[Snyk] Security upgrade sass from 1.70.0 to 1.79.0

[bozza-man]

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

• frontend/package.json
• frontend/yarn.lock

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

	Issue	Score
	Uncontrolled resource consumption SNYK-JS-BRACES-6838727	169

---

Important

• Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
• Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
• This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Uncontrolled resource consumption

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
quivr	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 18, 2024 1:50am

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[phylum-io]

Phylum OSS Supply Chain Risk Analysis - FAILED

This repository analyzes the risk of new dependencies. An
administrator of this repository has set requirements via Phylum policy.

If you see this comment, one or more dependencies have failed Phylum's risk analysis.

Package: cryptography@42.0.2 failed.

cryptography@42.0.2 is vulnerable to cryptography NULL pointer dereference with pkcs12.serialize_key_and_certificates when called with a non-matching certificate and private key and an hmac_hash override

Risk Domain: Software Vulnerability
Risk Level: high

Reason: Critical or High software vulnerability

Package: ddtrace@2.6.2 failed.

ddtrace@2.6.2 contains obfuscated Python.

Risk Domain: Malicious Code
Risk Level: high

Reason: Obfuscated code

ddtrace@2.6.2 contains suspicious behavior in the setup.py.

Risk Domain: Malicious Code
Risk Level: low

Reason: Install Code Execution (Suspicious)

Package: litellm@1.23.15 failed.

litellm@1.23.15 is vulnerable to LiteLLM has Server-Side Template Injection vulnerability

Risk Domain: Software Vulnerability
Risk Level: critical

Reason: Critical or High software vulnerability

litellm@1.23.15 is vulnerable to litellm passes untrusted data to eval function without sanitization

Risk Domain: Software Vulnerability
Risk Level: high

Reason: Critical or High software vulnerability

litellm@1.23.15 is vulnerable to LiteLLM Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Risk Domain: Software Vulnerability
Risk Level: high

Reason: Critical or High software vulnerability

Package: xlsxwriter@3.1.9 failed.

XlsxWriter@3.1.9 contains suspicious behavior in the setup.py.

Risk Domain: Malicious Code
Risk Level: low

Reason: Install Code Execution (Suspicious)

View this project in the Phylum UI