-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Image retrieval web demo #1028
Image retrieval web demo #1028
Conversation
[1] Artem Babenko, Anton Slesarev, Alexandr Chigorin, Victor Lempitsky. Neural Codes for Image Retrieval. ECCV 2014. |
@kloudkl I've checked your commit code here, there's no sign you have implemented Neural Codes for Image Retrieval. If you have implemented this, could you kindly tell me where's it? |
No, it has not been implemented. That paper concludes that retraining the network on datasets closely related to the target one improves the image retrieval relevance and that the feature dimension can be greatly reduced with little performance loss. Since this demo is based on the image classification demo of @sergeyk who has published a tutorial for fine-tuning the network on Flickr style dataset and a paper related to the above topics [2], I plan to re-use the image style classification model for searching. The sample images will come from the Flickr style dataset whose thumbnails are readily available online. The feature dimension will be reduced with PCA. [2] Sergey Karayev, Matthew Trentacoste, Helen Han, Aseem Agarwala, Trevor Darrell, Aaron Hertzmann, Holger Winnemoeller. Recognizing Image Style. BMVC 2014. |
Cool! It so happens that I've recently implemented a demo myself: I will not be working on this more in the next few months. If you want to http://similaritydemo.vislab.berkeleyvision.org/similar_to/random/caffe%20fc6/euclidean On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, kloudkl notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Note that this dataset is only 80K images of the Flickr Style dataset. To On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Sergey Karayev sergeykarayev@gmail.com
|
Recently a few new approximate nearest neighbor searching libraries further improved the state of art performance. According to the benchmark of Wei Dong, KGraph was significantly faster than the widely used FLANN. @maheshakya also conducted performance evaluation of several open source approximation nearest implementations Spotify ANNOY, FLANN, KGraph, nearpy and LSH Forest. |
Hi @kloudkl , this shows the actual performances (precision against speed). But this has been done before I have implemented LSHForest in scikit-learn. I'm looking forward to do an overall evaluation after I complete LSHForest. You can get it from this branch. It has not been merged yet to scikit-learn master. |
Closing since this preliminary PR was cancelled by the contributing fork and Sergey's image retrieval demo is online and the code is open source. |
To replace #243.