-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: Syntax sugars for parameter validators #108
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8c008da
refactor(core): compose compiler environments
oscar60310 f7ddbf8
feat(core): add validation filters and extract their value to metadata
oscar60310 da3e2e7
feat(build): extract validator from metedata to parameter definitions
oscar60310 a3a1a14
fix(test-utils): update mock compiler injections
oscar60310 8864af6
feat(core, test-utils): let validation filter can run when template e…
oscar60310 be6f6c5
feat(core, build): implement getConstraints for all built-in validator
oscar60310 ff5ddbe
fix(core): update validation filter name, add prefix "is_"
oscar60310 90c7bb4
feat(core): add new validator: enum
oscar60310 d476da7
feat(core): accept static array as the argument of preCheck validatio…
oscar60310 ab6e7f4
fix(core): enum validate should allow empty value
oscar60310 eca492d
docs(core): add the description about validation filters
oscar60310 c3fb05c
docs(core): add description about VF and PCVF
oscar60310 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
22 changes: 5 additions & 17 deletions
22
packages/core/src/lib/template-engine/built-in-extensions/validator/filterChecker.ts
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If there are the same name validators in metadata and schema requests, will we exclude one of them?
Because we may face some cases which the args are different in schema request and SQL syntax validation filter:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pushed all validators to the list because I didn't know how to compose all of the validators, e.g.
string(format="\d+")
string(format="[1-5]+")
So I prefer to execute all of these validators.
P.S. Our constraints have composed logic so that we won't duplicate them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks so much