Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated styling ruleset #608

Merged

Conversation

sauravpanda
Copy link
Member

@sauravpanda sauravpanda commented Oct 3, 2024

Improve code review formatting and categorization

  • Purpose:
    Enhance the code review process by improving the formatting and categorization of issues.
  • Key Changes:
    • Implemented a scoring system to categorize issues as "critical", "important", or "can ignore" based on various factors like impact, severity, and issue type.
    • Introduced a filter_and_categorize_issues function to filter out certain issue types and assign appropriate impact levels to the remaining issues.
    • Updated the create_pr_review_text function to generate a more concise and actionable review summary.
    • Added support for custom rules in the code review process, allowing the reviewer to specify additional guidelines.
  • Impact:
    The changes will result in more focused and impactful code reviews, helping developers quickly identify and address the most critical issues. The improved categorization and formatting will also make the review process more efficient and easier to understand.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description # Improve Code Review Formatting and Categorization
  • **Purpose:
    **
    Enhance the code review process by improving the formatting and categorization of issues.
  • Key Changes:
    • Implemented a new filter_and_categorize_issues function to categorize issues based on a calculated score.
    • Added support for custom rules that can mark issues as high severity.
    • Refactored the create_pr_review_text function to use the new issue categorization.
    • Simplified the review_pull_request method by moving custom rule handling to the prompt generation.
  • **Impact:
    **
    These changes will provide more structured and actionable code reviews, helping developers better prioritize and address the most critical issues.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description None

Copy link
Contributor

kaizen-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

🔍 Code Review Summary

Attention Required: This push has potential issues. 🚨

Overview

  • Total Feedbacks: 1 (Critical: 1, Refinements: 0)
  • Files Affected: 1
  • Code Quality: [█████████████████░░░] 85% (Good)

🚨 Critical Issues

security (1 issues)

1. Potential exposure of sensitive information in logs.


📁 File: kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py
🔍 Reasoning:
Logging sensitive information, such as user data or API responses, can lead to security vulnerabilities.

💡 Solution:
Ensure that sensitive information is redacted or not logged at all.

Current Code:

self.logger.error(f'Error during chat completion:{e}')

Suggested Code:

self.logger.error('Error during chat completion: An error occurred.')

Test Cases

8 file need updates to their tests. Run !unittest to generate create and update tests.


✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Useful Commands
  • Feedback: Share feedback on kaizens performance with !feedback [your message]
  • Ask PR: Reply with !ask-pr [your question]
  • Review: Reply with !review
  • Update Tests: Reply with !unittest to create a PR with test changes

Copy link
Contributor

@kaizen-bot kaizen-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.

kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@sauravpanda sauravpanda merged commit 94462a3 into main Oct 3, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant