You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looks like there are several glTF 1.0 models still being shipped with Cesium, since almost no one else supports glTF 1.0, we should make sure everything we ship uses 2.0. We probably also want to revisit how many different versins of some models we have and perhaps more cleanly label some of the files/folders.
Might be a good idea to make everything glb as well. This is sample data, not test data so we should treat it like we were shipping production-ready models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Verify that all Sandcastle examples that use these models still look correct after the models are switched over to glTF 2.0. This includes the Shadows demo in the Development folder.
Verify that all sample models, including ones that are already 2.0, pass the glTF validator.
Make sure that unit tests pass. You can either run npm run test or go to http://localhost:8080/ and click Run all tests [EDIT: models in sample data folder shouldn't actually affect tests, but still good to do for practice]
Looks like there are several glTF 1.0 models still being shipped with Cesium, since almost no one else supports glTF 1.0, we should make sure everything we ship uses 2.0. We probably also want to revisit how many different versins of some models we have and perhaps more cleanly label some of the files/folders.
Might be a good idea to make everything glb as well. This is sample data, not test data so we should treat it like we were shipping production-ready models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: