Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A0-1672: units returned by run_session #439

Conversation

fixxxedpoint
Copy link
Contributor

A separate method in member run_session_for_units that allows one to track finalization of batches of units.

Copy link

Please make sure the following happened

  • Appropriate tests created
  • Infrastructure updated accordingly
  • Updated existing documentation
  • New documentation created
  • Version bumped if breaking changes

@fixxxedpoint fixxxedpoint force-pushed the A0-1672_abft-performance-PR branch 2 times, most recently from f67f02f to 2b09eeb Compare April 19, 2024 15:42
Copy link
Contributor

@timorleph timorleph left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool changes, although I have some comments.

Also cc @joschisan – as you can see we are actually implementing the more advanced interface after all, so feel free to comment here.

mock/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
types/src/dataio.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/aleph_bft_api.md Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/member.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/member.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
types/src/dataio.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/extension/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/dag/reconstruction/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/dag/reconstruction/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fixxxedpoint fixxxedpoint force-pushed the A0-1672_abft-performance-PR branch 4 times, most recently from 4851fad to c83c1ae Compare April 22, 2024 14:59
consensus/src/member.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
types/src/dataio.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@joschisan
Copy link
Contributor

joschisan commented May 2, 2024

@timorleph the advanced interface works for us just as well as far as I can tell.

Copy link
Contributor

@timorleph timorleph left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple small complaints more, just to make the interfaces perfect. ;>

consensus/src/extension/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/runway/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/runway/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/runway/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
types/src/dataio.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/member.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
consensus/src/member.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fixxxedpoint fixxxedpoint merged commit 2ebeb30 into Cardinal-Cryptography:main May 7, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants