-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gossipsub v1.1: Security extensions to improve on attack resilience and bootstrapping #73
Comments
Thanks for bringing this up! We can start the implementation initiative in the next few weeks. |
I was thinking about that last week, but I think that only the gossipsub protocol here needs to be updated. We aim to get the Anyway, let me know here when you start working on it, so that we get aligned and I can unblock you with anything that is needed :) |
Ok, thanks for the info, I had forgotten that we are already ready to go for 0.28 here. One question I have is around the signed envelopes and peer routing records described here libp2p/specs#217 |
We foresee libp2p to provide the node's signed addresses via its API (it would be cached interally and updated when the addresses change). So, I would say for you to not worry about that. Me or Jacob can work on that, and then we integrate this in gossipsub as a follow up PR. It should be straightforward. However, if you want to get it in |
taking notes on https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/pubsub/gossipsub/gossipsub-v1.1.md for my own organization
|
🎉 |
With the new spec of the gossipsub protocol already finished and implemented in
go-libp2p
, other implementations are starting to update to v1.1While it is backwards compatible with v1.0, there are important updates regarding security, as well as bootstrapping that makes it important to update sooner rather than later.
@wemeetagain what are your expectations for this update?
Gossipsub v1.1 checklist
Polishing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: