Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDoE: Adding previous data to IRSF #1077

Closed
sotorrio1 opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1096
Closed

SDoE: Adding previous data to IRSF #1077

sotorrio1 opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1096
Assignees
Labels
Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR SDoE Sequential Design of Experiments

Comments

@sotorrio1
Copy link
Member

Currently only Uniform Space-Filling (USF) and Non-Uniform Space-Filling (NUSF) are able to handle previous data files. That capability needs to be added to the Input-Response Space-Filling (IRSF) side of things as well.

@sotorrio1 sotorrio1 added the SDoE Sequential Design of Experiments label Oct 18, 2022
@sotorrio1 sotorrio1 self-assigned this Oct 18, 2022
@ksbeattie ksbeattie moved this to In Progress in 2022 Dec Release Oct 25, 2022
@ksbeattie ksbeattie added the Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR label Oct 25, 2022
@ksbeattie
Copy link
Member

@sotorrio1 is this still possible for the Dec release (as in next week)?

@sotorrio1
Copy link
Member Author

@ksbeattie Still possible, trying hard to make it happen :)

@ksbeattie
Copy link
Member

@sotorrio1, any update? We've only got a few days now...

@sotorrio1
Copy link
Member Author

I'll get you an update on this either later today or tomorrow. R code turned out not to be as straight forward as I though...

@sotorrio1
Copy link
Member Author

@ksbeattie don't hold the release for this. We'll get it into the master before the end of the year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR SDoE Sequential Design of Experiments
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants