Add zsh-completion reference guide #1020
Conversation
okdana
force-pushed
the
dana/completion-reference
branch
from
e2c982e
to
5e69f56
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
omg yes yes yes! Thank you. This clarifies so much for me. This should hopefully stave off my desire to have this file be auto generated. :-) For now, anyway. :P
Out of curiosity, how similar is setting up auto-completions in bash to zsh? I don't think I realized how high quality these completions were. Now I want them in bash. :-)
| # Although there may appear to be six specs here, there are actually nine; we | ||
| # use brace expansion to combine specs for options that go by multiple names, | ||
| # like `-q` and `--quiet`. This is customary, and ties in with the fact that zsh | ||
| # merges completion possibilities together when they have the same description. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh my. This one paragraph just clarified so many things.
|
I'm not very knowledgeable about bash's completion system, but i know that it's functionally simpler than zsh's, and there's less abstraction built around it. It doesn't provide any of the fancy menu stuff that zsh has, and it's not especially configurable (mostly because there's not a lot to configure). I think it's possible to do some fancy things with it, but again since there's not much abstraction built around it you often have to do it manually (and so nobody bothers). I think the zsh isn't super difficult to switch to, btw, if you ever feel compelled to try it. The default configuration is terrible, but if you set it up right it can be made to work almost like a super-set of bash. I was able to switch the default interactive shell in our product at work over to zsh without any of our tech-support people really even noticing the difference (besides the improved completion). |
|
Drats. I was afraid you'd say that. I'm not a bash power user by any means, so I'm sure I could switch to zsh, but I fear the yak shave. Some day, perhaps. :-) |
As discussed in #1017 again — this adds a brief* explanation of
_argumentsspecifications to the zsh completion function, as a reference for other developers to use when making minor changes to the function. I mainly focussed on option specs, since that's the most common thing to change.* Not actually that brief, lol. Is it too wordy for a 'reference'? If you have suggestions as to how i could make it more 'skimmable' i'm definitely open to them. Or obv if you have any unanswered questions i can address them
ETA: Fixed very minor typo