Thread-specific singleton (from @cypof) #2067
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This means that Caffe::Get has to be moved to common.cpp, and loses its "inline" (but there are no real performance implications).
|
Closing -- merged in #2903 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the first in a series of PRs pulling some work from the parallel branch/@cypof that's ready for immediate consideration, and that will be also be used by future PRs implementing orthogonal work on synchronous parallelism.
This PR switches from a single, global
Caffesingleton to a per-thread singleton, and then performs the necessary circumlocutions to avoid boost/nvcc conflicts. This is both necessary and sufficient for most multi-device work. (Further refactoring to eliminate the singleton is possible, but this is a much simpler sufficient step.)Using the same singleton in different threads is pretty certainly a bad idea, so I see no reason not to merge this change as soon it's verified to be in good working order.
@cypof, your other commits seem to be missing your name and have a different email from your github account. I used your github information for the commit I added here; please confirm that the author information is as you desire.