Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove vernetperronllc references from codebase #38

Closed
Byte-Lab opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #43
Closed

Remove vernetperronllc references from codebase #38

Byte-Lab opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #43
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Byte-Lab
Copy link
Owner

Byte-Lab commented Oct 4, 2019

vernetperronllc is a vestige of when the creators of JCoz were toying with the idea of trying to monetize it. The plan is now for JCoz to be and remain free indefinitely, so let's remove vernetperronllc from the codebase.

@Byte-Lab Byte-Lab self-assigned this Oct 4, 2019
Byte-Lab added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2019
Fixes #38

Once upon a time, it was under consideration
to try and monetize JCoz. This is no longer
the case, and JCoz is free and open source
under the permissions afforded by the GPL.
This change therefore removes references to
vernetperronllc, and restructures the layout
of the Java portion of JCoz accordingly.

Testing Done: Verified that java and tests
make targets can still be built, and that
docker image can still be built.
Byte-Lab added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2019
Fixes #38

Once upon a time, it was under consideration
to try and monetize JCoz. This is no longer
the case, and JCoz is free and open source
under the permissions afforded by the GPL.
This change therefore removes references to
vernetperronllc, and restructures the layout
of the Java portion of JCoz accordingly.

Testing Done: Verified that java and tests
make targets can still be built, and that
docker image can still be built.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant