Add parallel recursive directory iterator. #223
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This adds a new walk type in the `ignore` crate, `WalkParallel`, which provides a way for recursively iterating over a set of paths in parallel while respecting various ignore rules. The API is a bit strange, as a closure producing a closure isn't something one often sees, but it does seem to work well. This also allowed us to simplify much of the worker logic in ripgrep proper, where MultiWorker is now gone.
BurntSushi
force-pushed
the
ignore-parallel
branch
from
c5bd183 to
b272be2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a new walk type in the
ignorecrate,WalkParallel, whichprovides a way for recursively iterating over a set of paths in parallel
while respecting various ignore rules.
The API is a bit strange, as a closure producing a closure isn't
something one often sees, but it does seem to work well.
This also allowed us to simplify much of the worker logic in ripgrep
proper, where MultiWorker is now gone.