Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade papaparse from 5.2.0 to 5.3.1 #5

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade papaparse from 5.2.0 to 5.3.1.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 9 months ago, on 2021-05-28.
Release notes
Package name: papaparse
  • 5.3.1 - 2021-05-28

    Minor version bump

  • 5.3.0 - 2020-08-25

    We are happy to annunce a new minor release of PapaParse.

    This release includes the following change:

    • Allow to escape formulae for safer opening on spreedsheet software (See: #793 for full details)
  • 5.2.0 - 2020-04-02

    We are happy to announce version 5.2.0.

    This version contains a new feature that allows to perform post request when downloading files.

    It also fixes a ReDOS vulnerability issue. See #777 for more details.

from papaparse GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: papaparse

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

I hope these guys keep the credit to the original project
1 participant