Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup Particle and Particle System for the 1.46 Release #6510

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 24, 2018

Conversation

hanbollar
Copy link

@hanbollar hanbollar commented Apr 27, 2018

Fixes #6485

  • remove deprecated items in 1.45 from Particle and ParticleSystem for 1.46

SECOND DEPRECATION STAGE:
See Todos #6515

@cesium-concierge
Copy link

Signed CLA is on file.

@hanbollar, thanks for the pull request! Maintainers, we have a signed CLA from @hanbollar, so you can review this at any time.


I am a bot who helps you make Cesium awesome! Contributions to my configuration are welcome.

🌍 🌎 🌏

Copy link
Contributor

@ggetz ggetz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for finishing up the deprecation @hanbollar!

CHANGES.md Outdated
### 1.46 - 2018-06-01

##### Breaking Changes :mega:
* `ParticleSystem` no longer uses `forces`. [#]()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That should link to this PR

@hanbollar
Copy link
Author

@ggetz updated

CHANGES.md Outdated

##### Breaking Changes :mega:
* `ParticleSystem` no longer uses `forces`. [#6510](https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium/pull/6510)
* `Particle` no longer uses `size`, `rate`, `lifeTime`, `life`, `minimumLife`, `maximumLife`, `minimumWidth`, `minimumHeight`, `maximumWidth`, and `maximumHeight`. [#]()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same for this link.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lol woops i should hv caught that

@hanbollar
Copy link
Author

@ggetz fixed

@hanbollar
Copy link
Author

@ggetz just following up - is there anything left for me to do for this for 1.46 ?

@hpinkos
Copy link
Contributor

hpinkos commented May 8, 2018

bump @ggetz

* @deprecated
* @type {Number}
*/
width : {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ggetz do you think we should remove these width and height properties? They don't seem particularly useful since users can just access this.imageSize directly

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with that, we'll just need to make sure it's updated in the tutorial if it was used there.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They shouldn't be since they were added for the first time in the PR, but I'll double check

@ggetz
Copy link
Contributor

ggetz commented May 24, 2018

Looks good to me other than #6510 (comment)

@hpinkos hpinkos merged commit b0fab49 into CesiumGS:master May 24, 2018
@hpinkos
Copy link
Contributor

hpinkos commented May 24, 2018

Thanks for cleaning this up @hanbollar! Hope you're having a good summer =)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants