Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove zipl_vsyscall_argument from OSPP control file. #12387

Merged

Conversation

ggbecker
Copy link
Member

Description:

  • Remove zipl_vsyscall_argument from OSPP control file.

Rationale:

  • vsyscalls (as vDSO) are on all architectures, but vsyscall emulation (what this option controls) is only on x86, see
    CONFIG_X86_VSYSCALL_EMULATION.

vsyscalls (as vDSO) are on all architectures, but vsyscall emulation
(what this option controls) is only on x86, see
CONFIG_X86_VSYSCALL_EMULATION.
@ggbecker ggbecker added the OSPP OSPP benchmark related. label Sep 17, 2024
@ggbecker ggbecker added this to the 0.1.75 milestone Sep 17, 2024
Copy link

Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request:

Fedora Environment
Open in Gitpod

Oracle Linux 8 Environment
Open in Gitpod

Copy link

🤖 A k8s content image for this PR is available at:
ghcr.io/complianceascode/k8scontent:12387
This image was built from commit: ec8c80b

Click here to see how to deploy it

If you alread have Compliance Operator deployed:
utils/build_ds_container.py -i ghcr.io/complianceascode/k8scontent:12387

Otherwise deploy the content and operator together by checking out ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator and:
CONTENT_IMAGE=ghcr.io/complianceascode/k8scontent:12387 make deploy-local

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit ec8c80b and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 59.5% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

@Mab879
Copy link
Member

Mab879 commented Sep 17, 2024

/packit retest-failed

2 similar comments
@matusmarhefka
Copy link
Member

/packit retest-failed

@matusmarhefka
Copy link
Member

/packit retest-failed

@matusmarhefka matusmarhefka merged commit fb0c5b2 into ComplianceAsCode:master Sep 18, 2024
100 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
OSPP OSPP benchmark related.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants