Some small cleanups #61
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This makes the workflow name read a little bit like a make command, which I find easier to parse, and this brings it a little bit more in line with how our Travis commands were set up. Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
nickdesaulniers
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2021
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
nathanchance
force-pushed
the
small-cleanups
branch
from
7651ee3 to
27486b6
Compare
|
I went ahead and dropped it, I was not entirely sold on it anyways :) thanks for the review! |
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
Hi,
I am experiencing many warnings when trying to build tools/testing/selftests.
Here's one such example from rseq tree:
| param_test.c:1234:10: error: address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to _Atomic type ('intptr_t *' (aka 'long *') invalid)
| 1234 | while (!atomic_load(&args->percpu_list_ptr)) {}
| | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| /usr/local/google/home/justinstitt/repos/tc-build/build/llvm/final/lib/clang/18/include/stdatomic.h:140:29: note: expanded from macro 'atomic_load'
| 140 | #define atomic_load(object) __c11_atomic_load(object, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)
| | ^ ~~~~~~
I added the _Atomic type in various locations to silence _all_ (10) of these
warnings. I'm wondering, though, perhaps the absence of these _Atomic
types in the first place is on purpose? Am I on the right track to fix
these warnings without damaging the legitimacy of the tests at hand?
I'd like some feedback about where to go from here and if others are
experiencing the same issues. Thanks!
FWIW here's my specific build incantation on Clang-18 (49d41de57896e935cd5726719c5208bce22694ae):
$ make LLVM=1 -j128 ARCH=x86_64 mrproper headers defconfig kselftest-merge
$ make LLVM=1 ARCH=x86_64 -C tools/testing/selftests
Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1698
Link: ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2#61
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2023
When building with Clang, I am getting many warnings from the selftests/rseq tree.
Here's one such example from rseq tree:
| param_test.c:1234:10: error: address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to _Atomic type ('intptr_t *' (aka 'long *') invalid)
| 1234 | while (!atomic_load(&args->percpu_list_ptr)) {}
| | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| /usr/local/google/home/justinstitt/repos/tc-build/build/llvm/final/lib/clang/18/include/stdatomic.h:140:29: note: expanded from macro 'atomic_load'
| 140 | #define atomic_load(object) __c11_atomic_load(object, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)
| | ^ ~~~~~~
Use compiler builtins `__atomic_load_n()` and `__atomic_store_n()` with
accompanying __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE and __ATOMIC_RELEASE, respectively. This
will fix the warnings because the compiler builtins do not expect their
arguments to have _Atomic type. This should also make TSAN happier.
Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1698
Link: ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2#61
Suggested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
akiyks
pushed a commit
to akiyks/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2023
When building with Clang, I am getting many warnings from the selftests/rseq tree.
Here's one such example from rseq tree:
| param_test.c:1234:10: error: address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to _Atomic type ('intptr_t *' (aka 'long *') invalid)
| 1234 | while (!atomic_load(&args->percpu_list_ptr)) {}
| | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| /usr/local/google/home/justinstitt/repos/tc-build/build/llvm/final/lib/clang/18/include/stdatomic.h:140:29: note: expanded from macro 'atomic_load'
| 140 | #define atomic_load(object) __c11_atomic_load(object, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)
| | ^ ~~~~~~
Use compiler builtins `__atomic_load_n()` and `__atomic_store_n()` with
accompanying __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE and __ATOMIC_RELEASE, respectively. This
will fix the warnings because the compiler builtins do not expect their
arguments to have _Atomic type. This should also make TSAN happier.
Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1698
Link: ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2#61
Suggested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All of the commit messages should be pretty self explanatory.