builds CAUTION #3: At this time OpenSSL does not yet provide a way to build for MacOS with arm64 architecture, so I implemented a temporary workaround, which may or may not work properly on arm64 Macs.
  script_validator: make scripts optional.
  Added MENU_OPEN to the event table
  Update Core KTX and desugar_jdk_libs versions.
  Add keyword
  The user can specify 3 priority-related prefs in cc_config.h: bool no_priority_change int process_priority int process_priority_special
  ...

# Conflicts:
#	curl/ca-bundle.crt
davidpanderson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 19, 2021
Merging changes from upstream
AenBleidd pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2022
Introduce tag <multiattach_vdi_file>
@AenBleidd AenBleidd closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants