-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 697
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add rule file_permissions_journalctl #11834
Conversation
Hi @mpurg. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
🤖 A k8s content image for this PR is available at: Click here to see how to deploy itIf you alread have Compliance Operator deployed: Otherwise deploy the content and operator together by checking out ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator and: |
Added red-hatters and suse maintainers as this new rule might be relevant for them |
6209b33
to
08dd3f8
Compare
08dd3f8
to
7307987
Compare
/packit build |
1 similar comment
/packit build |
- New rule for auditing permissions of journalctl command - Satisfies STIG requirement UBTU-22-232140 - Based on file_permissions_system_journal
7307987
to
0f93e53
Compare
Code Climate has analyzed commit 0f93e53 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 59.4% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks!
Description: