Improve Bitbucket patch diff handling

[mrT23]

User description

• Implement publish_file_comments method placeholder
• Enhance is_supported method to include publish_file_comments
• Refactor diff splitting logic to handle Bitbucket-specific headers
• Improve error handling and logging for file content retrieval
• Add get_pr_owner_id method to retrieve PR owner ID
• Update _get_pr_file_content to fetch file content from remote link
• Fix variable name typo in extend_patch function in git_patch_processing.py

---

PR Type

Enhancement, Bug fix

---

Description

• Enhanced Bitbucket provider functionality:
  • Added support for publish_file_comments capability
  • Implemented get_pr_owner_id method to retrieve PR owner ID
  • Improved diff splitting logic to handle Bitbucket-specific headers
• Improved error handling and logging:
  • Enhanced file content retrieval with better error handling
  • Added more detailed logging for diff splitting errors
• Bug fixes:
  • Corrected logic in extend_patch function to handle empty original file content
  • Fixed variable name typos in patch extension calculations
• Code improvements:
  • Refactored _get_pr_file_content to fetch file content from remote link
  • Updated is_supported method to include new capabilities

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Bug fix	git_patch_processing.py Bug fixes in patch extension logic                                              pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py Fixed a bug in the extend_patch function by checking if original_file_str is empty Corrected variable names from len(original_lines) to len_original_lines +3/-3
Enhancement	bitbucket_provider.py Bitbucket provider enhancements and error handling              pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py Added publish_file_comments method placeholder Enhanced is_supported method to include publish_file_comments Improved diff splitting logic to handle Bitbucket-specific headers Added error handling and logging for file content retrieval Implemented get_pr_owner_id method Updated _get_pr_file_content to fetch file content from remote link +46/-10

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 85

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

🔀 Multiple PR themes Sub-PR theme: Fix and improve patch extension logic Relevant files: pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py Sub-PR theme: Enhance Bitbucket provider with new features and error handling Relevant files: pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py

⚡ Key issues to review Possible Bug The condition for handling empty original file content might not cover all edge cases. Consider additional validation or error handling. Incomplete Implementation The publish_file_comments method is implemented as a placeholder and needs to be completed. Error Handling The error handling in the get_diff_files method could be improved. Consider more specific error messages and potential recovery strategies.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Performance	Use a pre-calculated length variable instead of recalculating it Consider using len_original_lines instead of len(original_lines) for consistency and to avoid recalculating the length. pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [55-57] +if extended_start1 - 1 + extended_size1 > len_original_lines: + # we cannot extend beyond the original file + delta_cap = extended_start1 - 1 + extended_size1 - len_original_lines - Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the use of a pre-calculated variable 'len_original_lines' instead of recalculating length, which improves performance and consistency.	10
Best practice	Use a context manager for better resource management when making HTTP requests Consider using a context manager (with statement) when opening the response to ensure proper resource management. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [432-439] try: - response = requests.request("GET", remote_link, headers=self.headers) - if response.status_code == 404: # not found - return "" - contents = response.text - return contents -except Exception: + with requests.request("GET", remote_link, headers=self.headers) as response: + if response.status_code == 404: # not found + return "" + return response.text +except requests.RequestException: return "" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion recommends using a context manager, which is a best practice for proper resource management and can help prevent resource leaks.	8
	Use a more specific exception type for better error handling Consider using a more specific exception type instead of a bare except clause to catch and handle specific errors. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [174-180] try: original_file_content_str = self._get_pr_file_content(diff.old.get_data("links")['self']['href']) new_file_content_str = self._get_pr_file_content(diff.new.get_data("links")['self']['href']) -except Exception as e: +except requests.RequestException as e: get_logger().exception(f"Error - bitbucket failed to get file content, error: {e}") original_file_content_str = "" new_file_content_str = "" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion proposes using a more specific exception type (requests.RequestException), which is a good practice for better error handling and debugging.	7
	Use a more specific exception type for better error handling in HTTP requests Consider using a more specific exception type (e.g., requests.RequestException) instead of a bare except clause to catch and handle specific errors related to the HTTP request. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [432-439] try: response = requests.request("GET", remote_link, headers=self.headers) if response.status_code == 404: # not found return "" contents = response.text return contents -except Exception: +except requests.RequestException: return "" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion is valid but redundant with the second suggestion. It proposes using a specific exception type for HTTP requests, which is good practice but already covered.	6